Difference between revisions of "Carol Tucker Foreman"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
An article for the ''Agribusiness Examiner'' calls [[Carol Tucker Foreman]] a former "outspoken lobbyist on behalf of Monsanto's rBGH: (a GM bovine growth hormone that is banned in Europe and Canada but allowed in the US).<ref>A.V. Krebs, "[http://www.organicconsumers.org/irrad/ctf.cfm Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective]", The Agribusiness Examiner, Issue 34, May 19, 1999, accessed 4 May 2009</ref> | An article for the ''Agribusiness Examiner'' calls [[Carol Tucker Foreman]] a former "outspoken lobbyist on behalf of Monsanto's rBGH: (a GM bovine growth hormone that is banned in Europe and Canada but allowed in the US).<ref>A.V. Krebs, "[http://www.organicconsumers.org/irrad/ctf.cfm Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective]", The Agribusiness Examiner, Issue 34, May 19, 1999, accessed 4 May 2009</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rod Leonard, a consumer activist and executive director of the Community Nutrition Institute, writes in an article for the Agribusiness Examiner that Foreman made a food safety decision in her role as Assistant Secretary of Agriculture that led to the presence of dangerous drug resistant bacteria in poultry: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Carol Foreman ... approved ... a change in food safety procedures that would have far reaching consequences. Foreman, one of only a few consumer advocates to reach so high a federal post, decided that poultry visibly smeared with fecal matter could be safely eaten after the feces was washed away. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Any expert on bacteria could have told her then feces carry harmful bacteria which are invisible and which remain, clinging tightly to surfaces, despite repeated washing. Federal inspectors, until Foreman's ruling, would condemn the contaminated bird as unsafe or require the visible contaminated part to be cut away. The washing rule was a profitable boon to poultry processors who no longer faced the loss of unsafe product. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The new Foreman policy also sent a clear message to the poultry industry that the federal government had no major concern with invisible fecal contamination. The response was predictable. Within a year, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported a substantial jump in the incidence of food poisoning that rose each following year.<ref>Rod Leonard, cited in A.V. Krebs, "[http://www.organicconsumers.org/irrad/ctf.cfm Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective]", The Agribusiness Examiner, Issue 34, May 19, 1999, accessed 4 May 2009</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | At a press conference about poultry contamination convened by Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), according to a CSPI press release, Carol Tucker Foreman | ||
| + | :declared that she erred in 1978 by permitting poultry producers to wash, rather than destroy, chickens and turkeys contaminated with feces. Foreman and CSPI today called on the current USDA leadership to tighten those "reprocessing" rules, since fecal contamination is a prime cause of bacterial infestation of poultry.<ref>"[http://www.cspinet.org/new/polt.html New Report Says Inadequate Poultry Inspection is "Playing Chicken" With Consumers' Lives: Upcoming USDA Rules Being Weakened Under Industry and Congressional Pressure, Consumer Group Charges]", CSPI press release, 13 March 1996, accessed May 4 2009</ref> | ||
==Biographical Information== | ==Biographical Information== | ||
Revision as of 19:32, 5 May 2009
Carol Tucker Foreman is director of Consumer Federation of America's (CFA) Food Policy Institute. Between 1973 and 1977 she was the executive director of the CFA. She was Assistant Secretary of Agriculture in the Jimmy Carter administration (1977-81).
An article for the Agribusiness Examiner calls Carol Tucker Foreman a former "outspoken lobbyist on behalf of Monsanto's rBGH: (a GM bovine growth hormone that is banned in Europe and Canada but allowed in the US).[1]
Rod Leonard, a consumer activist and executive director of the Community Nutrition Institute, writes in an article for the Agribusiness Examiner that Foreman made a food safety decision in her role as Assistant Secretary of Agriculture that led to the presence of dangerous drug resistant bacteria in poultry:
- Carol Foreman ... approved ... a change in food safety procedures that would have far reaching consequences. Foreman, one of only a few consumer advocates to reach so high a federal post, decided that poultry visibly smeared with fecal matter could be safely eaten after the feces was washed away.
- Any expert on bacteria could have told her then feces carry harmful bacteria which are invisible and which remain, clinging tightly to surfaces, despite repeated washing. Federal inspectors, until Foreman's ruling, would condemn the contaminated bird as unsafe or require the visible contaminated part to be cut away. The washing rule was a profitable boon to poultry processors who no longer faced the loss of unsafe product.
- The new Foreman policy also sent a clear message to the poultry industry that the federal government had no major concern with invisible fecal contamination. The response was predictable. Within a year, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported a substantial jump in the incidence of food poisoning that rose each following year.[2]
At a press conference about poultry contamination convened by Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), according to a CSPI press release, Carol Tucker Foreman
- declared that she erred in 1978 by permitting poultry producers to wash, rather than destroy, chickens and turkeys contaminated with feces. Foreman and CSPI today called on the current USDA leadership to tighten those "reprocessing" rules, since fecal contamination is a prime cause of bacterial infestation of poultry.[3]
Contents
Biographical Information
History
Current activities
Views
Affiliations
- Director, Food Policy Institute, Consumer Federation of America
- 2002-2006 Advisory Panel member, DuPont Biotechnology[4][5]
- 1977-1981 Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Consumer Affairs in the Jimmy Carter administration
People
Funding
Clients
Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes
Publications
Contact
- Address:
- Phone:
- Email:
- Website:
Resources
Notes
- ↑ A.V. Krebs, "Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective", The Agribusiness Examiner, Issue 34, May 19, 1999, accessed 4 May 2009
- ↑ Rod Leonard, cited in A.V. Krebs, "Monitoring Corporate Agribusiness From a Public Interest Perspective", The Agribusiness Examiner, Issue 34, May 19, 1999, accessed 4 May 2009
- ↑ "New Report Says Inadequate Poultry Inspection is "Playing Chicken" With Consumers' Lives: Upcoming USDA Rules Being Weakened Under Industry and Congressional Pressure, Consumer Group Charges", CSPI press release, 13 March 1996, accessed May 4 2009
- ↑ 'Advisory Panel", DuPont Biotechnology website, version placed in web archive 22 Feb 2006, accessed in web archive 4 May 2009
- ↑ "Biotech Advisory Panel Alumni", DuPont website, accessed May 4 2009
