Difference between revisions of "Jean Charles De Menezes"
(→Menezes Clothing) |
(→Menezes Clothing) |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
There was also the claim by Anthony Larkin, a passenger on the train where Menezes was shot, that Menezes was “wearing a bomb belt with wires coming out".<ref name="BBC initial report"/> | There was also the claim by Anthony Larkin, a passenger on the train where Menezes was shot, that Menezes was “wearing a bomb belt with wires coming out".<ref name="BBC initial report"/> | ||
| − | An eyewitness told the press that Menezes was wearing "a baseball cap ... and quite a thickish coat. It was a coat like you would wear in winter, a sort of padded jacket. But it looked out of place in the weather we've been having."<ref>Eyewitness Accounts: The chase, the shooting and the sense of shock, ''The Guardian'', 23 July 2005, aceesed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10</ref> | + | An eyewitness told the press that Menezes was wearing "a baseball cap ... and quite a thickish coat. It was a coat like you would wear in winter, a sort of padded jacket. But it looked out of place in the weather we've been having."<ref>Eyewitness Accounts: The chase, the shooting and the sense of shock, ''The Guardian'', 23 July 2005, aceesed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10</ref> According to other onlookers Menezes was "wearing a heavy winter coat in warm weather"<ref name="Mirror"/> |
It later emerged that accounts of him wearing a padded jacket and having a belt on with wires coming out were untrue. Menezes was in fact wearing light blue denim jeans and a light blue denim jacket.<ref>Mark Honigsbau, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/28/politics.july7 ‘Brazilian did not wear bulky jacket’], ''The Guardian'', 28 July 2005, accessed 06.09.10</ref> | It later emerged that accounts of him wearing a padded jacket and having a belt on with wires coming out were untrue. Menezes was in fact wearing light blue denim jeans and a light blue denim jacket.<ref>Mark Honigsbau, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/28/politics.july7 ‘Brazilian did not wear bulky jacket’], ''The Guardian'', 28 July 2005, accessed 06.09.10</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 7 September 2010
This article is part of the Counter-Terrorism Portal project of Spinwatch. |
Jean Charles De Menezes (born 1978) was a Brazilian man who was shot and killed by armed officers at Stockwell Tube station on 22 July 2005 after being mistaken as one of the four 21/7 suicide bombers.
He was shot 7 times in the head and once in the shoulder at point-blank range. Nobody has ever been held responsible for his death.[1]
The death and reporting of the tragedy of Menezes' shooting, argued his lawyers, was wrapped in a shroud of misinformation.[2]
His death was the first under the Operation Kratos strategy that was devised after the attacks of 9/11 and permitted "shoot-to-kill". After Menezes' death, the strategy was criticised but the Association of Chief Police Officers ruled in March 2006 it was fit for purpose and would therefore not be altered or amended. ACPO president, Sir Chris Fox in response to the ruling said he was "pleased" that the Operation Kratos strategy had been deemed "fit for purpose". [3]
Contents
Defence of Shooting
Sir Ian Blair, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, defended the shooting of Menezes by stating that if the police did not shoot him, they may have faced the risk of “certain death.”[4]
Ian Blair wrote to the Home Office permanent Secretary Sir John Gieve one day after Menezes was killed and stated that he sought to “maximise the legal protection for officers” who were exercising shoot-to-kill powers. He said the environment that faced officers meant they could not "risk the kind of containment and negotiation tactics” that would be normally expected of them. The only choice an officer may have may be to shoot-to-kill in order to prevent the detonation of a device."[5] He also stated that while officers had protection under Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act (reasonable use of force in the specific circumstance) he did “not seek" to "exempt" them from the investigation or prosecution if evidence against them existed. Nevertheless, he stated that he was “confident” that the prosecuting authorities would understand “the pressures under which the (CO19 Unit) operates in terrorist scenarios”.[5]
In response to the letter, Giovani da Silva - a lawyer acting for the De Menezes family stated that "these letters have shown Ian Blair has lied once again, not only to the family but to the public. Ian Blair has jumped the barrier of the law".[6]
Attempts to Prevent IPCC Inquiry
Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service refused to reveal the tactics that were employed in the shooting of Menezes to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and tried to block an independent investigation being launched by the IPCC. He stated that even though:
"... there is much concern about revealing … the tactics [of the police] and [the information they are operating upon], I believe that, in a fast-moving, multi-site terrorist situation, in which suicide bombers are clearly a very strong possibility, a chief officer of police should be able to suspend S.17 of the Police Reform Act 2002, which requires us to supply all information that the Independent Police Complaints Commission may require … I have therefore given instructions that the shooting … is not to be referred to the IPCC and that they will be given no access to the scene at the present time. The investigation will be carried out by the Met's own Directorate of Professional Standards. This investigation will be rigorous but subordinate to the needs of the counter-terrorism operation." [5]
Menezes Restrained When Shot
According to secret documents that were leaked, when Menezes was shot he had already been overpowered by a surveillance officer who had followed him from his flat in Brixton.[7] In other words, Menezes was shot 8 times even though he had been restrained by a police officer.
According to the surveillance officers account that restrained him:
"I heard shouting which included the word 'police' and turned to face the [Menezes] in the denim jacket … [Menezes] immediately stood up and advanced towards me and the [armed officers] ... I grabbed [Menezes] in the denim jacket by wrapping both my arms around his torso, pinning his arms to his side. I then pushed him back on to the seat where he had been previously sitting ... I then heard a gunshot very close to my left ear and was dragged away on to the floor of the carriage."[7]
Failure of Police to Identify Menezes
It was reported that Menezes had not been properly identified by police officers because the police officer that was responsible for monitoring the door to the apartment block in which Menezes (and the suspected 21/7 bombers lived) was “relieving himself at the very moment that Menezes was leaving” the block of Flats. These claims were reinforced by another surveillance officer's witness statement that was given to the IPCC.[7]
Police Misinformation
Menezes Jumped Barrier
After the shooting of Menezes, reports were given that Menezes had increased suspicion of himself because he had jumped the ticket barrier and fled from police.
Sir Ian Blair told a press conference: "… as I understand the situation [Menezes] was challenged and refused to obey police instructions."[8] A Scotland Yard Spokesman stated that "police warned [Menezes], [but he ran] on to the station platform".[8] The Police stated that Menezes ran into Stockwell station when he was challenged and was shot after dashing on to an underground train.[9]
The Daily Mirror reported that Menezes "ran off, vaulting the ticket barrier and sprinting down an escalator on to a platform. Some witnesses said he was carrying a rucksack."[10] A senior security source said: "... This is a tragedy but it does not mean the police acted wrongly ... [they] repeated[ly] shouted ... to get him to stop [but] he dashed on to a tube."[10]
Sir Ian Blair stated that a warning was shouted at Menezes.[11] According to The Times, when [police] drew their weapons and shouted "Stop, armed police" ... [Menezes] looked over his shoulder and bolted". [12]
Evidence given to the IPCC inquiry by police officers and eyewitness, along with leaked documents given to ITV news proved that these initial accounts were baseless. CCTV footage showed Menezes calmly entering Stockwell tube station, collecting a free newspaper and boarding a tube train.[7] Contrary to all the claims that Menezes ran-away from police and that he vaulted the ticket barrier toward the train were all false claims.
Menezes Clothing
It was initially reported by Scotland Yard that "Menezes clothing and behaviour added to their suspicions".[8] It was alleged that Menezes was wearing a padded jacket on a warm day, which was for the purpose of concealing a bomb.
There was also the claim by Anthony Larkin, a passenger on the train where Menezes was shot, that Menezes was “wearing a bomb belt with wires coming out".[8]
An eyewitness told the press that Menezes was wearing "a baseball cap ... and quite a thickish coat. It was a coat like you would wear in winter, a sort of padded jacket. But it looked out of place in the weather we've been having."[13] According to other onlookers Menezes was "wearing a heavy winter coat in warm weather"[10]
It later emerged that accounts of him wearing a padded jacket and having a belt on with wires coming out were untrue. Menezes was in fact wearing light blue denim jeans and a light blue denim jacket.[14]
Resources
- Justice for Jean campaign website
- Letter from Sir Ian Blair to Home Office Permanent Secretary Sir John Gieve relating to the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes Metropolitan Police
Notes
- ↑ The Jean Charles de Menezes Family Campaign, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ Harriet Wistrich and Gareth Peirce, Press Statement 2: Response to the evidence made public during the last 24 hours as to the true circumstances of the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, 17 August 2005, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ Police defend shooting strategy, BBC News, 8 March 2006, accessed 07.09.10
- ↑ Gordon Rayner, ‘The shot Brazilian was here with a fake visa’, The Daily Mail, 29 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 06.09.10
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Commissioner's letter to The Home Office, Metropolitan Police Service, 30 September 2005, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ Rosa Prince, ‘Cover up? Letter reveals Met chief’s bid to block probe into tube shooting’, The Daily Mirror, 1 October 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 06.09.10
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Rosie Cowan, Duncan Campbell & Vikram Dodd, ‘New claims emerge over Menezes death’,The Guardian, 17 August 2005, accessed 06.09.10
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Man shot dead by police on Tube, BBC News, 22 July 2005, accessed 07.09.10
- ↑ Ian Cobain, Rosie Cowan and Richard Norton-Taylor, Faces of the suspects, The Guardian, 23 July 2005, accessed 07.09.10
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Alexandra Williams and Tom Pettifor, ‘War on Britain: Gun cops kill man on tube … but he had no bomb’, The Daily Mirror, 23 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10
- ↑ John Steele, ‘Elite squad enters unchartered territory’, The Daily Telegraph, 23 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10
- ↑ Adam Fresco, Rajeev Syal and Steve Bird, ‘Suspect shot dead ‘had no bomb’, The Times, 23 July 2005, accessed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10
- ↑ Eyewitness Accounts: The chase, the shooting and the sense of shock, The Guardian, 23 July 2005, aceesed via LexisNexis on 07.09.10
- ↑ Mark Honigsbau, ‘Brazilian did not wear bulky jacket’, The Guardian, 28 July 2005, accessed 06.09.10
