Globalisation:Global Warming Policy Foundation: Views on climate change

From Powerbase
Revision as of 18:29, 9 November 2010 by Sarah Donald (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

The GWPF are not concerned with the science behind climate change, they are more interested in political, economic and social aspects of climate change "Our main focus is to analyse global warming policies and its economic and other implications. Our aim is to provide the most robust and reliable economic analysis and advice"[1].

A recent debate (11th June 2010) between sociologist and New Labour philosopher king Anthony 'Third Way' Giddens, former director of the London School of Economics, and former Chancellor Lord Nigel Lawson.


Giddens said "'the science' showed humans were wreaking terrible havoc on natural systems, that this science was robust, and the science also had a clear policy message: we must change our ways. "We're interfering in the climate in a radical and irreversible way ... We must take action now"

Lawson argues "the science was anything but robust ("It's more uncertain the more you look"), but that didn't matter so much as choosing the right policy responses. For Lawson, efforts to reduce CO2 emissions were all futile gestures - they wouldn't work, and they'd only end up costing us dearly. That's because China and India will not halt economic development, which for now, is largely dependent on abundant and cheap fossil fuels"[2].

  1. GWPF "Who we are", accessed 23.10.10
  2. GWPF "Debate:Giddens And Lawson Argue Quite Sensibly On Climate Change", accessed 9.11.10