Difference between revisions of "Nirex"
(→Background) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 12: | ||
The Following PR Companies have provided PR advice to Nirex since 2003: | The Following PR Companies have provided PR advice to Nirex since 2003: | ||
| − | [[Promise PR]] - To provide Professional Consultancy regarding a posssible change in company name - £45,000 | + | *[[Promise PR]] - To provide Professional Consultancy regarding a posssible change in company name - £45,000 |
| − | + | *[[Kingsmead Communications Limited]] - To provide professional consultancy and support in the area of media relations and corporate communications - £25,000 | |
| − | [[Kingsmead Communications Limited]] - To provide professional consultancy and support in the area of media relations and corporate communications - £25,000 | + | *[[Fleishman Hillard]] - (formerly GPC) - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the Scottish Parliament - £129,900 |
| − | + | *[[Fleishman Hillard]] - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the European Parliament - £53,200 | |
| − | [[Fleishman Hillard]] - (formerly GPC) - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the Scottish Parliament - £129,900 | + | *[[Connect]] - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to Westminster and the National Assembly for Wales - £72,200 |
| − | + | *[[Bell Pottinger]] - To provide commmunications advice related to the Nirex pension fund - £24,000 | |
| − | [[Fleishman Hillard]] - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the European Parliament - £53,200 | + | *[[International Futures Forum]] - [[Praxis Limited]] - To provide Corporate Communications advice in relation to the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely (MRWS) consultation programme - £32,000 |
| − | + | *[[ForthRoad Limited]] - To help facilitate external events - £29,000 | |
| − | [[Connect]] - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to Westminster and the National Assembly for Wales - £72,200 | + | *[[Facilitating Change Limited]] - To help facilitate external events - £14,800 |
| − | + | *[[The Future Foundation]] - To help facilitate external evetns and to help draft corporate communications materials - £31,500 | |
| − | [[Bell Pottinger]] - To provide commmunications advice related to the Nirex pension fund - £24,000 | + | *[[ERM]] - To undertake an asssement of stakeholder views of Nirex - £32,600 |
| − | + | *[[MORI]] - To undertake a public opinion survey - £30,000 - due to be repeated in 2005/06 | |
| − | [[International Futures Forum]] - [[Praxis Limited]] - To provide Corporate Communications advice in relation to the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely (MRWS) consultation programme - £32,000 | + | *[[Women's Insitute]] - To participate in a workshop to discuss radioactive waste management - £5,000 |
| − | |||
| − | [[ForthRoad Limited]] - To help facilitate external events - £29,000 | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[Facilitating Change Limited]] - To help facilitate external events - £14,800 | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[The Future Foundation]] - To help facilitate external evetns and to help draft corporate communications materials - £31,500 | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[ERM]] - To undertake an asssement of stakeholder views of Nirex - £32,600 | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[MORI]] - To undertake a public opinion survey - £30,000 - due to be repeated in 2005/06 | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[Women's Insitute]] - To participate in a workshop to discuss radioactive waste management - £5,000 | ||
[Ref: D. Wild (2005) Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK, 15 July] | [Ref: D. Wild (2005) Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK, 15 July] | ||
In addition, [[Good Relations]] list Nirex as a client on its website as well [http://www.goodrelations.co.uk/clients.asp?id=71]. According to Good Relations, "it has advised Nirex, the UK’s nuclear waste agency, during the last five years as it moved to become an independent body. This has been a highly sensitive project requiring a co-ordinated media, stakeholder and political communications strategy. It has involved working closely with a number of Government departments including the [[MoD]] (in particular on the ISOLUS nuclear submarine project); [[DTI]], [[Defra]] and [[No10]]. | In addition, [[Good Relations]] list Nirex as a client on its website as well [http://www.goodrelations.co.uk/clients.asp?id=71]. According to Good Relations, "it has advised Nirex, the UK’s nuclear waste agency, during the last five years as it moved to become an independent body. This has been a highly sensitive project requiring a co-ordinated media, stakeholder and political communications strategy. It has involved working closely with a number of Government departments including the [[MoD]] (in particular on the ISOLUS nuclear submarine project); [[DTI]], [[Defra]] and [[No10]]. | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 29 January 2006
Background
Nirex is a government-controlled agency established in 1980 to oversee the storage of radioactive waste. It is charged with finding a long-term repository for the waste which will remain deadly for millions of years.
Sexing up Nukes
Nirex have been accused of "sexing up" a report on nuclear dumping, according to the Guardian, [1]. The paper had obtained a leaked copy of an Environment Agency document sent to Ministers that concluded "Nirex present an overly optimistic view," of dumping. Nirex presented arguments in which the agency says: "The positive arguments are given prominence and corresponding negative arguments are not examined." According to the Guardian "Chief among the concerns is that the proposed concrete and steel containers used to bury waste could leak within 500 years. Despite that, the agency says the report has not identified any 'major' issues that would scupper such an underground store and declares the concept 'viable'.
Nuclear Spinners Working for Nirex
The Following PR Companies have provided PR advice to Nirex since 2003:
- Promise PR - To provide Professional Consultancy regarding a posssible change in company name - £45,000
- Kingsmead Communications Limited - To provide professional consultancy and support in the area of media relations and corporate communications - £25,000
- Fleishman Hillard - (formerly GPC) - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the Scottish Parliament - £129,900
- Fleishman Hillard - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to the European Parliament - £53,200
- Connect - To provide corporate communications advice in relation to Westminster and the National Assembly for Wales - £72,200
- Bell Pottinger - To provide commmunications advice related to the Nirex pension fund - £24,000
- International Futures Forum - Praxis Limited - To provide Corporate Communications advice in relation to the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely (MRWS) consultation programme - £32,000
- ForthRoad Limited - To help facilitate external events - £29,000
- Facilitating Change Limited - To help facilitate external events - £14,800
- The Future Foundation - To help facilitate external evetns and to help draft corporate communications materials - £31,500
- ERM - To undertake an asssement of stakeholder views of Nirex - £32,600
- MORI - To undertake a public opinion survey - £30,000 - due to be repeated in 2005/06
- Women's Insitute - To participate in a workshop to discuss radioactive waste management - £5,000
[Ref: D. Wild (2005) Freedom of Information Request, Letter to Jean McSorley, Senior Advisor to Greenpeace UK, 15 July]
In addition, Good Relations list Nirex as a client on its website as well [2]. According to Good Relations, "it has advised Nirex, the UK’s nuclear waste agency, during the last five years as it moved to become an independent body. This has been a highly sensitive project requiring a co-ordinated media, stakeholder and political communications strategy. It has involved working closely with a number of Government departments including the MoD (in particular on the ISOLUS nuclear submarine project); DTI, Defra and No10.
