Difference between revisions of "User talk:Paul"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php?title=Talk:Nohad_el-Machnouk&rcid=19552
 
not sure what you mean here?
 
--[[User:David|David]] 08:14, 7 Dec 2006 (GMT)
 
  
Unless there is something in the biography that is particularly revealing, reproducing extended biographies defeats the whole purpose of having a profile. The idea should be to provide condensed factual information that highlights possible conflicts of interests. The bios on Lappen & Vallely are in my view mostly superfluous. Secondly, on the Palast profile, I think you can summarize the nature of his attack on Gallowy without editorializing on Galloways stance on the war --[[User:Idrees|Idrees]] 14:22, 10 Dec 2006 (GMT)
 
  
 
Hi Paul,
 
Hi Paul,
Line 10: Line 6:
  
 
--[[User:David|David]] 10:05, 31 Jan 2007 (GMT)
 
--[[User:David|David]] 10:05, 31 Jan 2007 (GMT)
 +
 +
Paul,
 +
 +
more on the communicating Terror conference here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Bill_Durodi%C3%A9
 +
Note that Norman Solomon was invited and spoke very forcefully against the LM line accusing them more or less of being provacateurs when they criticised the anti war movement - comparing them to similar elements int he anti vietnam war movement.  I was at the conference and can brief you more about this.  Norman's role there was wholly positive in my view...
 +
--[[User:David|David]] 13:03, 4 Feb 2007 (GMT)

Revision as of 13:03, 4 February 2007


Hi Paul,

I think we could do with changing the useful fools category. Idrees has a category on journalists. Maybe you could agree between you what to call this?

--David 10:05, 31 Jan 2007 (GMT)

Paul,

more on the communicating Terror conference here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Bill_Durodi%C3%A9 Note that Norman Solomon was invited and spoke very forcefully against the LM line accusing them more or less of being provacateurs when they criticised the anti war movement - comparing them to similar elements int he anti vietnam war movement. I was at the conference and can brief you more about this. Norman's role there was wholly positive in my view... --David 13:03, 4 Feb 2007 (GMT)