Difference between revisions of "Jean Charles De Menezes"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The death and reporting of the tragedy of Menezes' shooting, argued his lawyers, was wrapped in a shroud of misinformation.<ref>Harriet Wistrich and Gareth Peirce, [http://www.justice4jean.org/material/17_08_05.doc Press Statement 2: Response to the evidence made public during the last 24 hours as to the true circumstances of the death of Jean Charles de Menezes], 17 August 2005, accessed 06.09.10</ref> | The death and reporting of the tragedy of Menezes' shooting, argued his lawyers, was wrapped in a shroud of misinformation.<ref>Harriet Wistrich and Gareth Peirce, [http://www.justice4jean.org/material/17_08_05.doc Press Statement 2: Response to the evidence made public during the last 24 hours as to the true circumstances of the death of Jean Charles de Menezes], 17 August 2005, accessed 06.09.10</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Defence of Shooting== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir [[Ian Blair]], Commissioner of the [[Metropolitan Police Service|Metropolitan Police]], defended the shooting of Menezes by stating that if the police did not shoot him, they would have faced the risk of “certain death”<ref name="Daily Mail"> Gordon Rayner, ‘The shot Brazilian was here with a fake visa’, ''The Daily Mail'', 29 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 06.09.10</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ian Blair wrote to the Home Office permanent Secretary Sir John Gieve one day after Menezes was killed and stated that he sought to “maximise the legal protection for officers” who were exercising [[Operation Kratos|shoot-to-kill]] powers. He stated that the environment that faced officers meant that they could not “risk the kind of containment and negotiation tactics” that would be normally expected of them. “The only choice an officer may have may be to shoot-to-kill in order to prevent the detonation of a device.”<ref name="Blair letter">[http://cms.met.police.uk/news/policy_organisational_news_and_general_information/commissioner/commissioner_s_letter_to_the_home_office Commissioner's letter to The Home Office], ''Metropolitan Police Service, 30 September 2005, accessed 06.09.10</ref> He also stated that while officers had protection under Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act (reasonable use of force in the specific circumstance) he did “not seek" to "exempt" them from the investigation or prosecution if evidence against them existed. Nevertheless, he stated that he was “confident” that the prosecuting authorities would understand “the pressures under which the ([[SO19|SO19 Unit]]) operates in terrorist scenarios”.<ref name="Blair letter"/> | ||
==Attempts to Prevent IPCC Inquiry== | ==Attempts to Prevent IPCC Inquiry== | ||
| − | Sir [[Ian Blair]], the Commissioner of the [[Metropolitan Police Service]] refused to reveal the tactics that were employed in the shooting of Menezes to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and tried to block an independent investigation being launched by the IPCC. He stated that even though: <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt"> "... there is much concern about revealing … the tactics [of the police] and [the information they are operating upon], I believe that, in a fast-moving, multi-site terrorist situation, in which suicide bombers are clearly a very strong possibility, a chief officer of police should be able to suspend S.17 of the Police Reform Act 2002, which requires us to supply all information that the Independent Police Complaints Commission may require … I have therefore given instructions that the shooting … is not to be referred to the IPCC and that they will be given no access to the scene at the present time. The investigation will be carried out by the Met's own Directorate of Professional Standards. This investigation will be rigorous but subordinate to the needs of the counter-terrorism operation."<ref name="Blair letter" | + | Sir [[Ian Blair]], the Commissioner of the [[Metropolitan Police Service]] refused to reveal the tactics that were employed in the shooting of Menezes to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and tried to block an independent investigation being launched by the IPCC. He stated that even though: <blockquote style="background-color:ivory;border:1pt solid Darkgoldenrod;padding:1%;font-size:10pt"> "... there is much concern about revealing … the tactics [of the police] and [the information they are operating upon], I believe that, in a fast-moving, multi-site terrorist situation, in which suicide bombers are clearly a very strong possibility, a chief officer of police should be able to suspend S.17 of the Police Reform Act 2002, which requires us to supply all information that the Independent Police Complaints Commission may require … I have therefore given instructions that the shooting … is not to be referred to the IPCC and that they will be given no access to the scene at the present time. The investigation will be carried out by the Met's own Directorate of Professional Standards. This investigation will be rigorous but subordinate to the needs of the counter-terrorism operation."<ref name="Blair letter"/></blockquote> |
| − | |||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 6 September 2010
This article is part of the Counter-Terrorism Portal project of Spinwatch. |
Jean Charles De Menezes (born 1978) was a Brazilian migrant electrician who was shot and killed by armed officers at Stockwell Tube station on 22 July 2005 after being mistaken as one of the four 21/7 suicide bombers.
He was shot 7 times in the head and once in the shoulder at point-blank range. Nobody has ever been held responsible for his death.[1]
His death was the first under the 2001 Operation Kratos strategy.
The death and reporting of the tragedy of Menezes' shooting, argued his lawyers, was wrapped in a shroud of misinformation.[2]
Defence of Shooting
Sir Ian Blair, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, defended the shooting of Menezes by stating that if the police did not shoot him, they would have faced the risk of “certain death”[3]
Ian Blair wrote to the Home Office permanent Secretary Sir John Gieve one day after Menezes was killed and stated that he sought to “maximise the legal protection for officers” who were exercising shoot-to-kill powers. He stated that the environment that faced officers meant that they could not “risk the kind of containment and negotiation tactics” that would be normally expected of them. “The only choice an officer may have may be to shoot-to-kill in order to prevent the detonation of a device.”[4] He also stated that while officers had protection under Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act (reasonable use of force in the specific circumstance) he did “not seek" to "exempt" them from the investigation or prosecution if evidence against them existed. Nevertheless, he stated that he was “confident” that the prosecuting authorities would understand “the pressures under which the (SO19 Unit) operates in terrorist scenarios”.[4]
Attempts to Prevent IPCC Inquiry
Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service refused to reveal the tactics that were employed in the shooting of Menezes to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and tried to block an independent investigation being launched by the IPCC. He stated that even though:
"... there is much concern about revealing … the tactics [of the police] and [the information they are operating upon], I believe that, in a fast-moving, multi-site terrorist situation, in which suicide bombers are clearly a very strong possibility, a chief officer of police should be able to suspend S.17 of the Police Reform Act 2002, which requires us to supply all information that the Independent Police Complaints Commission may require … I have therefore given instructions that the shooting … is not to be referred to the IPCC and that they will be given no access to the scene at the present time. The investigation will be carried out by the Met's own Directorate of Professional Standards. This investigation will be rigorous but subordinate to the needs of the counter-terrorism operation."[4]
Resources
- Justice for Jean campaign website
- Letter from Sir Ian Blair to Home Office Permanent Secretary Sir John Gieve relating to the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes
Notes
- ↑ The Jean Charles de Menezes Family Campaign, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ Harriet Wistrich and Gareth Peirce, Press Statement 2: Response to the evidence made public during the last 24 hours as to the true circumstances of the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, 17 August 2005, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ Gordon Rayner, ‘The shot Brazilian was here with a fake visa’, The Daily Mail, 29 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 06.09.10
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Commissioner's letter to The Home Office, Metropolitan Police Service, 30 September 2005, accessed 06.09.10
