Difference between revisions of "American Soybean Association"
John Ashmore (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Template:Foodspin badge}} | ||
| + | |||
[http://www.soygrowers.com/ American Soybean Association] (ASA) claims to be 'a non-profit, farmer-controlled organisation working to strengthen soybeans as a viable crop' but it enjoys a remarkably close relationship with Monsanto and other biotech corporations. | [http://www.soygrowers.com/ American Soybean Association] (ASA) claims to be 'a non-profit, farmer-controlled organisation working to strengthen soybeans as a viable crop' but it enjoys a remarkably close relationship with Monsanto and other biotech corporations. | ||
| + | In fiscal year 2000 it received $2.1 million of its $26.7 million budget from [[Monsanto]], [[Pioneer Hi-Bred International]], [[BASF]], Stein Seed Co. and others, says controller [[Brian Vaught]].<ref>Robert Schubert, [http://www.cropchoice.com/leadstry260b.html?recid=587 Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups], CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009</ref> | ||
| − | + | In 2001, the Association spent $280,000 to work with the [[Council for Biotechnology Information]] and the [[National Corn Growers Association]] to achieve "a unified message about the benefits of transgenic crops."<ref>Robert Schubert, [http://www.cropchoice.com/leadstry260b.html?recid=587 Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups], CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | In 2001, the Association spent $280,000 to work with the Council for Biotechnology Information and the National Corn Growers to achieve "a unified message about the benefits of transgenic crops." | ||
| − | |||
| − | That message has been brought to Europe where ASA Technical Director | + | That message has been brought to Europe, where, ASA Technical Director [[Kimball Nill]] warns, 'Various pressure groups and some media are hoodwinking the public by making unsubstantiated assertions about US farmers adoption of biotechnology. Their random statements are ludicrous, untrue and deliberately misleading'.<ref>[http://nanoscienceworks.org/people/nill-kimball/?searchterm=Funding Kimball Nill], NanoScienceWorks.org website, accessed 20 April 2009</ref> |
| + | Some US farmers feel ASA and similar groups 'are helping agribusiness to enhance its power and profitability at the expense of the very people they're supposed to represent - farmers.'<ref>Robert Schubert, [http://www.cropchoice.com/leadstry260b.html?recid=587 Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups], CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009</ref> | ||
| − | + | ===Notes=== | |
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | [[Category:Food Industry lobby groups]][[Category:Biotechnology]][[Category:GM]][[Category:GM Farm Lobby]][[Category:GM Lobby Groups]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:51, 4 September 2009
American Soybean Association (ASA) claims to be 'a non-profit, farmer-controlled organisation working to strengthen soybeans as a viable crop' but it enjoys a remarkably close relationship with Monsanto and other biotech corporations.
In fiscal year 2000 it received $2.1 million of its $26.7 million budget from Monsanto, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, BASF, Stein Seed Co. and others, says controller Brian Vaught.[1]
In 2001, the Association spent $280,000 to work with the Council for Biotechnology Information and the National Corn Growers Association to achieve "a unified message about the benefits of transgenic crops."[2]
That message has been brought to Europe, where, ASA Technical Director Kimball Nill warns, 'Various pressure groups and some media are hoodwinking the public by making unsubstantiated assertions about US farmers adoption of biotechnology. Their random statements are ludicrous, untrue and deliberately misleading'.[3]
Some US farmers feel ASA and similar groups 'are helping agribusiness to enhance its power and profitability at the expense of the very people they're supposed to represent - farmers.'[4]
Notes
- ↑ Robert Schubert, Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups, CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009
- ↑ Robert Schubert, Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups, CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009
- ↑ Kimball Nill, NanoScienceWorks.org website, accessed 20 April 2009
- ↑ Robert Schubert, Some claim that corporate cash compromises role of farm groups, CropChoice, 13 Feb 2002, accessed April 20 2009
