Difference between revisions of "Mobile Communications All-Party Parliamentary Group"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[Category:All Party Parliamentary Group]] | + | [[Category:All-Party Parliamentary Group]] |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 16 April 2010
One of the groups identified by the Times in 2006 which did not adequately disclose support from lobbying or PR firms, which 'list only the name of a lobbyist or public affairs consultant, and do not specify an ultimate client. This would appear to be a clear breach of parliamentary 1985 rules that state: “Where a public relations agency provides the assistance, the ultimate client should be named”[1]
Notes
- ↑ House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges, Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 1. Letter to the Commissioner from Mr Robert Thomson, 20 January 2006 Lobbying and All Party Groups Ninth Report of Session 2005–06
