Christian Legal Centre

The Christian Legal Centre is an organisation which, according to its website, exists "To promote and protect the freedoms of Bible believing Christians in the United Kingdom; to promote religious freedom as a fundamental right by means of legal action and public promotion."

Cases

Emily Mapfuwa

In 2008, the Christian Legal Centre supported Emily Mapfuwa, a Christian who was offended by a sculpture of Christ with an erection, in a private prosecution against the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Arts for outraging public decency. In November that year, the case was taken over and discontinued by the Crown Prosecution Service, which concluded there was no case to answer.

Owen and Eunice Johns

In 2008, the Centre supported Eunice and Owen Johns, who were were turned down as foster parents by Derby City Council, after they said they could not tell children it was acceptable to be homosexual. While the Centre was preparing to seek a judicial review, the council offered to allow the couple to reapply.

Comment on Reproductive Ethics

In December 2008, the High Court rejected a legal challenge by the Centre and Comment On Reproductive Ethics, which sought to overturn a decision by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, to allow the creation of human-animal hybrid embryos. Mr Justice Dobbs ruled the application was "totally without merit."

Shirley Chaplin

In March 2010 the CFC supported nurse Shirley Chaplin in a case in an employment tribunal case against the Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust.

Chaplin received support in a letter to the Sunday Telegraph from Most Rev Lord Carey of Clifton, former Archbishop of Canterbury; Rt Rev Michael Scott-Joynt, Bishop of Winchester; Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, former Bishop of Rochester; Rt Rev Peter Forster, Bishop of Chester; Rt Rev Anthony Priddis, Bishop of Hereford; and the Rt Revd Nicholas Reade, Bishop of Blackburn.

In April 2010, the tribunal ruled that the NHS Trust had acted reasonably.

In a statement the Trust said it had been prepared to allow Chaplin "to wear a crucifix but not on a necklace or in any other manner which could constitute a health and safety risk whilst doing a clinical facing role in the hospital."

A number of unsubstantiated claims were made during the tribunal and we are satisfied that these have been shown to be completely without foundation. Sensible and sensitive solutions were offered to Mrs Chaplin. It is regrettable that her uncompromising stance and the involvement of parties external to the Trust determined to play out the case in the media, may have deflected her from agreeing one of these solutions.

The CLC's Andrea Williams said that: "Andrea Williams, Director of the Christian Legal Centre said: “The decision shows a worrying lack of common sense. No evidence supported the Trust’s ‘health and safety’ position, yet the Tribunal considered removing Mrs Chaplin’s Cross as a proportionate response to a ‘health and safety’ risk that was never established."

Gary McFarlane

In 2008, the CLC took up the case of Gary McFarlane, a counsellor who was sacked by Relate, because he refused to give advice on sexual problems to homosexual couples. At an employment tribunal hearing in December that year, counsel for Relate admitted that the organisation should have given him notice to leave instead of dismissing him on the grounds of gross misconduct. The tribunal upheld McFarlane's claim of wrongful dismissal, but ruled that he had not suffered religious discrimination.

In December 2009, McFarlane lost a hearing at the Employment Appeals Tribunal. The Church Times reported:

The tribunal drew comparisons to the case of Lilian Ladele (News, 9 January), a civic registrar in Islington, who had asked to be exempted from officiating at civil-partnership ceremonies. The tribunal said that it was justifiable for a body such as Relate “to require its employees to adhere to the same principles which it regards as fundamental to its own ethos”, particularly when the law requires this.

In a press release, the CLC interpreted the ruling to the effect that "‘Equal Opportunities’ means that Homosexual Rights Trump Christian Rights in Employment".

In April 2010, the CFC announced plans to challenge court rulings which its director Andrea Minichiello Williams said had "illuminated insensitivity to the interests and needs of the Christian community and represent disturbing judgments."

A CFC press release stated:

Lord Carey and others will this week support a formal application by The Christian Legal Centre acting for Gary McFarlane, a Christian relationship counsellor, that a specialist panel of five judges with a proven understanding of religious issues and headed by Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, should be established to hear his case and future cases involving religious rights.

The concluding section of Lord Carey's witness statement read:

This type of ‘reasoning’ is dangerous to the social order and represents clear animus to Christian beliefs. The fact that senior clerics of the Church of England and other faiths feel compelled to intervene directly in judicial decisions and cases is illuminative of a future civil unrest.

I am concerned that judges are unaware of these basic issues on the Christian faith; further it is difficult to see how it is appropriate for other religions to be considered by the Judiciary where the practices are further removed from our traditions.

It is for this reason I support the application by Mr. McFarlane for his appeal to be heard under the direction of the Lord Chief Justice and a freshly constituted five member Court of Appeal.

Further, I appeal to the Lord Chief Justice to establish a specialist Panel of Judges designated to hear cases engaging religious rights. Such Judges should have a proven sensitivity and understanding of religious issues and I would be supportive of Judges of all faiths and denominations being allocated to such a Panel. The Judges engaged in the cases listed above should recuse themselves from further adjudication on such matters as they have made clear their lack of knowledge about the Christian faith.

McFarlane's application to appeal was dismissed by Lord Justice Laws in a ruling which described Lord Carey's comments as misplaced, and added:

We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs.

The precepts of any one religion - any belief system - cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other.

If they did, those out in the cold would be less than citizens, and our constitution would be on the way to a theocracy, which is of necessity autocratic.

The law of a theocracy is dictated without option to the people, not made by their judges and governments.

The individual conscience is free to accept such dictated law, but the State, if its people are to be free, has the burdensome duty of thinking for itself.

In response to the judgement, Andrea Williams suggested that in effect, it sought "to rule out Christian principles of morality from the public square."

The former Bishop of Rochester Lord Nazir-Ali also criticised Lord Justice Laws ruling:

Everything from the Coronation Oath onwards suggests that there is an inextricable link between the Judaeo-Christian tradition of the Bible and the institutions, the values and the virtues of British society. If this judgment is allowed to stand, the aggressive secularists will have had their way.

People

• Andrea Minichiello Williams - Director
• David Clark - Director
• Rob Andrews - Company Secretary
• Libby Blaxall - Solicitor
• Onn Sein Kon - Case Manager
• Paul Coleman - Trainee Solicitor
• Paul Eddy - Public Relations Consultant