Sue Ion

This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch.

Sue Ion

Background

Sue Ion began working at [[BNFL in 1979 and from 1992 until xxxx was BNFL's Executive Director of Technology. She was BNFL's most senior female employee controlling an annual research and development (R&D) budget of about £80 million and some 1000 employees.

She is a long-term advocate of nuclear power. "I got a prize at O-level and chose a book on nuclear power. I've always seen it as a high-tech, forward-looking industry that benefits mankind", she says.

An influential voice

She is the President of the British Nuclear Energy Society. Ion also represents the UK on a number of international review and oversight committees including the International Atomic Energy Agency, Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Energy and the Euratom Science and Technology Committee.

She is currently Vice President of the UK's Royal Academy of Engineering and on the UK Government's Council for Science and Technology.

We can't keep the lights on without nuclear

In October 2011 Ion was a guest speaker at an Institute of Ideas’ Battle of Ideas festival event organised in association with the Manchester Salon, Manchester Science Festival and The John Rylands University Library, University of Manchester. At an event entitled, 'Fukushima Fallout Battle Satellite' Ion argued stridently that despite "the media intent to report a nuclear catastrophe" in reality, the catastrophe in Japan was one caused by a tsunami and earthquake, "and NOT anything to do with the nuclear reactors and radiation at Fukushima".

The disaster at Fukiushima was no reason, she said, to abandon plans for new nuclear build in the UK. Particularly, as she argued, "renewable energy sources are not sufficient to meet our needs. In terms of engineering reality they cannot be delivered on the scale required and the sooner we examine the practicalities of what can be achieved, and what we must therefore also plan to do, the better. When you do the sums it becomes obvious that nuclear power is essential for the foreseeable future in significant quantities in the UK energy mix to guarantee security and affordability of supply.

In the post Fukushima era we should still have confidence that nuclear energy can be a safe secure affordable form of energy for the 21st century and that the new modern plants available today should be a significant component of the UK’s energy mix for the foreseeable future. In the very cold days of last winter, nuclear energy was our main source of low carbon electricity. It provided ~18% of the UK’s requirements; 16% from our own stations and a further 2% imported from France. Almost all the rest was provided from power stations burning fossil fuel. We cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy. Since most of our existing reactors retire over the next decade and a half, it is vital we get on with building new ones to replace them.

Affiliations

• Fellow of Royal Academy of Engineering

External resources=

• Why we cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy, Independent Blogs,

Battle of Ideas, 24 October 2011 at 6:00 am, accessed 2 September 2011