Difference between revisions of "David Baulcombe"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Prof David Baulcombe has been Professor of Botany at Cambridge University since September 2007. He was previously Head of the Sainsbury Laboratory of the [[John Innes Centre]] (JIC), Norwich, UK, and of its Plant Molecular Virology Department. He was a researcher at the JIC from 1988-2007.  
+
Prof David Baulcombe FRS is the Chair of a controversial Royal Society Working Group on how science can enhance global food-crop production. [http://www.bioscienceresource.org/cms/documents/RoyalSocWorkingGroupLetter.pdf For more on this]
 +
 
 +
He has been Professor of Botany at Cambridge University since September 2007. He was previously Head of the Sainsbury Laboratory of the [[John Innes Centre]] (JIC), Norwich, UK, and of its Plant Molecular Virology Department. He was a researcher at the JIC from 1988-2007.  
  
 
The JIC is often described as Europe's leading plant biotechnology institute. It represents itself as an independent, charitable and mainly publicly funded institution. It has, however, received tens of millions of pounds in funding from major biotech corporations such as [[Syngenta]] and [[DuPont]]. It has also received millions in donations from the pro-biotech billionaire [[Lord David Sainsbury]], after whom the Sainsbury Laboratory is named.
 
The JIC is often described as Europe's leading plant biotechnology institute. It represents itself as an independent, charitable and mainly publicly funded institution. It has, however, received tens of millions of pounds in funding from major biotech corporations such as [[Syngenta]] and [[DuPont]]. It has also received millions in donations from the pro-biotech billionaire [[Lord David Sainsbury]], after whom the Sainsbury Laboratory is named.
Line 5: Line 7:
 
In 1999 Professor Baulcombe told a public meeting on GM crops that US government research 'to be released shortly' had shown that GM crops brought enormous environmental benefits. However, what Baulcombe presented as official US research has been [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=25&page=1&op=1 shown subsequently never to have existed].  
 
In 1999 Professor Baulcombe told a public meeting on GM crops that US government research 'to be released shortly' had shown that GM crops brought enormous environmental benefits. However, what Baulcombe presented as official US research has been [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=25&page=1&op=1 shown subsequently never to have existed].  
  
Prof Baulcombe also claimed with regard to Dr John Losey's Monarch butterfly study (which showed that Monarch butterfly larvae were killed by eating GM pollen), that 'it was actually that non-genetically modified maize pollen had damaged the butterfly'. He further claimed that 'there were no real differences' between the damage caused to the Monarch butterflies by the GM maize pollen and the non-GM pollen. Losey has pointed out that Baulcombe's claims are 'completely without merit'. Losey notes, 'Caterpillars fed on milkweed leaves with untransformed [non-GM] corn pollen suffered NO mortality while 44% of those that fed on leaves dusted with Bt-corn pollen died within 4 days.' Losey concludes, 'I assume the person who actually made this quote did not read the paper.' [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=25&page=1&op=1 For more on this].  
+
Prof Baulcombe also claimed with regard to Dr John Losey's Monarch butterfly study (which showed that Monarch butterfly larvae were killed by eating GM pollen), that 'it was actually that non-genetically modified maize pollen had damaged the butterfly'. He further claimed that 'there were no real differences' between the damage caused to the Monarch butterflies by the GM maize pollen and the non-GM pollen. Losey has pointed out that Baulcombe's claims are 'completely without merit'. Losey notes, 'Caterpillars fed on milkweed leaves with untransformed [non-GM] corn pollen suffered NO mortality while 44% of those that fed on leaves dusted with Bt-corn pollen died within 4 days.' Losey concludes, 'I assume the person who actually made this quote did not read the paper.' [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=25&page=1&op=1 For more on this].  
  
 
Prof Baulcombe has been far from alone at the John Innes Centre in promoting GM crops by means that bear little scrutiny. [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=12&page=1&op=1 More on this].
 
Prof Baulcombe has been far from alone at the John Innes Centre in promoting GM crops by means that bear little scrutiny. [http://www.lobbywatch.org/p2temp2.asp?aid=12&page=1&op=1 More on this].

Revision as of 16:27, 12 November 2008

Prof David Baulcombe FRS is the Chair of a controversial Royal Society Working Group on how science can enhance global food-crop production. For more on this

He has been Professor of Botany at Cambridge University since September 2007. He was previously Head of the Sainsbury Laboratory of the John Innes Centre (JIC), Norwich, UK, and of its Plant Molecular Virology Department. He was a researcher at the JIC from 1988-2007.

The JIC is often described as Europe's leading plant biotechnology institute. It represents itself as an independent, charitable and mainly publicly funded institution. It has, however, received tens of millions of pounds in funding from major biotech corporations such as Syngenta and DuPont. It has also received millions in donations from the pro-biotech billionaire Lord David Sainsbury, after whom the Sainsbury Laboratory is named.

In 1999 Professor Baulcombe told a public meeting on GM crops that US government research 'to be released shortly' had shown that GM crops brought enormous environmental benefits. However, what Baulcombe presented as official US research has been shown subsequently never to have existed.

Prof Baulcombe also claimed with regard to Dr John Losey's Monarch butterfly study (which showed that Monarch butterfly larvae were killed by eating GM pollen), that 'it was actually that non-genetically modified maize pollen had damaged the butterfly'. He further claimed that 'there were no real differences' between the damage caused to the Monarch butterflies by the GM maize pollen and the non-GM pollen. Losey has pointed out that Baulcombe's claims are 'completely without merit'. Losey notes, 'Caterpillars fed on milkweed leaves with untransformed [non-GM] corn pollen suffered NO mortality while 44% of those that fed on leaves dusted with Bt-corn pollen died within 4 days.' Losey concludes, 'I assume the person who actually made this quote did not read the paper.' For more on this.

Prof Baulcombe has been far from alone at the John Innes Centre in promoting GM crops by means that bear little scrutiny. More on this.