Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Shrimpton"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | The main sponsors of these vigilantes were ...-- | |
| − | The main sponsors of these vigilantes were -- | ||
| − | + | I have had to delete this whole para as there was no source given as to the sponsors of "these vigilantes", though it would be good info to have if supportable. Also, the last sentence of the para is too subjective. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
In general, it's really good. | In general, it's really good. | ||
Revision as of 11:53, 2 October 2008
The main sponsors of these vigilantes were ...--
I have had to delete this whole para as there was no source given as to the sponsors of "these vigilantes", though it would be good info to have if supportable. Also, the last sentence of the para is too subjective.
In general, it's really good. Claire
I seen old Shrimpo on Sky news' round up of the press and thought I'd have a go — you'll prob. want to section off the summit stuff but i thought I'd keep going with it and bang down as much as poss while I'm in the mood: feel free to monkey around with it - its all a first draft as such
Looks good. REmember that links to new pages need link and not [link] which seems to affect thispage strangely?
--David 14:04, 5 December 2007 (GMT)
