|
|
| (13 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | ==GlaxoSmithKline== | | ==GlaxoSmithKline== |
| | | | |
| − | [[The Confederation of British Industry]] ([[CBI]])''
| + | ===Animal Testing=== |
| − | | |
| − | [[GSK]] is on The Environmental Affairs Committee, which is an unrepresentative committee and is dominated by major polluting industries e.g [[Glaxo Smith Kilne]], [[Onyz]], [[Rolls-Royce]], [[British Airways]],[[ Vauxhall Motors]],[[BMW]], [[Exxon-Mobile]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[CBI]] claims to represent a broad section of UK business, but there are trends of clear alignment with [[CBI]] and members of the government regarding support and encouragemnet of neo-liberal economic policies e.g. regulation.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Rather than a burden, regulation can drive innovations that benefit environment, health and society as well as the economy
| |
| − | i.e. [[The World Economic Forum]] Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005 over 100 countries showed Finland, Sweden and Norway with traditionally high environmental protection and taxation feature in the top 10 most competitive countries
| |
| − | <ref> [http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/hidden_voices.pdf CBI, Corporate Lobbying and Sustainability Report 2005] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ''Animal Testing''
| |
| | | | |
| | It is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies and has a direct influence on [[UK Government]] policy, including animal experimentation policy, for which it has lobbied for a relaxation of regulations.<ref> [http://www.uncaged.co.uk/iams01.htm Animal Testing] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> | | It is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies and has a direct influence on [[UK Government]] policy, including animal experimentation policy, for which it has lobbied for a relaxation of regulations.<ref> [http://www.uncaged.co.uk/iams01.htm Animal Testing] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> |
| Line 25: |
Line 13: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | ''Failing Global Health Needs''
| + | ===Products=== |
| − | | |
| − | 14 Million people die each year from infectious diseases, most of them in developing countries. The medical treatments available are often archaic and ineffective, especially for so-called ‘neglected diseases’ (Malaria, Tuberculosis, Sleeping Sickness, Chagas disease, and leishmaniasis), whose victims are almost exclusively from developing countries and poor. '''These diseases are linked with poverty and unsanitary living conditions'''; new drugs are desperately needed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | At present, '''private pharmaceutical companies control the development of new medicines'''. People in Developing countries, who make up 80 per cent of the world’s population, only represent about 20 per cent of worldwide medicine sales. Since these people are relatively poor, [[GlaxoSmithKline]], along with other major pharmaceutical companies, do '''not see it as profitable to develop medicines for their needs''', and do negligible research into medicines which would help them. “Of all annual health related research, only 0.2 per cent is spent on pneumonia, diarrhoea, and tuberculosis-three poverty related ailments which account for 18 per cent of the global disease burden.”([[Oxfam]], Briefing paper on [[GlaxoSmithKline]], 2001). This failure, in effect, kills untold numbers of people every year. It is the fault of the pharmaceutical industry putting their company profits above the lives of people, but it is also the fault of governments and other bodies like the [[United Nations]] for depending on market forces to provide people with basic necessities. <ref> [http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=325#animal Medicine Development] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[GlaxoSmithKline]] dominates the $4 billion a year AIDS drugs market. It has been singled out by numerous public health, relief, and charitable agencies such as [[Oxfam]] and [[Médecins Sans Frontières]] for its persistent use of stall tactics, litigation, and threats in order to maintain high AIDS drug prices despite the unrelenting global pandemic.
| |
| − | | |
| − | In 2001 [[GSK]] ''attempted to block legislation that would allow the government to import or manufacture generic aids drugs to treat the 4.7 million South Africans who were HIV positive''. Thanks to massive global protests which shattered the whole industry's public image, the case was unconditionally dropped by the thirty nine companies contesting the case. However, the case had managed to delay South Africa's treatment programme by three years. According to [[Oxfam]], countless thousands of lives could have been saved if the drugs giants had not blocked access to treatment in 1997. <ref>
| |
| − | [http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2872 AIDs treatment for South Africans blocked by GlaxoSmithKline] <ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ''Products''
| |
| | | | |
| | [[Lucozade]] - The family of [[Lucozade]] products is designed to give you an edge. <ref> [http://www.gsk.com/products/consumer_healthcare/dw_lucozade.htm [[Lucozade]]] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> | | [[Lucozade]] - The family of [[Lucozade]] products is designed to give you an edge. <ref> [http://www.gsk.com/products/consumer_healthcare/dw_lucozade.htm [[Lucozade]]] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> |
| Line 46: |
Line 21: |
| | Sodium benzoate (E211), an artificial food preservative. A research study published by the [[Food Standards Age]]ncy (FSA) in September 2007 showed that mixtures of artificial food colourings and sodium benzoate '''could affect hyperactive behaviour''' in susceptible children.According to the FSA, studies have also shown that sodium benzoate and other benzoates (E210, E211, E212, E213, E214, E215, E216, E217, E218 and E219) could make the '''symptoms of asthma and eczema worse in children''' who already have these conditions. Under [[EC]] guidelines, medicines should carry a warning that sodium benzoate and other benzoates may be “mildly irritant to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes”. Foods and drinks carry no such warning, despite been consumed in much greater quantities. <ref> [http://www.actiononadditives.com/additives.php#7 Sodium Benzoate E211] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> | | Sodium benzoate (E211), an artificial food preservative. A research study published by the [[Food Standards Age]]ncy (FSA) in September 2007 showed that mixtures of artificial food colourings and sodium benzoate '''could affect hyperactive behaviour''' in susceptible children.According to the FSA, studies have also shown that sodium benzoate and other benzoates (E210, E211, E212, E213, E214, E215, E216, E217, E218 and E219) could make the '''symptoms of asthma and eczema worse in children''' who already have these conditions. Under [[EC]] guidelines, medicines should carry a warning that sodium benzoate and other benzoates may be “mildly irritant to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes”. Foods and drinks carry no such warning, despite been consumed in much greater quantities. <ref> [http://www.actiononadditives.com/additives.php#7 Sodium Benzoate E211] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref> |
| | | | |
| − | ==Abbot Laboratories== | + | ==Notes== |
| − | | + | <references/> |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ''Failing Global Health Needs''
| |
| − | | |
| − | Despite being claiming to offer a vital HIV drug at cost price to the developing world, [[Abbot]] failed to register or supply the heat stable version of its drug Kaletra in any African countries.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Jan 2006 decided to withdraw 7 life saving drugs from Thai market in retaliation for the Thais attempting to access low costing generic versions of essential drugs incl. the important HIV drug Kaletra. The process of importaing/making cheaper drugs is called cumpolsory licensing and is expressly permitted under international trade rules.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Aids is a leading cause of death in Thailand, where 600,000 peopel are living with HIV. Increasing no.s of people are becoming resistant to first-line HIV treatment and thus need access to more expensive second-line drugs, such as Kaletra.<ref> [http://peopleandplanet.org/dl/abbottpressreleaseapril2007.pdf People and Planet Report 2007] </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Deloitte==
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | All of Bush's ten largest donors for the period are linked to bundlers who have pledged to donate from $100,000 to $250,000 as part of the president's Pioneer and Ranger Programs. "Rangers," = fundraisers who pledge to raise $250,000 for the president.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Seven of the ten are financial services companies:
| |
| − | The largest donors for the quarter were [[Pricewaterhouse Coopers]] ($122,750), [[MBNA Corp]]. ($93,750), [[Deloitte & Touche]] LLP ($73,525), [[Southern Co.]] ($67,147), and [[Goldman Sachs Group]] ($65,750).
| |
| − | The other 3 donors were [[Merrill Lynch & Co]]. Inc. ($58,904), [[United Services Automobile Association Group]] ($57,775), [[Rooney Holdings/Rooney Brothers]] ($56,000), and [[UBS AG]] Inc. ($54,850).<ref> [http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11331 Dubya's Donors] accessed 23 February 2008 </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | May 1, 2003 the Wall Street Journal reported that the Bush administration has “drafted sweeping plans to remake Iraq’s economy in the U.S. image.” To this end the U.S. is planning to privatize state-owned enterprises, create a modernized Baghdad stock exchange, a reformed central bank, and rewrite the tariff and tax code systems. The plan was officially released on June 6.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''“'''Economic Recovery, Reform and Sustained Growth in Iraq'''”''' - continues the trend in recent [[USAID RFPs]] for work supporting the U.S. occupation by “limiting competition” to only ten firms. The firms eligible to apply for this contract are: [[Bearing Point]]; [[Booz, Allen and Hamilton]]; [[Nathan]]; [[IBM Global Services]]; [[Development Alternatives, Inc]].; [[Carana]]; [[Abt Associates]]; [[Chemonics]]; [[Deloitte & Touche]]; and [[Financial Markets International, Inc]].
| |
| − | The[[RFP]] goes on to outline plans to “rationalize” and “modernize” the Iraqi banking and financial sectors, create taxation, legal and regulatory regimes to facilitate this process, along with the further integration of Iraq into international economic networks. It also calls for a public relations campaign to sell these fundamental changes to the Iraqi people.
| |
| − | <ref> [http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11154&printsafe=1 Involvemnet in Iraq] accessed 23 Februarry 2008 </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Rio Tinto=
| |
| − | | |
| − | Our approach to sustainable development embedded through all levels of our organisation from our Chief executive and Chairman through to the day to day operations. We try to minimise the adverse effects of our activities and improve every aspect our performance. In addition, wherever we operate, we hold the health and safety of our employees and the environment to be a core value.
| |
| − | | |
| − | We work as closely as possible with our host countries and communities, respecting their laws and customs and ensuring a fair share of benefits and opportunities. <ref> [http://www.riotinto.com/ourapproach/sustainabledevelopment.asp Rio Tinto's sustainable development approach] </ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Depicted in the 80s as the 'ugly face of multinational capitalism', [[Rio Tinto]] is one of the three largest mining companies in the world. Its subsidiary [[Freeport]] manages the largest copper, gold and silver mine on earth: the Grasberg mine in West Papua (formerly Irĺan Jaya).
| |
| − | | |
| − | The Grasberg mine is associated with decades of serious social and environmental impacts[27]. It has been reported that [[Freeport]] is protected by a corrupt politics and that the Indonesian militia, who guard the mine, have been accused of killing indigenous people. Freeport freely admit they paid for armed security; ''during 2002 the company paid $5.6 million to the armed forces''. It has been suggested that ''the relationship between the militia and the company has led to gross human rights violations''.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Rio Tinto]] is culpable for contributing to ''environmental devastation, displacement and killing of indigenous people''. In 1996, Multinational Monitor placed [[Freeport]] in the ten worst corporations of the year for polluting areas near the copper mine; it's important that ten years later the ongoing atrocities in West Papua are not forgotten. <ref> [http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2872 Rio Tinto crimes in West Papua] </ref>
| |
GlaxoSmithKline
Animal Testing
It is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies and has a direct influence on UK Government policy, including animal experimentation policy, for which it has lobbied for a relaxation of regulations.[1]
Glaxo-SmithKline (GSK) got an emergency injunction rushed through the High Court on Tuesday May 9th to stop activists publishing names and addresses of shareholders. A letter from an unknown animal rights group had already been sent to at least 160 investors to warn them they had two weeks to sell their shares or be named on a website. Activists want to sever the drug giant’s links with doomed animal torturers Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS).
GSK actually cut ties with HLS eight years ago, after a documentary exposed some of the shocking cruelty in their animal labs - but linked up again as soon as the dust had settled a year later. Glaxo boss, Jean Pierre Garnier has been telling reporters that they’re a benevolent company really... Testing drugs on a few fluffy rabbits is OK because the goal it to save people from disease. But pharma companies spend just 0.2% of their money developing drugs for poverty related diseases like tuberculosis, which affect almost one fifth of the world’s population. Instead Glaxo prefers to pump their cash into Western vanities like slimming products, in an attempt to follow a trail of cash rather than the most common diseases.[2]
The Government publicly condemned the campaign by animal rights activists to force GSK to pull its contracts from the controversial Huntingdon Life Sciences lab.
And peers have voted through a new law which will make it harder to get hold of personal details. [3]
Products
Lucozade - The family of Lucozade products is designed to give you an edge. [4]
Ingredients - Carbonated Water, Glucose Syrup (26%), Citric Acid,Lactic Acid, Flavourings (incl. caffeine), Perservatives (Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Bisulphite), Antioxidant 9Ascorbic Acid), Colour (Sunset Yellow)[5]
Sodium benzoate (E211), an artificial food preservative. A research study published by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) in September 2007 showed that mixtures of artificial food colourings and sodium benzoate could affect hyperactive behaviour in susceptible children.According to the FSA, studies have also shown that sodium benzoate and other benzoates (E210, E211, E212, E213, E214, E215, E216, E217, E218 and E219) could make the symptoms of asthma and eczema worse in children who already have these conditions. Under EC guidelines, medicines should carry a warning that sodium benzoate and other benzoates may be “mildly irritant to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes”. Foods and drinks carry no such warning, despite been consumed in much greater quantities. [6]
Notes
