Martin Peretz

From Powerbase
Revision as of 19:54, 30 September 2010 by Idrees (talk | contribs) (Islamophobia)
Jump to: navigation, search

<youtube size="tiny" align="right" caption="Brandeis University hails Peretz's achievements despite his controversial views">oAOFi7DynFg</youtube><youtube size="tiny" align="right" caption="Party for Marty: Harvard students protest Martin Peretz for his anti-Muslim/Arab comments">Z3hLOO3YFM8</youtube> Martin H. Peretz (born 6 December 1938) is the part-owner and editor-in-chief of The New Republic. He is known for his extreme hawkish views on Israel and his unconcealed antipathy towards Arabs and Muslims. He is a member of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy's Board of Advisors.[1]

The Israel Prism

For media scholar Eric Alterman, '[i]t is really not too much to say that almost all of Peretz's political beliefs are subordinate to his commitment to Israel's best interests, and these interests as Peretz defines them almost always involve more war.'[2] He adds:

Peretz insists that, yes, the interests of Israel and the United States are indeed identical. "Support for Israel," he claims, "is deep down, an expression of America's best view of itself." Which begs the question of just what "support" entails. For Peretz it has clearly meant support both for the Iraq war and, now, for yet another war against Iran.[2]

Islamophobia

Peretz has been criticised for his views on Muslims, particularly Arabs. Alterman has excoriated Peretz for 'his obsessive and unapologetic hatred of Arabs' which is 'visible nearly every day on Peretz's blog "The Spine."' Alterman goes on to provide a sample of Peretz's comments about Arabs.

They are "violent, fratricidal, unreliable, primitive and crazed … barbarian"; they have created a "wretched society" and are "cruel, belligerent, intolerant, fearing"; they are "murderous and grotesque" and "can't even run a post office"; their societies "have gone bonkers over jihad" and they are "feigning outrage when they protest what they call American (or Israeli) atrocities"; they "behave like lemmings," and "are not shocked at all by what in truth must seem to them not atrocious at all"; and to top it all off, their rugs are not as "subtle" and are more "glimmery" than those of the Berbers.[2]

On another occasion, Peretz has declared that 'frankly, Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims'. He added:

I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment, which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.[3]

For liberal blogger Glenn Greenwald Peretz's blog is 'basically a museum for every anti-Arab/Muslim stereotype and caricature that exists.'[4] Peretz's bigotry eventually led to a rift within the magazine's own editorial board after he declared that the first amendment should not extend to American Muslims. It led to a public row between Peretz and the magazine's long-serving literary editor (also chief deputy editor) Leon Wieseltier.[5] On the other hand, Peretz was defended by former charge Andrew Sullivan and influential Israel lobby journalist Jeffrey Goldberg (all three had pushed for the Iraq war).[6]

Peretz has also compared the Quran, the Muslim holy book, to Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto. He writes on his blog:

I've read for my sins the Koran myself, actually two and a half times. Of course, I also studied (and taught) the Communist Manifesto, and I suppose that some of my colleagues even saw in it a tract open to very soft interpretation. There are probably humane readings of Mein Kampf.[7]

Islamic Center controversy

Peretz has denounced the planned Islamic Center near Ground Zero in New York as 'a sleazy venture combining religion, marriage catering, sports activity, political propaganda and what would pretend to be kultcha'. He has described the project's planner Sharif El-Gamal as a 'real estate hustler' and Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf as the 'theological desperado.' He has praised the right-wing campaign against center.

In my view, the really modest struggle against the mosque is probably the closest thing we’ve had to a genuinely grass roots effort against the casual and elitist First Amendment fundamentalists.[3]

Peretz adds: 'yes, there are different kinds of Muslims as there are different kinds of Christian Fundamentalists.'[3] New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof cited the post as 'a glimpse of how venomous and debased the discourse about Islam has become.' Pointedly, he asked: 'Is it possible to imagine the same kind of casual slur tossed off about blacks or Jews?'[8] Peretz's statement also prompted students at his alma mater Brandeis University to issue a call for a public apology. They called his statement 'appalling...unacceptable, irresponsible, and wrong'. For the signatories, Peretz's statement viloated Brandeis's commitment to fighting 'discrimination, bigotry, and fear of minorities.'[9]

Affiliations

References

  1. Board of Advisors, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, access date 16 September 2010
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Eric Alterman, My Marty Peretz Problem -- And Ours, The American Prospect, 18 June 2007
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Martin Peretz, The New York Times Laments "A Sadly Wary Misunderstanding of Muslim-Americans." But Really Is It "Sadly Wary" Or A "Misunderstanding" At All?, TNR Spine (blog), 4 September 2010 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "gz" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Glenn Greenwald, Marty Peretz and anti-Muslim stereotypes, Unclaimed Territory, 23 September 2006
  5. J.J. Goldberg, Peretz-Wieseltier Smackdown! The Islam Menace! (Also, Yours Truly on NPR, Sunday), Forward, 5 September 2010
  6. MJ Rosenberg, Jeff Goldberg Defends Marty Peretz -- But Not That Bigot, Helen Thomas, TPMCafe, 15 September 2010
  7. Martin Peretz, Certified By The (New York) Times, TNR The Spine (blog), 16 May 2010
  8. Nicholas Kristof, Is This America?, The New York Times, 11 September 2010
  9. Open Letter from Brandeis University to Martin Peretz '59, Organized by the Justice League, accessed 17 September 2010