Difference between revisions of "Talk:GlaxoSmithKline"
(problems with footnotes and references) |
(misconduct example) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Paul|Paulo]] | [[User:Paul|Paulo]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==example of misconduct== | ||
| + | to be added to main page when time allows... | ||
| + | GSK spokesman broke ABPI code by issuing misleading statements about Seroxat side effects http://www.pjonline.com/editorial/20021019/news/seroxat.html | ||
| + | --[[User:Lynn Hill|Lynn Hill]] 20:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:02, 31 December 2007
problems with footnotes and references
Unfortunately there is a serious problem with the references -- and will require a lot of work to fix. Links relationship between number in text and in the footnotes is obviously off. NB: the change in ff format from the old version to the new was done without error. It is simply the case that the orginal numbering didnt correspond. Furthermore, there is a problem with many dead links... it is not a case of simply looking up things. Then there is a problem of a new corporate domain name, and hence some of the ff have become obsolete -- even the text changed.
example of misconduct
to be added to main page when time allows... GSK spokesman broke ABPI code by issuing misleading statements about Seroxat side effects http://www.pjonline.com/editorial/20021019/news/seroxat.html --Lynn Hill 20:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
