Difference between revisions of "User talk:Miriam Rose"
(good stuff - formatting and tone) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 11:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:David|David]] 11:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == good stuff - formatting and tone == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Good work on the various lobby groups. some suggestions. Look at the formatting changes I made to the [[Climate Group]] page and in particular the use of colons to indent para's. Also on tone: can you try and avoid evaluations such as calling the corporations 'dirty' unless you can provide evidence there and then. We try and keep the database as factual as possible in order that it can be more useful. | ||
| + | |||
| + | also, in building a profile you should list al the member of any organisation. if it is a longish list then it should go at the bottom of the page and then you can refer in summary to some of the more important/dodgy companies further up. Make sense? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Keep up the good work | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 19:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 12 February 2009
To 'wikify' that list of members of the Wind energy assoc do the following:
- paste into word.
- use find and replace command in the edit menu
- Find ^p (paragraph mark)
- replace with ]] | [[
- paste back into spinprofiles
- .... that's it!!
--David 11:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
good stuff - formatting and tone
Good work on the various lobby groups. some suggestions. Look at the formatting changes I made to the Climate Group page and in particular the use of colons to indent para's. Also on tone: can you try and avoid evaluations such as calling the corporations 'dirty' unless you can provide evidence there and then. We try and keep the database as factual as possible in order that it can be more useful.
also, in building a profile you should list al the member of any organisation. if it is a longish list then it should go at the bottom of the page and then you can refer in summary to some of the more important/dodgy companies further up. Make sense?
Keep up the good work
--David 19:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
