Difference between revisions of "User talk:Claire Harkins"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 15:19, 3 June 2008 (BST) | --[[User:David|David]] 15:19, 3 June 2008 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | On diageo: sounds fine to me. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 19:30, 3 June 2008 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 3 June 2008
Have a look at the resources section of the page on CoRWM: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/CoRWM or http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Bell_Pottinger_Communications#References
The key thing is to reference docuemtns fully (ie author, title, source, vdate etc) and to upload the documents to the site via the 'upload image' link under 'special pages'. To determine the url for the uploaded file right click on the name of it once uploaded and 'copy link location'.
FOI ref author, title for this doc dates etc et
Hi,
great stuff on Baird. Where DID you get the photo? He looks scary...
We probably need to say that the student is you in the text and you could note that this was for a Masters dissertation.
Can you also include the precise references for the relevant emails? eg who from and to, date, title etc. --David 23:36, 24 April 2008 (BST)
Hi,
Good stuff on Diageo. I think it may be time to rationalise all the Diageo pages soe that all the stuff on influence and affiliations is together rather than split between the main page and http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Diageo:_Influence
What do you think? How should it all be organised? There are about 4 pages at the minute. Is this organisation sensible?
--David 15:19, 3 June 2008 (BST)
On diageo: sounds fine to me.
--David 19:30, 3 June 2008 (BST)
