Difference between revisions of "Gios Auteri"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{Template:Pharma_Portal_badge}} Gios Auteri is an 'Independent Professional Training & Coaching Professional' working in Melbourne, Australia. <ref>Linked In [http://www.linkedin.com/pub...)
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:Pharma_Portal_badge}}
 
{{Template:Pharma_Portal_badge}}
  
Gios Auteri is an 'Independent Professional Training & Coaching Professional' working in Melbourne, Australia. <ref>Linked In [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/gios-auteri/a/560/856 Gios Auteri] Accessed 19 November 2009.</ref> He was the Business Manager at [[Excerpta Medica]] Australia from 2002 to 2004, around the time the publisher had teamed up with [[Merck]] to publish fake journals..<ref>Sheldon Krimsky. 'Looks like an independently refereed journal? Don't be too sure; In medical publishing, the line between editorial and advertorial has become dangerously blurred', ''New Scientist'', June 6, 2009, Comment and Analysis; Pg. 24-25
+
[[Gios Auteri]] is an 'Independent Professional Training & Coaching Professional' working in Melbourne, Australia. <ref>Linked In [http://www.linkedin.com/pub/gios-auteri/a/560/856 Gios Auteri] Accessed 19 November 2009.</ref> He was the Business Manager at [[Excerpta Medica]] Australia from 2002 to 2004, around the time the publisher had teamed up with [[Merck]] to produce journals which an article in the life sciences magazine, The Scientist, called "fake".<ref>Bob Grant, [http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55679/ Elsevier published 6 fake journals], TheScientist.com, 7 May 2009, accessed 20 Nov 2009</ref><ref>Sheldon Krimsky. '[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B83WY-4WGD8SD-1C&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1101260611&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=f236dae86e264bed2fcafa2b928bba17 Looks like an independently refereed journal? Don't be too sure; In medical publishing, the line between editorial and advertorial has become dangerously blurred]', ''New Scientist'', June 6, 2009, Comment and Analysis; Pg. 24-25</ref>
</ref>
 
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==
 +
 +
See [[Excerpta Medica]] for the story of the "fake" journals.
  
 
'''Screengrabs from Excerpta Medica's website from 2002-2004'''
 
'''Screengrabs from Excerpta Medica's website from 2002-2004'''
  
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040917041519/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Exerpta Medica]Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 September 2004 on 26 August 2009.   
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040917041519/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Excerpta Medica]Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 September 2004 on 26 August 2009.   
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040610032301/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Exerpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 10 June 2004 on 26 August 2009.  
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040610032301/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Excerpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 10 June 2004 on 26 August 2009.  
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040214043929/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Exerpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 February 2004 on 26 August 2009.  
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20040214043929/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Excerpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 February 2004 on 26 August 2009.  
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20031204161734/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Experpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 4 December 2003 on 26 August 2009.  
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20031204161734/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Excerpta Medica] Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 4 December 2003 on 26 August 2009.  
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20021206080702/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Experpta Medica]Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 6 December 2002 on 26 August 2009.
+
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20021206080702/www.excerptamedica.com/hq/ Excerpta Medica]Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 6 December 2002 on 26 August 2009.
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==

Latest revision as of 14:33, 20 November 2009

Pharma badge.jpg This article is part of the Pharma_Portal project of Spinwatch.

Gios Auteri is an 'Independent Professional Training & Coaching Professional' working in Melbourne, Australia. [1] He was the Business Manager at Excerpta Medica Australia from 2002 to 2004, around the time the publisher had teamed up with Merck to produce journals which an article in the life sciences magazine, The Scientist, called "fake".[2][3]

Resources

See Excerpta Medica for the story of the "fake" journals.

Screengrabs from Excerpta Medica's website from 2002-2004

  • Excerpta MedicaRetrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 September 2004 on 26 August 2009.
  • Excerpta Medica Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 10 June 2004 on 26 August 2009.
  • Excerpta Medica Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 17 February 2004 on 26 August 2009.
  • Excerpta Medica Retrieved from the Internet Archive of 4 December 2003 on 26 August 2009.
  • Excerpta MedicaRetrieved from the Internet Archive of 6 December 2002 on 26 August 2009.

Notes

  1. Linked In Gios Auteri Accessed 19 November 2009.
  2. Bob Grant, Elsevier published 6 fake journals, TheScientist.com, 7 May 2009, accessed 20 Nov 2009
  3. Sheldon Krimsky. 'Looks like an independently refereed journal? Don't be too sure; In medical publishing, the line between editorial and advertorial has become dangerously blurred', New Scientist, June 6, 2009, Comment and Analysis; Pg. 24-25