Difference between revisions of "Edward Luttwak"
(New page: Edward Nicolae Luttwak (born 1942, Romania) is a Senior Fellow in Preventive Diplomacy at The Center for Strategic and International Studies. Luttwak is an associate of [[Michael Lede...) |
(→Niger Uranium forgeries) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Niger Uranium forgeries== | ==Niger Uranium forgeries== | ||
| − | ::Many of these past associations emerged in a recent episode revealed during my meeting with Luttwak: that he was shown the infamous Niger forgeries by a friend with the Italian intelligence agency [[SISMI|Sismi]], when he was working as a consultant to a Sismi contractor named [[Luciano Monti]] in the 2001-2002 time frame, but that he refused to back-channel them to the Bush administration. (He never agrees to back-channel intelligence, Luttwak said, and these looked like forgeries to him.) The allegations in the forgeries, of course, became one of the Bush White House’s most controversial casus belli for the Iraq war — and, after proven phony even on the eve of the invasion, among the most embarrassing and politically damaging for the president and vice president, who cited the bogus uranium allegations despite warnings from the [[CIA]] not to.<ref>[http://www.forward.com/articles/13515/ The Operator: The Double Life of a Military Strategist], | + | According to Laura Rozen: |
| + | |||
| + | :Many of these past associations emerged in a recent episode revealed during my meeting with Luttwak: that he was shown the infamous Niger forgeries by a friend with the Italian intelligence agency [[SISMI|Sismi]], when he was working as a consultant to a Sismi contractor named [[Luciano Monti]] in the 2001-2002 time frame, but that he refused to back-channel them to the Bush administration. (He never agrees to back-channel intelligence, Luttwak said, and these looked like forgeries to him.) The allegations in the forgeries, of course, became one of the Bush White House’s most controversial casus belli for the Iraq war — and, after proven phony even on the eve of the invasion, among the most embarrassing and politically damaging for the president and vice president, who cited the bogus uranium allegations despite warnings from the [[CIA]] not to.<ref>Laura Rozen, [http://www.forward.com/articles/13515/ The Operator: The Double Life of a Military Strategist], ''Forward'', 5 June 2008.</ref> | ||
==Obama apostate smear== | ==Obama apostate smear== | ||
| − | In a May 2008 article, Luttwak claimed that Barack Obama was a Muslim under Muslim law: | + | In a May 2008 article, Luttwak claimed that [[Barack Obama]] was a Muslim under Muslim law: |
:Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him. | :Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him. | ||
| − | :His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=luttwak&st=cse&oref=slogin&oref=slogin President Apostate?], | + | :His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).<ref>Edward N. Luttwak, [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=luttwak&st=cse&oref=slogin&oref=slogin President Apostate?], ''New York Times'', 5 June 2008.</ref> |
==Hawkier than thou== | ==Hawkier than thou== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
*[[Center for Strategic and International Studies]] | *[[Center for Strategic and International Studies]] | ||
*[[ISI Enterprises]] | *[[ISI Enterprises]] | ||
| − | *[[Prospect | + | *[[Prospect]] - editorial board member |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Connections== | ==Connections== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 14 August 2014
Edward Nicolae Luttwak (born 1942, Romania) is a Senior Fellow in Preventive Diplomacy at The Center for Strategic and International Studies. Luttwak is an associate of Michael Ledeen and several other neocons. Luttwak is also known for his hawkish zionist stance.
Luttwak was born in Arad, Romania, and later attended the London School of Economics and Johns Hopkins University, where he received a doctorate. His first academic post was at the University of Bath. As of 2004, he is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.. He has served as a consultant to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Council, and the U.S. Department of State. He is a member of the National Security Study Group of the U.S. Department of Defense, and an associate of the Japan Finance Ministry's Institute of Fiscal and Monetary Policy.
Contents
Niger Uranium forgeries
According to Laura Rozen:
- Many of these past associations emerged in a recent episode revealed during my meeting with Luttwak: that he was shown the infamous Niger forgeries by a friend with the Italian intelligence agency Sismi, when he was working as a consultant to a Sismi contractor named Luciano Monti in the 2001-2002 time frame, but that he refused to back-channel them to the Bush administration. (He never agrees to back-channel intelligence, Luttwak said, and these looked like forgeries to him.) The allegations in the forgeries, of course, became one of the Bush White House’s most controversial casus belli for the Iraq war — and, after proven phony even on the eve of the invasion, among the most embarrassing and politically damaging for the president and vice president, who cited the bogus uranium allegations despite warnings from the CIA not to.[1]
Obama apostate smear
In a May 2008 article, Luttwak claimed that Barack Obama was a Muslim under Muslim law:
- Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him.
- His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).[2]
Hawkier than thou
There is a competition among cheerleaders for war to appear hawkier than their fellow Dr. Strangeloves. There are many such operators populating think-tanks in Washington, and the only way to stand out is to propose wars in terms that are media-friendly, or to appear far more hawkish than proposed government policy. On both counts such "operators" are useful for propaganda campaigns. First, they promote wars by making them more saleable. On this count Luttwak wrote "Give War a Chance" (picking on Lennon's slogan) [3]. And this refrain has been repeated often to justify other wars. Second, by appearing more hawkish than a government, these "intelligence experts" provide a service because they make government policy appear "moderate". Luttwak is one of these "super hawks".
Affiliations
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- ISI Enterprises
- Prospect - editorial board member
Connections
Contact, References and Resources
Contact
Resources
- List of Luttwak's articles
Related Articles
- Laura Rozen, The Operator: The Double Life of a Military Strategist, Forward, 5 June 2008
- Jim Lobe, Not the First Time Luttwak Gets His Factual Premises All Wrong, Lobelog.com, 1 June 2008
- Clark Hoyt, Entitled to Their Opinions, Yes. But Their Facts?, New York Times, 1 June 2008
References
- ↑ Laura Rozen, The Operator: The Double Life of a Military Strategist, Forward, 5 June 2008.
- ↑ Edward N. Luttwak, President Apostate?, New York Times, 5 June 2008.
- ↑ Edward N. Luttwak , Give War a Chance, Foreign Affairs, July/August 1999
