Difference between revisions of "Sue Ion"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:NuclearSpin}} | {{Template:NuclearSpin}} | ||
[[Image:ion.jpg|150px|right|thumb|Sue Ion]] | [[Image:ion.jpg|150px|right|thumb|Sue Ion]] | ||
| − | '''Dame Sue Ion''' is considered one of the UK's leading nuclear fuel experts. She is a visiting professor at [[Imperial College]], London and a non-executive director on the board of the [[UK Health and Safety Laboratory]]. She also chairs the UK’s Fusion Advisory for the Research Council. <ref> | + | '''Dame Sue Ion''' is considered one of the UK's leading nuclear fuel experts. She is a visiting professor at [[Imperial College]], London and a non-executive director on the board of the [[UK Health and Safety Laboratory]]. She also chairs the UK’s Fusion Advisory for the Research Council. <ref name="veteran"> Ellie Zolfagharifard, [http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/interviews/dame-sue-ion-veteran-nuclear-fuels-expert/1002072.article Dame Sue Ion, veteran nuclear fuels expert], The Engineer, 4 May 2010, accessed 2 September 2012 </ref> |
| − | In 2010 Ion was awarded the title of Dame in the New Year’s Honours List for her services to science and engineering. | + | In 2010 Ion was awarded the title of Dame in the New Year’s Honours List for her services to science and engineering. <ref name="veteran"/> |
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
She is a long-term advocate of nuclear power. "I got a prize at O-level and chose a book on nuclear power. I've always seen it as a high-tech, forward-looking industry that benefits mankind", she says. <ref>British Council, [http://www.britishcouncil.org/science-testimonials-sue-ion.htm Profile of Ion in its Website]</ref> | She is a long-term advocate of nuclear power. "I got a prize at O-level and chose a book on nuclear power. I've always seen it as a high-tech, forward-looking industry that benefits mankind", she says. <ref>British Council, [http://www.britishcouncil.org/science-testimonials-sue-ion.htm Profile of Ion in its Website]</ref> | ||
| − | |||
== An influential voice== | == An influential voice== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
After leaving BNFL in 2006 Ion advised former prime minister [[Gordon Brown]] on long-term strategic policies as a member of the UK Government's [[Council for Science and Technology]], on which she remained until December 2010.<ref>Council for Science and Technology, [http://www.cst.gov.uk/cst/about/members.shtml#ion Biography of Ion on its Website - now removed] and [http://www.cst.gov.uk/cst/about-cst/past-memb Past members], acc 2 Sept 2012</ref> | After leaving BNFL in 2006 Ion advised former prime minister [[Gordon Brown]] on long-term strategic policies as a member of the UK Government's [[Council for Science and Technology]], on which she remained until December 2010.<ref>Council for Science and Technology, [http://www.cst.gov.uk/cst/about/members.shtml#ion Biography of Ion on its Website - now removed] and [http://www.cst.gov.uk/cst/about-cst/past-memb Past members], acc 2 Sept 2012</ref> | ||
| − | + | She is the President of the [[British Nuclear Energy Society]] and represents the UK on a number of international review and oversight committees including the [[International Atomic Energy Agency]], Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Energy and the [[Euratom]] Science and Technology Committee. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Ion has argued that an "engineering reality check" is needed by those who oppose new nuclear build. | |
| + | :If you want large quantities of electricity, we are still going to have a very significant number of nuclear power stations on the grid...To believe that wind power can displace nuclear generation as a means to deliver large quantities of safe baseload electricity is living in cloud cuckoo land. We need both.<ref name="veteran"/> | ||
==We can't keep the lights on without nuclear== | ==We can't keep the lights on without nuclear== | ||
In October 2011 Ion was a guest speaker at an [[Institute of Ideas]]’ Battle of Ideas festival event organised in association with the [[Manchester Salon]], [[Manchester Science Festival]] and The John Rylands University Library, [[University of Manchester]]. At an event entitled, 'Fukushima Fallout Battle Satellite' Ion argued stridently that despite "the media intent to report a nuclear catastrophe" in reality, the catastrophe in Japan was one caused by a tsunami and earthquake, "and NOT anything to do with the nuclear reactors and radiation at Fukushima". | In October 2011 Ion was a guest speaker at an [[Institute of Ideas]]’ Battle of Ideas festival event organised in association with the [[Manchester Salon]], [[Manchester Science Festival]] and The John Rylands University Library, [[University of Manchester]]. At an event entitled, 'Fukushima Fallout Battle Satellite' Ion argued stridently that despite "the media intent to report a nuclear catastrophe" in reality, the catastrophe in Japan was one caused by a tsunami and earthquake, "and NOT anything to do with the nuclear reactors and radiation at Fukushima". | ||
| − | + | Fukushima was no reason, she said, to abandon plans for new nuclear build in the UK. Particularly, as she argued, "renewable energy sources are not sufficient to meet our needs. In terms of engineering reality they cannot be delivered on the scale required and the sooner we examine the practicalities of what can be achieved, and what we must therefore also plan to do, the better. When you do the sums it becomes obvious that nuclear power is essential for the foreseeable future in significant quantities in the UK energy mix to guarantee security and affordability of supply. | |
:In the post Fukushima era we should still have confidence that nuclear energy can be a safe secure affordable form of energy for the 21st century and that the new modern plants available today should be a significant component of the UK’s energy mix for the foreseeable future. In the very cold days of last winter, nuclear energy was our main source of low carbon electricity. It provided ~18% of the UK’s requirements; 16% from our own stations and a further 2% imported from France. Almost all the rest was provided from power stations burning fossil fuel. We cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy. Since most of our existing reactors retire over the next decade and a half, it is vital we get on with building new ones to replace them. | :In the post Fukushima era we should still have confidence that nuclear energy can be a safe secure affordable form of energy for the 21st century and that the new modern plants available today should be a significant component of the UK’s energy mix for the foreseeable future. In the very cold days of last winter, nuclear energy was our main source of low carbon electricity. It provided ~18% of the UK’s requirements; 16% from our own stations and a further 2% imported from France. Almost all the rest was provided from power stations burning fossil fuel. We cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy. Since most of our existing reactors retire over the next decade and a half, it is vital we get on with building new ones to replace them. | ||
| + | ==Affiliations== | ||
| + | *Fellow of and former vice president of the [[Royal Academy of Engineering]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External resources=== | ==External resources=== | ||
*[http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/10/24/why-we-cannot-keep-the-lights-on-without-nuclear-energy/ Why we cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy], Independent Blogs, | *[http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/10/24/why-we-cannot-keep-the-lights-on-without-nuclear-energy/ Why we cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy], Independent Blogs, | ||
Revision as of 06:04, 2 September 2012
|
This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch. |
Dame Sue Ion is considered one of the UK's leading nuclear fuel experts. She is a visiting professor at Imperial College, London and a non-executive director on the board of the UK Health and Safety Laboratory. She also chairs the UK’s Fusion Advisory for the Research Council. [1]
In 2010 Ion was awarded the title of Dame in the New Year’s Honours List for her services to science and engineering. [1]
Contents
Background
Sue Ion began working at British Nuclear Fuels Limited in 1979 and was BNFL's Executive Director of Technology from 1992 until 2006. She was BNFL's most senior female employee, controlling an annual research and development (R&D) budget of about £80 million and some 1000 employees.
She is a long-term advocate of nuclear power. "I got a prize at O-level and chose a book on nuclear power. I've always seen it as a high-tech, forward-looking industry that benefits mankind", she says. [2]
An influential voice
After leaving BNFL in 2006 Ion advised former prime minister Gordon Brown on long-term strategic policies as a member of the UK Government's Council for Science and Technology, on which she remained until December 2010.[3]
She is the President of the British Nuclear Energy Society and represents the UK on a number of international review and oversight committees including the International Atomic Energy Agency, Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Energy and the Euratom Science and Technology Committee.
Ion has argued that an "engineering reality check" is needed by those who oppose new nuclear build.
- If you want large quantities of electricity, we are still going to have a very significant number of nuclear power stations on the grid...To believe that wind power can displace nuclear generation as a means to deliver large quantities of safe baseload electricity is living in cloud cuckoo land. We need both.[1]
We can't keep the lights on without nuclear
In October 2011 Ion was a guest speaker at an Institute of Ideas’ Battle of Ideas festival event organised in association with the Manchester Salon, Manchester Science Festival and The John Rylands University Library, University of Manchester. At an event entitled, 'Fukushima Fallout Battle Satellite' Ion argued stridently that despite "the media intent to report a nuclear catastrophe" in reality, the catastrophe in Japan was one caused by a tsunami and earthquake, "and NOT anything to do with the nuclear reactors and radiation at Fukushima".
Fukushima was no reason, she said, to abandon plans for new nuclear build in the UK. Particularly, as she argued, "renewable energy sources are not sufficient to meet our needs. In terms of engineering reality they cannot be delivered on the scale required and the sooner we examine the practicalities of what can be achieved, and what we must therefore also plan to do, the better. When you do the sums it becomes obvious that nuclear power is essential for the foreseeable future in significant quantities in the UK energy mix to guarantee security and affordability of supply.
- In the post Fukushima era we should still have confidence that nuclear energy can be a safe secure affordable form of energy for the 21st century and that the new modern plants available today should be a significant component of the UK’s energy mix for the foreseeable future. In the very cold days of last winter, nuclear energy was our main source of low carbon electricity. It provided ~18% of the UK’s requirements; 16% from our own stations and a further 2% imported from France. Almost all the rest was provided from power stations burning fossil fuel. We cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy. Since most of our existing reactors retire over the next decade and a half, it is vital we get on with building new ones to replace them.
Affiliations
- Fellow of and former vice president of the Royal Academy of Engineering
External resources=
- Why we cannot keep the lights on without nuclear energy, Independent Blogs,
Battle of Ideas, 24 October 2011 at 6:00 am, accessed 2 September 2011
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ellie Zolfagharifard, Dame Sue Ion, veteran nuclear fuels expert, The Engineer, 4 May 2010, accessed 2 September 2012
- ↑ British Council, Profile of Ion in its Website
- ↑ Council for Science and Technology, Biography of Ion on its Website - now removed and Past members, acc 2 Sept 2012
