Difference between revisions of "British Geological Survey"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Shale Gas: Heriot Watt findings questions BGS estimates)
(→‎Publications)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
{{‪Template:Fracking badge‬}}
 
{{‪Template:Fracking badge‬}}
 
*Press release, 'Shale gas resource figure released', 27 June 2013
 
*Press release, 'Shale gas resource figure released', 27 June 2013
−
* Published a report on the induced seismic activity of shale gas in November 2016.
 
−
Their full summary of it:
 
−
:'The aims of this project were to better understand the levels of induced seismic activity that could be associated with unconventional oil and gas activities in Scotland and better understand the robust regulatory and non-regulatory actions that can be taken to mitigate any noticeable effects on communities. The research has found that Scotland is characterised by low levels of earthquake activity and the risk of damaging earthquake is low. On average there are eight earthquakes of magnitude 2 or above in Scotland every year, which is approximately the magnitude above which earthquakes might be felt by people. Hydraulic fracturing to recover hydrocarbons is generally accompanied by earthquakes with magnitudes of less than 2 that are too small to be felt. Evidence from the United States and Western Canada suggests that the probability of induced earthquakes that can be felt is small, although there are a number of examples of earthquakes that were large enough to be felt. Improved understanding of the hazard from induced earthquakes and the successful implementation of regulatory measures to mitigate the risk of induced seismicity are likely to require additional data from a number of sources, including improved monitoring capabilities.' <ref> [http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/news.nsf/articles/Unconventional+oil+and+gas+research+published+09112016132500?open Unconventional oil and gas research published], ''Wired Gov'', 09 November 2016. Accessed 15 December 2016. </ref>
 
−
 
−
However, a fracking literature review published by [[Andrew Watterson]] and [[William Dinan]] concluded that:
 
−
:'Although several reports and papers, including some from the UK government and its agencies, state fracking would be safe assuming there is or will be industry best practice and ‘robust’ regulation, the evidence base for such statements is remarkably sparse [...].
 
−
:There are multiple serious challenges surrounding location, scale, monitoring and data deficits facing regulators overseeing onshore UGE and fracking in the UK;
 
−
:The evidence from peer-reviewed papers suggests fracking in the UK will not be effectively regulated. It is highly likely that regulatory agencies may lack the staffing and resources necessary to monitor and enforce effective regulation of the industry;
 
−
:US and UK peer-reviewed analyses and EU law identify both the precautionary principle and prevention as keys to dealing with fracking. This is underpinned by findings from the peer-reviewed public health literature that already identifies significant hazards and major potential risks from the industry.'<ref>Andrew Watterson and William Dinan, [http://www.regulatingscotland.org/report/frackingandregulation.pdf A RAPID EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT OF REGULATION AND REGULATORY PRACTICES INVOLVED IN FRACKING AND ITS PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS], ''Regulating Scotland'', accessed 16 December 2016. </ref>
 
  
 
==Contact==
 
==Contact==

Revision as of 01:56, 22 August 2017

The British Geological Survey (BGS) describes itself as 'the nation's principal supplier of objective, impartial and up-to-date geological expertise and information for decision making for governmental, commercial and individual users'.

It is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and is government-funded.

Shale Gas reserve estimates by BGS

FrackWell.png This article is part of the Spinwatch Fracking Portal and project

BGS has estimated that 1,300tn cubic feet of gas exists beneath the north-west of England, Yorkshire and East Midlands.

These estimates have since been called into question by a team of scientists at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, led by Professor John Underhill, who warned that the UK's shale gas potential was 'over-hyped' and 'unlikely' to be economically viable. '

Professor Underhill said the UK’s gas-bearing sedimentary basins were tilted and buckled by tectonic movements, making them less suitable for fracking than successful US shale areas.

There is a need to factor this considerable and fundamental geological uncertainty into the economic equation,” he said. “It would be extremely unwise to rely on shale gas to ride to the rescue of the UK’s gas needs.” [1]

Affiliations

People

Press

Funding

Research grants include funding from Centrica, Cuadrilla., GDF Suez, Total.

Publications

FrackWell.png This article is part of the Spinwatch Fracking Portal and project
  • Press release, 'Shale gas resource figure released', 27 June 2013

Contact

:Headquarters:

British Geological Survey
Environmental Science Centre
Nicker Hill
Keyworth
Nottingham NG12 5GG


:London Office:

Natural History Museum
Cromwell Road
London SW7 5BD
Phone:+44 (0)20 7589 4090
Website:http://www.bgs.ac.uk/contacts/sites/home.html

Resources

Notes

  1. ↑ Andrew Ward, Drilling begins on first UK shale well for six years, FT, 18 August 2017, accessed 22 August 2017
Retrieved from "https://powerbase.info/index.php?title=British_Geological_Survey&oldid=247096"