Water Integrity Network
Contents
Introduction
Water Integrity Network (WIN) is a coalition of individuals and organisations self-purportedly “support(ing) anti-corruption activities in the water sector worldwide...” and promoting “solutions-oriented action and coalition-building between civil society, the private and public sectors, media and governments.”[1][2] WIN notes on their website, “If corruption in water worldwide is to be successfully contained, it requires the establishment and sustained functioning of local, national and international cross-sector coalitions made up of all stakeholders.”[3] WIN uses itself as a “primary example” of one of these coalitions. Indeed WIN does link itself with various stakeholders, notably however, with many pro-privatisation agencies such as the World Bank Water and Sanitation Programme (WSP), Aquafed – an international water industry lobby group described by the now Senior Water Advisor to the President of the UN General Assembly and National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians, Maude Barlow, as a “player in the elite transnational water policy network.”[4][5] Additional high-profile partners and organisations with a pro-privatisation persuasion, which WIN claims make “good partners” include: Global Water Partnership (GWP), World Water Council, and Cap-Net.[6]
Corruption takes many forms and occurs in both the public and private sector as WIN does indeed suggest. However, WIN’s emphasis and focus concerning corruption is on the individual or the individual misdemeanour, or that corruption is somehow indicative of the public sector in general. What is missing from WIN’s analysis of corruption, and this is evident from a survey of their ‘Glossary and Acronyms’ index, which serves to define the parameters and nature of corruption as understood by WIN – and they do this by defining frequently used concepts in the water governance community - is a systemic analyses of the reasons for and nature of corruption.
For example, to explore WIN’s ambiguity over the private sector, especially in terms of WIN's ambiguous position concerning the private sector's profit motive as the primary source corruption, we turn to WIN’s definition of integrity. Integrity, as defined by WIN refers to “the need for public officials to be honest in carrying out their functions and to ensure that they are immune from being corrupted. It requires that holders of public office do not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to individuals or organisations that may influence them in the performance of their duties”[7] From this definition one may deduce that integrity, according to WIN, is a question of confidence only concerning public officials and that corruption originates and arrives in the form of public corruption.
Conversely, however, one could argue that corruption is, in the first instance, predicated on the existence of a private sector. The Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), based at the University of Greenwich, argues, “corruption is a systemic feature of privatisation processes.” They continue, “corruption happens because bribery is a method by which companies can gain higher returns: either by winning contracts or concessions which they would not otherwise have won, or by gaining contracts or concession on more favourable, and so more profitable, terms.”[8] The World Bank itself, in an article entitled, “The Political Economy of Corruption: Causes and Consequences”, suggests, “... the privatisation process itself can create corrupt incentives.”[9] In other words, corruption has come to play an integral part of the privatisation process where private firms compete for billions of dollars worth of procurement contracts. Indeed, as WIN notes, public officials are often complicit in corruption schemes. However, and as the World Bank confirms, “corruption thrives in an environment where the power of individual members of society is measured in terms of access to people in power… ”[10] In other words, wealth and power in the private sector is often defined by access to public figures in power; but again, this is symptomatic of the need for the private sector to continuously seek out higher returns. The World Bank points out, “bribes are paid for two reasons: to obtain government benefits and to avoid costs.”[11]
Founding Members
According to WIN:
WIN was founded in 2006 by some of the most active and well-known international water sector organisations and the leading global anti-corruption organisations. The founding members are:
- IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre The IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre is a globally known water and sanitation organisation and has facilitated the sharing, promotion and use of knowledge so that governments, professionals and organisations can better support poor men, women and children in developing countries to obtain water and sanitation services they use and maintain.
- Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) The Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) is a policy institute that seeks sustainable solutions to the world’s water problems. SIWI manages projects, synthesises research and publishes findings and recommendations on current and future water, environment, governance and human development issues. SIWI also hosts one of the other WIN partners, the Swedish Water House, a government-funded initiative that promotes network-building among Sweden-based internationally oriented academic institutions, consultants, government agencies, civil society organisations, and other stakeholders.
- Transparency International (TI) Transparency International, the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption, brings people together in a powerful worldwide coalition to end the devastating impact of corruption on men, women and children around the world. The TI secretariat is based in Berlin and is host to the WIN secretariat.
- Water and Sanitation Program-Africa (WSP-AF) The Water and Sanitation Program (WSP) is a multi-donor partnership of the World Bank with the goal of helping the poor gain sustained access to improved water supply and sanitation services. The program disseminates best practices across regions and places a strong focus on capacity building by forming partnerships with non-governmental organisations, governments at all levels, community organisations, private industry, and donors.
- The WIN is currently funded by the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) | German Federal Ministry of Economic Development and Development (BMZ)
- The WIN secretariat is hosted by: Transparency International-Secretariat (TI-S)
People
WIN Steering Committee
- Dr. Håkan Tropp - Chair Project Director Stockholm International Water Institute (Sweden)
- Dr. John Butterworth Programme Officer, Knowledge Development & Advocacy IRC – International Water and Sanitation Centre (Netherlands)
- Jack Moss Senior Adviser Aquafed (France) - The pre-eminent corporate lobby group for the international water industry.
- Dr. Donal O’Leary Senior Adviser Transparency International (Germany)
- Melody Diobodo Ogwezzy Chief Executive and Programme Coordinator Community Integrity Initiative (Nigeria)
- Janelle Plummer Anti-Corruption Adviser World Bank
- Ramesh Kumar Sharma Regional Manager Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Fund Development Board (Nepal)
- Antonio Tujan Jr. International Director IBON Foundation (Philippines)
- Henk Van Norden Senior Adviser Water, Environment and Sanitation (WES) section - UNICEF (United States)
- Franz-Josef Batz Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Water Politics Department (Germany) [12].
Website
References
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), About Us, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), What is WIN?, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), What is WIN?, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), What is WIN?, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Maude Barlow, (2007) ‘Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Coming Battle For the Right to Water’, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Ltd., p.51.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), Forming Coalitions for Advocacy, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network (WIN), [1], accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), Privatisation, Multinationals, and Corruption, accessed 18 June 2009, p.4.
- ↑ World Bank, The Political Economy of Corruption: Causes and Consequences access 18 June 2009, p.
- ↑ World Bank, Corruption, Poverty and Inequality, accessed 18 June 2009.
- ↑ World Bank, The Political Economy of Corruption: Causes and Consequences access 18 June 2009, p.
- ↑ Water Integrity Network International Steering Committee Accessed 27th May 2009