Difference between revisions of "European Mutual Help Network for individuals and families with Alcohol Related Problems"
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ENMA is a support and help network, members run meetings and offer support to those suffering from dependency on alcohol in 14 countries. In a copy of their 2006 newsletter the following criticisms of the EU Commission were made: | + | {{Template:alcohol badge}} |
− | + | '''ENMA''' is a small support and help network, members run meetings and offer support to those suffering from dependency on alcohol in 14 countries. In a copy of their 2006 newsletter the following criticisms of the EU Commission were made: | |
− | |||
===EU Commission rules self-defeating=== | ===EU Commission rules self-defeating=== | ||
− | At the start of 2005 EMNA hoped to be able to submit a proposal for a European | + | At the start of 2005 EMNA hoped to be able to submit a proposal for a European Project following a call for proposals related to initiatives to reduce social exclusion. In all respects, EMNA's members are well-positioned to make such a proposal except in one single respect: mutual-help has, almost by definition, very limited financial |
− | Project following a call for proposals related to initiatives to reduce social exclusion. | + | underpinning. Indeed, some of our groups have no money at all! The greatest part of our work is voluntary and our un-paid workforce is massive. EMNA’s members have hundreds of thousands of voluntary workers. The EU wanted grass-roots involvement but EMNA could not proceed with its proposal because the Commission insisted on a financial commitment of at least 40,000 euros in cash. The value of the work and experience we were prepared to invest in the project – our main resource – was ineligible as an “in kind” payment. Thus, by its own rules, the EU excluded the very sort of new players in Europe which its governments wish to involve.{{ref|1}} |
− | In all respects, | ||
− | in one single respect: mutual-help has, almost by definition, very limited financial | ||
− | underpinning. Indeed, some of our groups have no money at all! The greatest part of | ||
− | our work is voluntary and our un-paid workforce is massive. EMNA’s members have | ||
− | hundreds of thousands of voluntary workers. | ||
− | The EU wanted grass-roots involvement but EMNA could not proceed with its | ||
− | proposal because the Commission insisted on a financial commitment of at least | ||
− | 40,000 euros in cash. The value of the work and experience we were prepared to | ||
− | invest in the project – our main resource – was ineligible as an “in kind” payment. | ||
− | Thus, by its own rules, the EU excluded the very sort of new players in Europe | ||
− | which its governments wish to involve. | ||
− | {{ref|1}} | ||
− | |||
==Affiliations & Memberships== | ==Affiliations & Memberships== | ||
Line 25: | Line 11: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
#{{note|1}} EMNA Website [http://www.emna.org/news/2006_1.pdf. 2006 Newsletter] Last Accessed 3rd July 2007 | #{{note|1}} EMNA Website [http://www.emna.org/news/2006_1.pdf. 2006 Newsletter] Last Accessed 3rd July 2007 | ||
− | [[Category:Alcohol NGOs]] | + | [[Category:Alcohol NGOs]][[Category:Alcohol]][[Category:Alcohol Industry in the EU]] |
Latest revision as of 08:46, 14 May 2012
This article is part of the Spinwatch public health oriented Alcohol Portal project. |
ENMA is a small support and help network, members run meetings and offer support to those suffering from dependency on alcohol in 14 countries. In a copy of their 2006 newsletter the following criticisms of the EU Commission were made:
EU Commission rules self-defeating
At the start of 2005 EMNA hoped to be able to submit a proposal for a European Project following a call for proposals related to initiatives to reduce social exclusion. In all respects, EMNA's members are well-positioned to make such a proposal except in one single respect: mutual-help has, almost by definition, very limited financial underpinning. Indeed, some of our groups have no money at all! The greatest part of our work is voluntary and our un-paid workforce is massive. EMNA’s members have hundreds of thousands of voluntary workers. The EU wanted grass-roots involvement but EMNA could not proceed with its proposal because the Commission insisted on a financial commitment of at least 40,000 euros in cash. The value of the work and experience we were prepared to invest in the project – our main resource – was ineligible as an “in kind” payment. Thus, by its own rules, the EU excluded the very sort of new players in Europe which its governments wish to involve.[1]
Affiliations & Memberships
Notes
- ^ EMNA Website 2006 Newsletter Last Accessed 3rd July 2007