Difference between revisions of "Tom Vilsack"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The Legislative Fiscal Bureau analysts are not alone in their take on the ability of biotech to save regional economies. While tax breaks and government grants are offered to attract biotech firms to set up in regions, returns have often been disappointing and there has been a rash of bankruptcies in the biotech sector as firms fail to produce and market the miracle products they promise. According to an Associated Press report, "for all its promise, the biotechnology industry has lost a combined $40 billion since its inception in 1976"<ref>Paul Elias, "[http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-06-10-wooing-biotech_x.htm States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?]", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.</ref>: | The Legislative Fiscal Bureau analysts are not alone in their take on the ability of biotech to save regional economies. While tax breaks and government grants are offered to attract biotech firms to set up in regions, returns have often been disappointing and there has been a rash of bankruptcies in the biotech sector as firms fail to produce and market the miracle products they promise. According to an Associated Press report, "for all its promise, the biotechnology industry has lost a combined $40 billion since its inception in 1976"<ref>Paul Elias, "[http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-06-10-wooing-biotech_x.htm States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?]", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.</ref>: | ||
| − | :"This notion that you lure biotech to your community to save its economy is laughable," said Joseph Cortright, a Portland, Oregon economist who co-wrote a report on the subject. "This is a bad-idea virus that has swept through governors, mayors and economic development officials."<ref>Paul Elias, "[http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-06-10-wooing-biotech_x.htm States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?]", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.</ref> | + | :"This notion that you lure biotech to your community to save its economy is laughable," said Joseph Cortright, a Portland, Oregon economist who co-wrote a report<ref>Joseph Cortright and Heike Meyer, "[http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2002/06_biotechnology_cortright.aspx Signs of Life: The Growth of Biotechnology Centers in the US]", The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 2002, accessed February 2009.</ref> on the subject. "This is a bad-idea virus that has swept through governors, mayors and economic development officials."<ref>Paul Elias, "[http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-06-10-wooing-biotech_x.htm States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?]", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.</ref> |
Vilsack was a prime mover of the seed pre-emption bill in 2005, which prevents state governments from instituting local bans and restrictions on genetically modified (GM) seeds and crops. Many people in Iowa fought this bill. Representative Sandy Greiner, the Republican sponsor of the bill, bragged on the House Floor that Vilsack put her up to it right after his state of the state address. | Vilsack was a prime mover of the seed pre-emption bill in 2005, which prevents state governments from instituting local bans and restrictions on genetically modified (GM) seeds and crops. Many people in Iowa fought this bill. Representative Sandy Greiner, the Republican sponsor of the bill, bragged on the House Floor that Vilsack put her up to it right after his state of the state address. | ||
Revision as of 15:13, 1 February 2009
Former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack was appointed US secretary of agriculture by President Barack Obama in 2009.
Contents
Pharma crop supporter
Vilsack has come under fire for his support for genetically engineered (GM) pharmaceutical crops, especially pharmaceutical corn:
- Gov. Tom Vilsack said a decision by a biotechnical industry group not to grow genetically engineered corn for pharmaceutical purposes in states such as Iowa is "a dangerous precedent."
- "I feel this decision by for a pharma-crop ban is a knee-jerk reaction that is not fully warranted by the scientific evidence," Vilsack wrote in a letter to the Biotechnology Industry Organization.
- The group said this week that its members had agreed not to grow pharmaceutical crops in states where it could contaminate neighboring crops intended for human consumption. That includes Iowa, and Vilsack reacted quickly, dashing off a letter asking the group for a clarification of its policy... Vilsack has said the state could have a bright future in developing genetically engineered crops for the pharmaceutical industry.[1]
Industry accolade
In 2001 the biggest biotechnology industry group, the Biotechnology Industry Organization, named Vilsack Governor of the Year. He was also the founder and former chair of the Governor's Biotechnology Partnership.[2]
Vilsack falls victim to "bad idea virus"
When Vilsack created the Iowa Values Fund, his first poster child of economic development potential was biotech company Trans Ova and its pursuit of cloning dairy cows. Vilsack proclaimed, "Iowa begins today an effort to break the genetic code of economic development."[3]
Not everyone shared Vilsack's faith that Trans Ova would regenerate Iowa's economy. According to information gathered by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau but never made public, Trans Ova was one of "two big business projects given incentives through the Iowa Values Fund [that] actually will cost the state money in the long run, despite the increased economic activity they bring."
The data, a copy of which was obtained by the Associated Press, says incentives and services offered to Trans Ova Genetics "eventually will cost the state more than it will receive in tax revenues."[4]
The Legislative Fiscal Bureau analysts are not alone in their take on the ability of biotech to save regional economies. While tax breaks and government grants are offered to attract biotech firms to set up in regions, returns have often been disappointing and there has been a rash of bankruptcies in the biotech sector as firms fail to produce and market the miracle products they promise. According to an Associated Press report, "for all its promise, the biotechnology industry has lost a combined $40 billion since its inception in 1976"[5]:
- "This notion that you lure biotech to your community to save its economy is laughable," said Joseph Cortright, a Portland, Oregon economist who co-wrote a report[6] on the subject. "This is a bad-idea virus that has swept through governors, mayors and economic development officials."[7]
Vilsack was a prime mover of the seed pre-emption bill in 2005, which prevents state governments from instituting local bans and restrictions on genetically modified (GM) seeds and crops. Many people in Iowa fought this bill. Representative Sandy Greiner, the Republican sponsor of the bill, bragged on the House Floor that Vilsack put her up to it right after his state of the state address.
Vilsack has a glowing reputation as being a schill for agribusiness biotech giants like Monsanto. Sustainable ag advocated across the country were spreading the word of Vilsack's history as he was attempting to appeal to voters in his presidential bid. An activist from the west coast even made this youtube animation about Vilsack http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmoc4Qgcm4s The airplane in this animation is a referral to the controversy that Vilsack often traveled in Monsanto's jet.
Vilsack is an ardent support of corn and soy based biofuels, which use as much or more fossil energy to produce them as they generate, while driving up world food prices and literally starving the poor.
Vilsack's response to his critics: "What About the OCA?", Support Tom Vilsack for Secretary of Agriculture website, accessed January 2009.</ref>
To learn more about this vitally important issue:
Tom Vilsack's Kind of Agriculture: Another Shill for Monsanto: http://www.counterpunch.org/cummins12182008.html
You Said NO to Vilsack: http://www.organicconsumers.org/vilsack.cfm
Obama Picks Pro-Ethanol, Agribusiness Ex-Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack to Head Agricultural Dept. http://www.democracynow.org/2008/12/18/obama_picks_pro_ethanol_former_iowa
_______________________
Contact
- Address:
- Phone:
- Email:
- Website:
Resources
Notes
- ↑ Mike Glover, "Vilsack, Gross weigh in on biotech decision", Associated Press, 24 October 2002, accessed January 2009.
- ↑ "Iowa’s Vilsack Named BIO Governor of the Year", press release, Biotechnology Industry Organization, 20 September 2001, accessed January 2009.
- ↑ Kathie Obradovich, "Sioux Center, Iowa, Biotech Company to Receive $9 Million for Expansion", Waterloo Courier (Waterloo, Iowa), via Knight-Ridder/TribuneBusiness News 28 August 2003, accessed February 2009.
- ↑ "Iowa Values Fund: Drain, not gain, forecast for big incentive awards", Des Moines Register via Associated Press, 28 January 2005, accessed February 2009.
- ↑ Paul Elias, "States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.
- ↑ Joseph Cortright and Heike Meyer, "Signs of Life: The Growth of Biotechnology Centers in the US", The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 2002, accessed February 2009.
- ↑ Paul Elias, "States, cities court biotech, but is it worth it?", USA Today via Associated Press, 6 October 2004, accessed February 2009.
