Difference between revisions of "Associated British Nutrition"
Mary Spowart (talk | contribs) |
John Ashmore (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Template:Foodspin badge}} | ||
| − | [[Associated British Nutrition]] (ABN) is a subsidiary of [[Associated British Foods | + | [[Associated British Nutrition]] (ABN) is a subsidiary of [[Associated British Foods plc]] (ABF). It is the third largest animal feed manufacturer in the UK and one of the biggest users of genetically modified (GM) crops in the country. The company uses unsegregated (mixed GM and non-GM) soya and maize in many of its animal feed products. As well as manufacturing animal feed, ABN are involved in the management of various livestock schemes and the merchandising of agricultural products. |
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
== People == | == People == | ||
| + | * [[Alan Murphy]]- Company Director | ||
| + | * [[Peter Jackson]] | ||
| + | * [[David Langlands]] | ||
| + | * [[Alan Murphy]] | ||
| + | * Dr [[Helen Raine]] | ||
| + | Member of the United Kingdom Agricultural Supply Trade Association's National Executive Committee and is Chairman of its Feed Executive Committee.She is also a member of the new Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs which was set up by MAFF to examine the safety and use of animal feed. | ||
| + | * [[John Shirbon]] | ||
| + | * [[David Yiend]] | ||
| + | * Dr [[Michael Marsden]] Research and Technical Manager | ||
| + | Chair of the UKASTA scientific committee responsible for, among other things, lobbying government on environmental issues which effect its members. | ||
| + | == Company details == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Turnover £256.2m. Pre-Tax Profit £8.2m. (Year to September 1997) | ||
| + | * Number of Employees 896 (Sept 1997) | ||
== Subsidiaries == | == Subsidiaries == | ||
| Line 38: | Line 53: | ||
manufacturer in China. | manufacturer in China. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
ABN produces most of its animal feed through a subsidiary of the company called J. Bibby Agriculture. | ABN produces most of its animal feed through a subsidiary of the company called J. Bibby Agriculture. | ||
| − | + | J. Bibby has several livestock research projects around the country including: | |
| − | |||
| − | + | * [[Rowett Research Institute]] | |
| − | + | * [[Scottish Agricultural College]] (SAC) | |
| − | + | * [[Newcastle University]] | |
| − | + | * [[ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit]] | |
| − | + | * [[ADAS Dairy Research Centre]] | |
| − | + | * [[ABN Pig and Poultry Research Unit]] | |
| − | Rowett Research Institute | ||
| − | Scottish Agricultural College | ||
| − | Newcastle University | ||
| − | ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit | ||
| − | ADAS Dairy Research Centre | ||
| − | ABN Pig and Poultry Research Unit | ||
| − | + | == Affiliations == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ABN is a member of the [[United Kingdom Agricultural Supply Trade Association]] (UKASTA). Its representative there is Dr [[Helen Raine]], ABN Technical Director. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == ABN’s position on GM == | ||
| − | + | ABN does not have a position statement on the use of GM ingredients. However, according to Dr Michael Marsden, the majority of ABN's products do contain GM material. He says that there isn't currently sufficient demand for non-GM animal feed to warrant ABN producing more than niche quantities. This is done on an ad hoc basis when a customer demands it, though even then ABN will only supply it if it is economically viable. Like many others in the industry, he believes that it would be relatively easy to produce dairy and sheep feed without GM crop ingredients because soya and maize can be excluded. However, this still leaves the issue of GM micro ingredients unresolved, . | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ABN | ||
Dr Marsden claims that it would be difficult to produce pig and poultry feeds without using soya and as identity preserved (segregated non-GM) is currently much more expensive than unsegregated soya. Since the end product would be more expensive, this would be unpopular with farmers, he says. He goes on to state that it is also currently difficult to obtain large quantities of IP soya, though this may become easier in the future. | Dr Marsden claims that it would be difficult to produce pig and poultry feeds without using soya and as identity preserved (segregated non-GM) is currently much more expensive than unsegregated soya. Since the end product would be more expensive, this would be unpopular with farmers, he says. He goes on to state that it is also currently difficult to obtain large quantities of IP soya, though this may become easier in the future. | ||
| − | Companies in the US have recently announced that they are going to segregate maize because some varieties grown in the US have not been approved in Europe | + | Companies in the US have recently announced that they are going to segregate maize because some varieties grown in the US have not been approved in Europe {{ref|1}} and farmers are being urged to consider growing non-GM varieties by the American Corn Growers Association {{ref|2}}. With pressure from Europe, soya growers may follow suit. |
| − | Dr Marsden also stressed that there is a risk of cross-contamination throughout the supply chain and that there is a need for a legally defined threshold (acceptable level of GM contamination) | + | Dr Marsden also stressed that there is a risk of cross-contamination throughout the supply chain and that there is a need for a legally defined threshold (acceptable level of GM contamination). |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == J. Bibby and BSE == | |
| − | |||
| − | + | J. Bibby gave evidence to the BSE inquiry. The company admitted that it produced cattle feed containing meat and bone meal from other cattle. This is thought to be the mechanism by which BSE was transmitted through herds - and thence to humans. Dr Helen Raine and Dr Michael Marsden gave evidence on the company’s behalf.{{ref|3}} and {{ref|4}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Dr Michael Marsden | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | #{{note|1}}Financial Times 11 September 1999 p13. 'Cold comfort from crop segregation' | ||
| + | #{{note|2}}Los Angeles Times 5 October 1999 | ||
| + | #{{note|3}}www.bse.org.uk/witness/htm/stat154.htm. The BSE Inquiry Statement No 154. | ||
| + | #{{note|4}} http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/ws/s025.pdf | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | [[Category: Food and Agriculture Industry]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 8 September 2009
Associated British Nutrition (ABN) is a subsidiary of Associated British Foods plc (ABF). It is the third largest animal feed manufacturer in the UK and one of the biggest users of genetically modified (GM) crops in the country. The company uses unsegregated (mixed GM and non-GM) soya and maize in many of its animal feed products. As well as manufacturing animal feed, ABN are involved in the management of various livestock schemes and the merchandising of agricultural products.
Contents
Contact Details
- Address: ABN House, Oundle Road, Woodston, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE2 9QS
- Tel 01733 555552
People
- Alan Murphy- Company Director
- Peter Jackson
- David Langlands
- Alan Murphy
- Dr Helen Raine
Member of the United Kingdom Agricultural Supply Trade Association's National Executive Committee and is Chairman of its Feed Executive Committee.She is also a member of the new Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs which was set up by MAFF to examine the safety and use of animal feed.
- John Shirbon
- David Yiend
- Dr Michael Marsden Research and Technical Manager
Chair of the UKASTA scientific committee responsible for, among other things, lobbying government on environmental issues which effect its members.
Company details
- Turnover £256.2m. Pre-Tax Profit £8.2m. (Year to September 1997)
- Number of Employees 896 (Sept 1997)
Subsidiaries
By far the largest of ABN's animal feeds businesses.
Specialises in Molassed Sugar Beet Feed and feed made from the by-products of distillers (spirits manufacturers).
A large feed manufacturer in Northern Ireland.
This company analyses the feed of ABN's feed businesses. They receive end products and raw materials which they analyse for nutritional content and 'undesirables' such as pesticide residue.
- Farming Supplies (Maldon)
The company only produces feed for sheep and cattle. It doesn't use any antibiotics or growth promoters in its products. The company is in the process of converting to organic.
Involved in alternative feeding systems, selling a range of feeds.
Manufacturer of horse, pet and speciality feeds.
- ABN Huinong Feed Company This is the fifth largest animal feed
manufacturer in China.
ABN produces most of its animal feed through a subsidiary of the company called J. Bibby Agriculture.
J. Bibby has several livestock research projects around the country including:
- Rowett Research Institute
- Scottish Agricultural College (SAC)
- Newcastle University
- ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit
- ADAS Dairy Research Centre
- ABN Pig and Poultry Research Unit
Affiliations
ABN is a member of the United Kingdom Agricultural Supply Trade Association (UKASTA). Its representative there is Dr Helen Raine, ABN Technical Director.
ABN’s position on GM
ABN does not have a position statement on the use of GM ingredients. However, according to Dr Michael Marsden, the majority of ABN's products do contain GM material. He says that there isn't currently sufficient demand for non-GM animal feed to warrant ABN producing more than niche quantities. This is done on an ad hoc basis when a customer demands it, though even then ABN will only supply it if it is economically viable. Like many others in the industry, he believes that it would be relatively easy to produce dairy and sheep feed without GM crop ingredients because soya and maize can be excluded. However, this still leaves the issue of GM micro ingredients unresolved, .
Dr Marsden claims that it would be difficult to produce pig and poultry feeds without using soya and as identity preserved (segregated non-GM) is currently much more expensive than unsegregated soya. Since the end product would be more expensive, this would be unpopular with farmers, he says. He goes on to state that it is also currently difficult to obtain large quantities of IP soya, though this may become easier in the future.
Companies in the US have recently announced that they are going to segregate maize because some varieties grown in the US have not been approved in Europe [1] and farmers are being urged to consider growing non-GM varieties by the American Corn Growers Association [2]. With pressure from Europe, soya growers may follow suit.
Dr Marsden also stressed that there is a risk of cross-contamination throughout the supply chain and that there is a need for a legally defined threshold (acceptable level of GM contamination).
J. Bibby and BSE
J. Bibby gave evidence to the BSE inquiry. The company admitted that it produced cattle feed containing meat and bone meal from other cattle. This is thought to be the mechanism by which BSE was transmitted through herds - and thence to humans. Dr Helen Raine and Dr Michael Marsden gave evidence on the company’s behalf.[3] and [4]
References
- ^Financial Times 11 September 1999 p13. 'Cold comfort from crop segregation'
- ^Los Angeles Times 5 October 1999
- ^www.bse.org.uk/witness/htm/stat154.htm. The BSE Inquiry Statement No 154.
- ^ http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/ws/s025.pdf
