Difference between revisions of "User talk:Andy"
(msg) |
m (fix links, add heading) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 20:22, 12 Feb 2006 (GMT) | --[[User:David|David]] 20:22, 12 Feb 2006 (GMT) | ||
− | Hi Andy, we seem to have managed to choose the same time to start work on finishing the navbar! You'll notice from Recent Changes that i created [[Category:Civil nuclear industry]] shortly before you created [[Category:Pro-nuclear companies]]. The reason i didn't call it the latter is that these companies are surely by definition pro-nuclear, since they are nuclear industry companies. Therefore to say that BNFL, for example, is 'pro-nuclear' seems a little like stating the obvious... Cheers, --[[User:Neoconned|Neoconned]] 15:39, 13 Mar 2006 (GMT) | + | ==Finishing navbar== |
+ | |||
+ | Hi Andy, we seem to have managed to choose the same time to start work on finishing the navbar! You'll notice from Recent Changes that i created [[:Category:Civil nuclear industry]] shortly before you created [[:Category:Pro-nuclear companies]]. The reason i didn't call it the latter is that these companies are surely by definition pro-nuclear, since they are nuclear industry companies. Therefore to say that BNFL, for example, is 'pro-nuclear' seems a little like stating the obvious... Cheers, --[[User:Neoconned|Neoconned]] 15:39, 13 Mar 2006 (GMT) |
Revision as of 15:40, 13 March 2006
Is there a ref for the Mike alexander quote?
I see a lot of the refs you are using are to the press. Are they no avail online?
if so, the url should be put in...
See, how easy it is to get like Bob!
--
I didn't put the Alexander quote in -just the Coley quote - I'm trying to put as many online references in as possible!!
Andy, have a look at this: http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php?title=Talk:Supporters_of_Nuclear_Energy&rcid=4882 --David 20:22, 12 Feb 2006 (GMT)
Hi Andy, we seem to have managed to choose the same time to start work on finishing the navbar! You'll notice from Recent Changes that i created Category:Civil nuclear industry shortly before you created Category:Pro-nuclear companies. The reason i didn't call it the latter is that these companies are surely by definition pro-nuclear, since they are nuclear industry companies. Therefore to say that BNFL, for example, is 'pro-nuclear' seems a little like stating the obvious... Cheers, --Neoconned 15:39, 13 Mar 2006 (GMT)