Difference between revisions of "Dieter Helm"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{NuclearNavbar}}
 
{{NuclearNavbar}}
  
[[Image:helm.jpg]]
+
<div
 +
style="float:right;width: 110px;margin:0 0 1em 1em">
 +
[[Image:helm.jpg|110px|right|thumb]] ''Dieter Helm''
 +
</div>
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
Line 19: Line 22:
 
His perspectives have been used by the pro-nuclear forces to argue their case. For example, the [[Nuclear Industry Association]] picked up on Helm's comments to the programme "If":  
 
His perspectives have been used by the pro-nuclear forces to argue their case. For example, the [[Nuclear Industry Association]] picked up on Helm's comments to the programme "If":  
  
"Under the present arrangements no one is directly responsible for ensuring that the lights stay on. As Dieter Helm remarked at the conclusion of the film, 'If you want the lights to stay on, if you want security of supply, if you want what a modern economy needs you have to be absolutely clear what your priorities are, who has the right powers and how they will be exercised, then the market works. But we’re a long way from that point yet, and that is the challenge that should be at the DTI’s door morning noon and night.'
+
"Under the present arrangements no one is directly responsible for ensuring that the lights stay on. As Dieter Helm remarked at the conclusion of the film, 'If you want the lights to stay on, if you want security of supply, if you want what a modern economy needs you have to be absolutely clear what your priorities are, who has the right powers and how they will be exercised, then the market works. But we&#39;re a long way from that point yet, and that is the challenge that should be at the DTI&#39;s door morning noon and night.'
  
 
"In conjunction with the programme, which was watched by 2.8 million people, the BBC posed the question, 'Should Britain keep nuclear power?' on their website. The results shown here reveal that more people than might be expected are heeding 'the wake-up call'." {{ref|nia}} [[Bernard Ingham]] also quoted Helm in January 2006. {{ref|sone}}
 
"In conjunction with the programme, which was watched by 2.8 million people, the BBC posed the question, 'Should Britain keep nuclear power?' on their website. The results shown here reveal that more people than might be expected are heeding 'the wake-up call'." {{ref|nia}} [[Bernard Ingham]] also quoted Helm in January 2006. {{ref|sone}}
Line 26: Line 29:
  
 
Helm is also due to speak at a [[BNES]] event in March 2006, called "Securing the Future -
 
Helm is also due to speak at a [[BNES]] event in March 2006, called "Securing the Future -
The Role of Nuclear Energy� sponsored by the [[World Nuclear Association]], [[Nuclear Industry Association]], and [[UKAEA]] and co-organised by the [[Institution of Nuclear Engineers]]. {{ref|bnes}}
+
The Role of Nuclear Energy&#39; sponsored by the [[World Nuclear Association]], [[Nuclear Industry Association]], and [[UKAEA]] and co-organised by the [[Institution of Nuclear Engineers]]. {{ref|bnes}}
  
 
He is due to speak at the Adam Smith Institute's inaugural "Nuclear Industry Forum" in May 2006 along with:
 
He is due to speak at the Adam Smith Institute's inaugural "Nuclear Industry Forum" in May 2006 along with:

Revision as of 11:28, 10 March 2006


Helm.jpg
Dieter Helm

Background

One of the founders of the economic consultancy, Oxera. Helm is a non-executive director of Oxera Holdings Limited, parent company of Oxera Consulting Limited; a Director of Helm Associates Ltd; and a Fellow in Economics, New College, University of Oxford. [1]

Influential Committees

Helm is on the Prime Minister's Council for Science and Technology, is the Chair of Defra's Academic Panel; as well as being on the DTI's Sustainable Energy Panel Advisory Board, and the Ministerial Task Force on Sustainable Development. [2]

Influential Voice

Helm is a key advisor to the government on energy policy, and is said by government insiders to be close to Geoffrey Norris, Blair's key pro-nuclear advisor. Experts say that Helm has consistently attacked renewables and energy reduction scenarios as being ineffective tools to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions and security of supply.

In the past, he has also said that British consumers should have been forced to buy nuclear power in order to save the "stricken generator British Energy and protect the struggling nuclear industry". [3]

His perspectives have been used by the pro-nuclear forces to argue their case. For example, the Nuclear Industry Association picked up on Helm's comments to the programme "If":

"Under the present arrangements no one is directly responsible for ensuring that the lights stay on. As Dieter Helm remarked at the conclusion of the film, 'If you want the lights to stay on, if you want security of supply, if you want what a modern economy needs you have to be absolutely clear what your priorities are, who has the right powers and how they will be exercised, then the market works. But we're a long way from that point yet, and that is the challenge that should be at the DTI's door morning noon and night.'

"In conjunction with the programme, which was watched by 2.8 million people, the BBC posed the question, 'Should Britain keep nuclear power?' on their website. The results shown here reveal that more people than might be expected are heeding 'the wake-up call'." [4] Bernard Ingham also quoted Helm in January 2006. [5]

The Nuclear Conference Circuit

Helm is also due to speak at a BNES event in March 2006, called "Securing the Future - The Role of Nuclear Energy' sponsored by the World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Industry Association, and UKAEA and co-organised by the Institution of Nuclear Engineers. [6]

He is due to speak at the Adam Smith Institute's inaugural "Nuclear Industry Forum" in May 2006 along with:

External Links