Difference between revisions of "Chris Brand chronology"
(→October 1999) |
m (→Order of Events) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=Order of Events= | =Order of Events= | ||
| − | ==April | + | ==1996== |
| + | ===April=== | ||
'''14 April 1996''' | '''14 April 1996''' | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
Professor Robert Grieve, Head of Department, insists that Brand will continue to lecture at the university although provisions have been made for those students boycotting his lectures.<ref>Laure Peek, SRC acts against "racist" lecturer, ''Student'', p. 2, 25 April 1996</ref> | Professor Robert Grieve, Head of Department, insists that Brand will continue to lecture at the university although provisions have been made for those students boycotting his lectures.<ref>Laure Peek, SRC acts against "racist" lecturer, ''Student'', p. 2, 25 April 1996</ref> | ||
| − | ==June | + | ===June=== |
'''1 June 1996''' | '''1 June 1996''' | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
[[Hugh Peto]] and [[Fiona McEwan]], two students of Edinburgh University, write a letter to ''The Scotsman'' claiming academic freedom is being undermined by the university inquiry looking into Chris Brand's conduct. In the letter they state "What is being recommended is an atmosphere in which the expression of strongly-held points of view is unacceptable. This is a much more dangerous outcome than any of Mr Brand's ideas."<ref>Hugh Peto & Fiona McEwan, Academic freedom 'being undermined', ''The Scotsman'', p. 14, 5 June 1996</ref> | [[Hugh Peto]] and [[Fiona McEwan]], two students of Edinburgh University, write a letter to ''The Scotsman'' claiming academic freedom is being undermined by the university inquiry looking into Chris Brand's conduct. In the letter they state "What is being recommended is an atmosphere in which the expression of strongly-held points of view is unacceptable. This is a much more dangerous outcome than any of Mr Brand's ideas."<ref>Hugh Peto & Fiona McEwan, Academic freedom 'being undermined', ''The Scotsman'', p. 14, 5 June 1996</ref> | ||
| − | ==August | + | ===August=== |
'''22 August 1996''' | '''22 August 1996''' | ||
| Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
A debate involving [[Chris Brand]] is called off after police expressed fears for public safety. A 50 strong group of Anti-Nazi protesters picketed the Cyberia Cafe on Hanover Street, Edinburgh. Brand had been due to debate with [[Kenan Malik]] (of the [[LM network]]) and [[Marek Kohn]]. Malik said "We condemn the Anti-Nazi League for its attempt to suppress free speech."<ref>Robert McNeil, Police call off Brand debate after protests from anti-Nazis, ''The Scotsman'', p. 8, 23 August 1996</ref> | A debate involving [[Chris Brand]] is called off after police expressed fears for public safety. A 50 strong group of Anti-Nazi protesters picketed the Cyberia Cafe on Hanover Street, Edinburgh. Brand had been due to debate with [[Kenan Malik]] (of the [[LM network]]) and [[Marek Kohn]]. Malik said "We condemn the Anti-Nazi League for its attempt to suppress free speech."<ref>Robert McNeil, Police call off Brand debate after protests from anti-Nazis, ''The Scotsman'', p. 8, 23 August 1996</ref> | ||
| − | ==October | + | ===October=== |
'''11 October 1996''' | '''11 October 1996''' | ||
| Line 67: | Line 68: | ||
''The Student'' reports that [[Chris Brand]] has refused an offer by Rev Iain Whyte, the university chaplain, to act as mediator between Brand and the university. Brand said "I won't waste my time on people who don't do their homework. He has got to read what I have said."<ref>Alexander Caish & Emma Haddad, Brand new witch hint, ''Student'', p. 2, 31 October 1996</ref> | ''The Student'' reports that [[Chris Brand]] has refused an offer by Rev Iain Whyte, the university chaplain, to act as mediator between Brand and the university. Brand said "I won't waste my time on people who don't do their homework. He has got to read what I have said."<ref>Alexander Caish & Emma Haddad, Brand new witch hint, ''Student'', p. 2, 31 October 1996</ref> | ||
| − | ==November | + | ===November=== |
'''1 November 1996''' | '''1 November 1996''' | ||
| Line 85: | Line 86: | ||
Brand hits out at “the hysterical forces of political correctness in the Scottish media”, accusing them of waging a smear campaign against him.<ref>Chris Barry, Child sex row academic slams 'smear campaign', ''Press Association'', 9 November 1996</ref> | Brand hits out at “the hysterical forces of political correctness in the Scottish media”, accusing them of waging a smear campaign against him.<ref>Chris Barry, Child sex row academic slams 'smear campaign', ''Press Association'', 9 November 1996</ref> | ||
| − | ==February | + | ==1997== |
| + | |||
| + | ===February=== | ||
'''6 February 1997''' | '''6 February 1997''' | ||
| Line 95: | Line 98: | ||
In an opinion piece discussing freedom of speech for ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', [[Jennie Bristow]] refers to the [[Chris Brand]] affair stating “The high-profile silencing of psychology lecturer and self-confessed 'scientific racist' Chris Brand in March 1996 is a case in point. The number of restrictions on prejudiced language in colleges means that many students' unions are unable even to pay lip-service to the absolute right to freedom of speech.”<ref>Jennie Bristow, A sledgehammer to crack a ridiculous nut, ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 12, 7 February 1997</ref> | In an opinion piece discussing freedom of speech for ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', [[Jennie Bristow]] refers to the [[Chris Brand]] affair stating “The high-profile silencing of psychology lecturer and self-confessed 'scientific racist' Chris Brand in March 1996 is a case in point. The number of restrictions on prejudiced language in colleges means that many students' unions are unable even to pay lip-service to the absolute right to freedom of speech.”<ref>Jennie Bristow, A sledgehammer to crack a ridiculous nut, ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 12, 7 February 1997</ref> | ||
| − | ==May | + | ===May=== |
'''1 May 1997''' | '''1 May 1997''' | ||
| Line 109: | Line 112: | ||
The Edinburgh University tribunal is adjourned to a later date after failing to complete the hearing in time. [[Chris Brand]] remains suspended from teaching and administration.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=100866§ioncode=26 Chris Brand tribunal adjourned], ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 6, 9 May 1997</ref> | The Edinburgh University tribunal is adjourned to a later date after failing to complete the hearing in time. [[Chris Brand]] remains suspended from teaching and administration.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=100866§ioncode=26 Chris Brand tribunal adjourned], ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 6, 9 May 1997</ref> | ||
| − | ==August | + | ===August=== |
'''8 August 1997''' | '''8 August 1997''' | ||
| Line 127: | Line 130: | ||
[[Chris Brand]] accuses the Edinburgh University tribunal of running a “kangaroo court”, denying him his freedom of speech. Brand indicates that he would appeal the tribunal’s decision.<ref>David Steele, [http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/lecturer-to-appeal-1.384518 Lecturer to appeal], ''The Herald (Glasgow)'', p. 8, 15 August 1997</ref> | [[Chris Brand]] accuses the Edinburgh University tribunal of running a “kangaroo court”, denying him his freedom of speech. Brand indicates that he would appeal the tribunal’s decision.<ref>David Steele, [http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/lecturer-to-appeal-1.384518 Lecturer to appeal], ''The Herald (Glasgow)'', p. 8, 15 August 1997</ref> | ||
| − | ==September | + | ===September=== |
'''5 September 1997''' | '''5 September 1997''' | ||
| Line 133: | Line 136: | ||
[[Chris Brand]]’s lawyers lodge appeal against his dismissal from Edinburgh University.<ref>Jennifer Veitch, Brand challenges sacking for child sex comments, ''The Scotsman'', p. 10, 6 September 1997</ref> | [[Chris Brand]]’s lawyers lodge appeal against his dismissal from Edinburgh University.<ref>Jennifer Veitch, Brand challenges sacking for child sex comments, ''The Scotsman'', p. 10, 6 September 1997</ref> | ||
| − | ==November | + | ===November=== |
'''14 November 1997''' | '''14 November 1997''' | ||
| Line 139: | Line 142: | ||
Gordon Coutts QC is appointed to hear an appeal by [[Chris Brand]] against his dismissal from Edinburgh University back in August 1997.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=104621§ioncode=26 QC to hear Brand's appeal], ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 2, 14 November 1997</ref> | Gordon Coutts QC is appointed to hear an appeal by [[Chris Brand]] against his dismissal from Edinburgh University back in August 1997.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=104621§ioncode=26 QC to hear Brand's appeal], ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', p. 2, 14 November 1997</ref> | ||
| − | ==February | + | ==1998== |
| + | |||
| + | ===February=== | ||
'''5 February 1998''' | '''5 February 1998''' | ||
| Line 151: | Line 156: | ||
[[Chris Brand]] states that if he wins his appeal against his dismissal he will return to Edinburgh University in defence of academic freedom<ref>Lecturer's vow over appeal, ''Evening News (London)'', p. 3, 10 February 1998</ref>. The two-day internal appeal was presided over by Gordon Coutts QC. <ref>Marie Shar, Child sex-row lecturer starts battle to win his job back, ''The Scotsman'', p. 12, 10 February 1998</ref> | [[Chris Brand]] states that if he wins his appeal against his dismissal he will return to Edinburgh University in defence of academic freedom<ref>Lecturer's vow over appeal, ''Evening News (London)'', p. 3, 10 February 1998</ref>. The two-day internal appeal was presided over by Gordon Coutts QC. <ref>Marie Shar, Child sex-row lecturer starts battle to win his job back, ''The Scotsman'', p. 12, 10 February 1998</ref> | ||
| − | ==March | + | ===March=== |
'''24 March 1998''' | '''24 March 1998''' | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 29 July 2011
Christopher Richard Brand (born in Preston, England, 1 June 1943) is a British psychological and psychometric researcher. He was a lecturer of psychology at Edinburgh University when he made controversial claims that black people were less intelligent than whites and that some forms of child sex were not harmful.[1]
Below is a comprehensive chronology of the Chris Brand affair at Edinburgh University.
Contents
Order of Events
1996
April
14 April 1996
Chris Brand, a lecturer of psychology at the University of Edinburgh, causes controversy when he is quoted in the Independent on Sunday as saying “It is scientific fact that black Americans are less intelligent than white Americans and the IQ of Asians is higher than blacks.”[2]
18 April 1996
Brand’s book ‘The g Factor’, due to be published on 18 April 1996, is withdrawn by publishers John Wiley & Sons after his comments were published in the Independent on Sunday. John Wiley & Sons state that Chris Brand’s assertions in his new book are “repellant”.[3]
Student, Edinburgh University’s student newspaper run a front page story on the Chris Brand affair, with the headline ‘SACK HIM! - Student fury as Uni backs “racist” lecturer’. The article states that students have boycotted some of Brand’s lectures and despite widespread condemnation of Brand’s comments, the University is still backing Brand.[4]
22 April 1996
The Guardian reveals that Chris Brand is to be dropped from his position as a consultant psychologist for Lothian and Borders police. On expiry, Mr Brand’s contract would not be renewed.[5]
23-24 April 1996
Students at Edinburgh University begin discussions on boycotting[6] Brand’s lectures and on how to apply pressure on the university to ban him.[7]
25 April 1996
The Student’s Representative Council unanimously ratifies a motion calling on Edinburgh University to sack Chris Brand over his comments. Speaking of the ratification of the motion, Catherine Bromley, Vice-President Representation of EUSA, stated “This is very welcome. It is time for us to take a strong and resolved stance on this issue. I am confident that the University will listen carefully to our requests. What remains paramount is that the needs and desires of the students are met, and their confidence in their department is restored.”
Professor Robert Grieve, Head of Department, insists that Brand will continue to lecture at the university although provisions have been made for those students boycotting his lectures.[8]
June
1 June 1996
After a month long inquiry by the University of Edinburgh, Chris Brand is instructed to change his teaching style. Professor Sir Stewart Sutherland states that whilst he supports academic freedom, such freedom brings responsibilities, such as a need for positive relationships with students and a balanced and competent teaching style. Chris Brand dismisses the inquiry as a “witchhunt”.[9]
5 June 1996
Hugh Peto and Fiona McEwan, two students of Edinburgh University, write a letter to The Scotsman claiming academic freedom is being undermined by the university inquiry looking into Chris Brand's conduct. In the letter they state "What is being recommended is an atmosphere in which the expression of strongly-held points of view is unacceptable. This is a much more dangerous outcome than any of Mr Brand's ideas."[10]
August
22 August 1996
A debate involving Chris Brand is called off after police expressed fears for public safety. A 50 strong group of Anti-Nazi protesters picketed the Cyberia Cafe on Hanover Street, Edinburgh. Brand had been due to debate with Kenan Malik (of the LM network) and Marek Kohn. Malik said "We condemn the Anti-Nazi League for its attempt to suppress free speech."[11]
October
11 October 1996
Chris Brand is appointed head of the Psychology Departments Ethics Committee, sparking more outrage from students regarding Edinburgh University’s handling of the affair.[12]
17 October 1996
The Student reports that Chris Brand has been dropped as head of the Edinburgh Psychology Department’s Ethics Committee, just ten days after he had been given the role. The article goes on to say that Brand is however to remain a member of the committee. Edinburgh University Rector, Dr Malcom Macleod said “I also welcome the acknowledgement that there was a failure of judgment at departmental level in making the original appointment, and I trust that lessons have been learned for the future.”[13]
24 October 1996
Students continue to protest against Edinburgh University’s refusal to sack Chris Brand. A petition condemning the university for allowing Brand, despite being removed as its head, to remain on the Psychology Department Ethics Committee and demanding his sacking, is signed by 500 students. The petition is presented to the principal of Edinburgh University, Professor Sir Stewart Sutherland by forty students, some members of the Anti-Nazi League.[14]
31 October 1996
Hugh Peto, a member of Revolutionary Communist Students writes to the Student, Edinburgh University’s student newspaper, arguing against the removal of Brand from the ethics committee. Peto states “What makes Brand different from the rest of the committee? Are they all angels themselves? Perhaps they are biologically superior?”[15]
The Student reports that Chris Brand has refused an offer by Rev Iain Whyte, the university chaplain, to act as mediator between Brand and the university. Brand said "I won't waste my time on people who don't do their homework. He has got to read what I have said."[16]
November
1 November 1996
Students disrupt a lecture by Chris Brand, resulting in its cancellation.
Rev Iain Whyte, chaplain at Edinburgh University, stated he sympathised with the view of the protesters. Rev Iain Whyte said: "There are a lot of African students at this university. How are they going to feel when they read views attributed to Mr Brand which include the opinion that Africa should be colonised by the less desirable members of our community?
"I have read the stuff he has put out on the (Internet) pages and the contempt he has for some ethnic minorities and single parents does raise questions about how he is as a teacher."[17]
8 November 1996
Chris Brand is suspended by Edinburgh University over comments he made regarding paedophile sex in an internet newsletter. In the newsletter Brand said "Non-violent paedophilia with a consenting partner over age 12 does no harm so long as the paedophiles and the partners are of above average IQ and educational level. As lead choirboy and soloist, I met lots of paedophiles who would press money into my horrid little palm at the age of 13.
"For better or worse I never fancied any of them nor did anything but allow a little fondling."[18]
Brand hits out at “the hysterical forces of political correctness in the Scottish media”, accusing them of waging a smear campaign against him.[19]
1997
February
6 February 1997
The Student carry a story relating to rumours that Chris Brand had been nominated for the position of rector at Edinburgh University. On speaking to Student, Edinburgh University's student newspaper, Brand explained how at first he thought his (purported) nomination may have been put forward by the Revolutionary Communist Students (RCS) who had consistently opposed the Anti-Nazi League’s protest campaign to oust him. The RCS campaigned against the anti-Brand protests on the basis of protecting freedom of speech. It transpired however that neither staff nor students could be nominated to the role of rector.[20] The purported nomination of Chris Brand for the position of rector was also mentioned in The Herald newspaper.[21]
7 February 1997
In an opinion piece discussing freedom of speech for The Times Higher Education Supplement, Jennie Bristow refers to the Chris Brand affair stating “The high-profile silencing of psychology lecturer and self-confessed 'scientific racist' Chris Brand in March 1996 is a case in point. The number of restrictions on prejudiced language in colleges means that many students' unions are unable even to pay lip-service to the absolute right to freedom of speech.”[22]
May
1 May 1997
Speaking on the eve of the Edinburgh University tribunal, Chris Brand states “The university is basically going to decide whether it will allow the right to free speech or if it is running some sort of low-grade holiday camp.”[23]
2 May 1997
The Edinburgh University tribunal looking into Chris Brand’s conduct begins. A university spokeswoman wouldn’t reveal the precise charges, stating only that they are “related to aspects of Mr Brand’s conduct.”[24]
9 May 1997
The Edinburgh University tribunal is adjourned to a later date after failing to complete the hearing in time. Chris Brand remains suspended from teaching and administration.[25]
August
8 August 1997
A university tribunal finds Chris Brand guilty of gross misconduct and he is sacked from his position at the University of Edinburgh. Brand’s claims that Internet paedophilia was acceptable, as long as the child had an above average intelligence and over 12 years of age, were described as “disgraceful” by the then principle of the university, Professor Sir Stewart Sutherland.[26]
Chris Brand states "I will certainly be looking at an appeal in some form or another within the next 28 days."[27]
11 August 1997
Chris Brand accuses the Principal of Edinburgh University, Sir Stewart Sutherland, of waging a witch-hunt against him, claiming “He has been out to get me.”
Three students, Fiona McEwen, Hugh Peto and Alastair Fraser claim “the witch-hunt against Brand marks a milestone in the “dumbing-down” of university life. It is now official university policy to protect students from unconventional or offensive ideas.”[28]
14 August 1997
Chris Brand accuses the Edinburgh University tribunal of running a “kangaroo court”, denying him his freedom of speech. Brand indicates that he would appeal the tribunal’s decision.[29]
September
5 September 1997
Chris Brand’s lawyers lodge appeal against his dismissal from Edinburgh University.[30]
November
14 November 1997
Gordon Coutts QC is appointed to hear an appeal by Chris Brand against his dismissal from Edinburgh University back in August 1997.[31]
1998
February
5 February 1998
A group of academics come out in support of Chris Brand, condemning his dismissal as an attack on academic freedom, causing an angry backlash from children’s organisations and students. The academics included Brand’s close friend Richard Lynn, a retired professor from the University of Ulster. Also included was Dr Glenn Wilson of the Institute of Psychiatry, London. Dr Wilson himself courted controversy in 1994 when he claimed women were not genetically equipped to hold top jobs.[32]
A spokesman for The Scottish People Against Child Abusers group said “Just because he is an academic does not give him carte blanche to spout any nonsense and get away with it.”[33]
10 February 1998
Chris Brand states that if he wins his appeal against his dismissal he will return to Edinburgh University in defence of academic freedom[34]. The two-day internal appeal was presided over by Gordon Coutts QC. [35]
March
24 March 1998
Chris Brand loses his appeal against his dismissal by Edinburgh University. The appeal tribunal found Brand guilty of “gross misconduct”.[36]
1999
October
29 October 1999
Chris Brand is awarded a £12,000 settlement over his dismissal by former employer Edinburgh University.
The principal of Edinburgh University, Professor Sir Stewart Sutherland said "It is a somewhat sad reflection that, in circumstances where it has been exhaustively established that the university has taken the correct action, it should be necessary to make such a payment, simply to confirm the status quo.
"It appeared unavoidable, however, if the university was to minimise the costs of setting this matter to rest."[37]
Notes
- ↑ Julia Hinde, Branded an outcast, The Times Education Supplement, 15 August 1997
- ↑ Ros Wynne-Jones, 'Stupid blacks' book row, The Independent, 14 April 1996
- ↑ Gillian Bowditch, Publisher drops 'racist' IQ book, The Times, p. 3, 18 April 1996
- ↑ Laura Peek, SACK HIM - Student fury as Uni backs "racist" lecturer, Student, p. 1, 18 April 1996
- ↑ Stuart Millar, Police drop 'race lecturer', The Guardian, p. 6, 22 April 1996
- ↑ Maan joins race row, Evening Times (Glasgow), p. 15, 24 April 1996
- ↑ Uni ban call, Daily Record (Glasgow), p. 14, 24 April 1996
- ↑ Laure Peek, SRC acts against "racist" lecturer, Student, p. 2, 25 April 1996
- ↑ Graeme Wilson, University warning for academic, The Scotsman, p. 5, 1 June 1996
- ↑ Hugh Peto & Fiona McEwan, Academic freedom 'being undermined', The Scotsman, p. 14, 5 June 1996
- ↑ Robert McNeil, Police call off Brand debate after protests from anti-Nazis, The Scotsman, p. 8, 23 August 1996
- ↑ Racist in job row, Daily Record (Glasgow), p. 11, 12 October 1996
- ↑ Tom Gordon, Brand dropped from Ethics Committee, Student, p. 2, 17 October 1996
- ↑ Laura Peek, Branded - Students campaign for sacking of "sexist" race-row lecturer, Student, p. 3, 24 October 1996
- ↑ Hugh Peto, All Brand (again), Student, p. 10, 31 October 1996
- ↑ Alexander Caish & Emma Haddad, Brand new witch hint, Student, p. 2, 31 October 1996
- ↑ Alison Gray, Brand lecture abandoned after protest, The Scotsman, p. 4, 9 November 1996
- ↑ Luke Harding, Lecturer in race row suspended for defending paedophile sex, The Guardian (London), p. 2, 9 November 1996
- ↑ Chris Barry, Child sex row academic slams 'smear campaign', Press Association, 9 November 1996
- ↑ Russell Fallis, Brand in Rector Mystery, Student, p. 1-2, 6 February 1997
- ↑ News Digest, The Herald (Glasgow), 1 February 1997
- ↑ Jennie Bristow, A sledgehammer to crack a ridiculous nut, The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 12, 7 February 1997
- ↑ Andrew Walker, Child-sex lecturer faces sack, Daily Mail (London), p. 15, 1 May 1997
- ↑ Olga Wojtas, Child-sex lecturer faces sack, The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 1, 2 May 1997
- ↑ Chris Brand tribunal adjourned, The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 6, 9 May 1997
- ↑ Lucy Ward, Lecturer sacked for saying child sex 'harmless', The Independent, p. 2, 9 August 1997
- ↑ Matt Wells, I'll fight sacking says disgraced Brand, The Scotsman, p. 1, 9 August 1997
- ↑ Raymond Duncan, Principal accused of witch hunt, The Herald (Glasgow), p. 7, 11 August 1997
- ↑ David Steele, Lecturer to appeal, The Herald (Glasgow), p. 8, 15 August 1997
- ↑ Jennifer Veitch, Brand challenges sacking for child sex comments, The Scotsman, p. 10, 6 September 1997
- ↑ QC to hear Brand's appeal, The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 2, 14 November 1997
- ↑ Tom Little, Academics back lecturer sacked for sex comment, The Scotsman, p. 9, 5 February 1998
- ↑ Marie Sharp, Child sex row over move to save sacked lecturer's job, Daily Mail (London), p. 33, 6 February 1998
- ↑ Lecturer's vow over appeal, Evening News (London), p. 3, 10 February 1998
- ↑ Marie Shar, Child sex-row lecturer starts battle to win his job back, The Scotsman, p. 12, 10 February 1998
- ↑ Joe Quinn, Race row university man loses appeal against sacking, Press Association, 24 March 1998
- ↑ Andrew Walker, Lecturer sacked for backing child sex gets £12,000 payout, The Scotsman, p. 5, 29 October 1999
