Difference between revisions of "George Carey"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Public activity since retirement)
m (opposed Williams nomination)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
In a review of Carey's autobiography, writer Michael Arditti notes that:
 
In a review of Carey's autobiography, writer Michael Arditti notes that:
 
::His eleven years in office were marked by unprecedented public criticism. He managed to alienate many of his natural supporters on the Evangelical wing of the Church, as well as both the Liberal and Conservative opposition. He was, arguably, the most excoriated archbishop since the execution of Charles I’s favourite, William Laud.<ref>Michael Arditti, [http://www.michaelarditti.com/non-fiction/know-the-truth/ Know the Truth], Daily Mail, 11 June 2006, archived at michaelarditt.com.</ref>
 
::His eleven years in office were marked by unprecedented public criticism. He managed to alienate many of his natural supporters on the Evangelical wing of the Church, as well as both the Liberal and Conservative opposition. He was, arguably, the most excoriated archbishop since the execution of Charles I’s favourite, William Laud.<ref>Michael Arditti, [http://www.michaelarditti.com/non-fiction/know-the-truth/ Know the Truth], Daily Mail, 11 June 2006, archived at michaelarditt.com.</ref>
 +
 +
In 1998, Carey opposed [[Rowan Williams]]' nomination as Bishop of Southwark.<ref>Christopher Morgan, [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article706135.ece Open letter tells Carey: end feud with archbishop], 16 April 2006.</ref> The episode would be recalled by the Guardian in 2006, when it stated that "it is an open secret that there is little personal warmth" between Carey and Williams, who succeeded him as Archbishop.<ref>Stephen Bates, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/apr/24/religion.world Lord Carey hits back at critics' open letter], The Guardian, 24 April 2006.</ref>
 +
  
 
Among the issues which divided the Church during Carey's tenure was homosexuality. Carey set out his own position in an interview with [[David Frost]] to mark his retirement as Archbishop in 2002:
 
Among the issues which divided the Church during Carey's tenure was homosexuality. Carey set out his own position in an interview with [[David Frost]] to mark his retirement as Archbishop in 2002:

Revision as of 22:36, 19 April 2010

George Carey was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1991 to 2002.[1]

Archbishop of Canterbury

In a review of Carey's autobiography, writer Michael Arditti notes that:

His eleven years in office were marked by unprecedented public criticism. He managed to alienate many of his natural supporters on the Evangelical wing of the Church, as well as both the Liberal and Conservative opposition. He was, arguably, the most excoriated archbishop since the execution of Charles I’s favourite, William Laud.[2]

In 1998, Carey opposed Rowan Williams' nomination as Bishop of Southwark.[3] The episode would be recalled by the Guardian in 2006, when it stated that "it is an open secret that there is little personal warmth" between Carey and Williams, who succeeded him as Archbishop.[4]


Among the issues which divided the Church during Carey's tenure was homosexuality. Carey set out his own position in an interview with David Frost to mark his retirement as Archbishop in 2002:

I think the issue of homosexuality - and I do respect homosexuals by the way and I've got many friends who are homosexuals, they know I disagree with practising homosexual, they know I do not want practising homosexuals in the priesthood, they're well aware of that, but it's a debate that is still going on. I'm not silencing the disagreement and the debate - it must be with us because homosexuals are people, made in the likeness of God, so we have to treasure them.[5]

Public activity since retirement

In March 2004, Lord Carey delivered a speech on Islam at the Gregorian University. He said that Islam had "contributed greatly the human family and still has much to offer, but added that "wherever we look, Islam seems to be embroiled in conflict with other faiths and other cultures."

It is in opposition to practically every other world religion- to Judaism in the Middle East; to Christianity in the West, in Nigeria, and in the Middle East; to Hinduism in India; to Buddhism, especially since the destruction of the Temples in Afghanistan.
We are presented therefore with a huge puzzle concerning Islam. Why is it associated with violence throughout the world? Is extremism so ineluctably bound up with its faith that we are at last seeing its true character? Or could it be that a fight for the soul of Islam is going on that requires another great faith, Christianity, to support and encourage the vast majority of Muslims who resist this identification of their faith with terrorism?[6]

Carey returned to the subject in his Sternberg lecture at the University of Leicester on 12 May 2004, saying that his previous speech "attracted a great deal of attention because of newspaper reports of the lecture that seemed to suggest that I was particularly hostile to the Muslim world."[7]

those who thought my Gregorian lecture was critical of the Muslim world were looking in the wrong direction. For those who took the trouble to read my lecture will have noted that I was as critical of the West, of Christianity and, for that matter, also sharply critical of Israel’s policy with respect to Palestine.[8]

In February 2006, Carey told the Jerusalem Post he was "ashamed to be an Anglican" after the Church of England voted to divest from companies suppling to Israeli Government in the occupied territories.

The February 6 divestment vote, which was backed by current Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, was "a most regrettable and one-sided statement," Lord Carey said, and one that "ignores the trauma of ordinary Jewish people" in Israel subjected to terrorist attacks. Lord Carey joined Jewish leaders protesting the vote by the General Synod, the church's legislature, to adopt a "morally responsible investment in the Palestinian occupied territories and, in particular, to disinvest from companies profiting from the illegal occupation, such as Caterpillar Inc., until they change their policies."[9]

At Easter 2006, the Sunday Times revealed the contents of an open letter being drawn up by critics of Lord Carey.[10]

The letter accused Carey of being "discourteous to Archbishop Rowan Williams, as he attempts to hold together the Anglican Communion of churches at a particularly difficult time." It continued "you appear to be offering yourself as an alternative leader. The Archbishop of Canterbury deserves our respect and support, not the disloyalty which you currently display."[11]

According to the Guardian, the letter attracted 130 signatures but failed to win support from senior clerics. Lord Carey responded:

"I think this is a mischievous letter from Australia and I hope the authors will reflect and repent on what is most unfair. It is ill founded and the authors did not have the courtesy to consult me first. This is un-Christian and to send it out at Easter damages our whole unity and what we are trying to do."[12]

Damian Thompson wrote of Carey in November 2006:

As Primate of All England, he was dismissed as a self-important booby: Captain Mainwaring in a mitre. Since his retirement in 2002, however, he has become "the king over the water" for conservative evangelical Anglicans, who – thanks to mushrooming churches in Africa – now far outnumber communicants of the Church of England.[13]

Shirley Chaplin case

Lord Carey led a group of six Anglican bishops who wrote to the Sunday Telegraph on 28 March 2010 in support of Shirley Chaplin, a nurse involved in an employment tribunal with the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust over her right to wear a cross while at work.[14]

The Bishops stated:

This is yet another case in which the religious rights of the Christian community are being treated with disrespect. We are deeply concerned at the apparent discrimination shown against Christians and we call on the Government to remedy this serious development.
In a number of cases, Christian beliefs on marriage, conscience and worship are simply not being upheld. There have been numerous dismissals of practising Christians from employment for reasons that are unacceptable in a civilised country. We believe that the major parties need to address this issue in the coming general election.[15]

The signatories included Lord Carey; the Rt Rev Michael Scott-Joynt, Bishop of Winchester; Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, Former Bishop of Rochester; Rt Rev Peter Forster, Bishop of Chester; Rt Rev Anthony Priddis; Bishop of Hereford; Rt Revd Nicholas Reade, Bishop of Blackburn.ref>The religious rights of Christians are treated with disrespect, The Daily Telegraph, 19 April 2010.</ref>


Affiliations

Connections

External Resources

Contact

Notes

  1. Biography, Official Website of Lord Carey of Clifton, accessed 16 February 2010.
  2. Michael Arditti, Know the Truth, Daily Mail, 11 June 2006, archived at michaelarditt.com.
  3. Christopher Morgan, Open letter tells Carey: end feud with archbishop, 16 April 2006.
  4. Stephen Bates, Lord Carey hits back at critics' open letter, The Guardian, 24 April 2006.
  5. Breakfast with Frost, BBC, 27 October 2002.
  6. Lord Carey, Christianity and Islam: Collision or convergence?, 25 March 2004, archived at glcarey.co.uk.
  7. Lord Carey, Islam and the West: The Challenge to the Human Family, 12 May 2004.
  8. Lord Carey, Islam and the West: The Challenge to the Human Family, 12 May 2004.
  9. George Confer, Lord Carey 'ashamed to be an Anglican', 8 February 2006.
  10. Christopher Morgan, Open letter tells Carey: end feud with archbishop, 16 April 2006.
  11. Open letter to Lord Carey of Clifton, Sunday Times, 16 April 2006.
  12. Stephen Bates, Lord Carey hits back at critics' open letter, The Guardian, 24 April 2006.
  13. Damian Thompson, The archbishop's days are numbered, telegraph.co.uk, 24 November 2006.
  14. The religious rights of Christians are treated with disrespect, The Daily Telegraph, 19 April 2010.
  15. The religious rights of Christians are treated with disrespect, The Daily Telegraph, 19 April 2010.