Difference between revisions of "Powerbase:A Guide to Referencing"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The Nuclear Spin site is based on a Wiki system, such as [http://www.Wikipedia.org Wikipedia] and [http://www.Sourcewatch.org Sourcewatch] | + | |
| + | The Nuclear Spin site is based on a Wiki system, such as [http://www.Wikipedia.org Wikipedia] and [http://www.Sourcewatch.org Sourcewatch]. These websites are open access Wikis, whereas NuclearSpin is a closed Wiki. This is to stop | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you want to become involved in | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==A Guide To Referencing== | ||
For those people inputting material, when you put in a reference please use the references and citations procedure set out below. | For those people inputting material, when you put in a reference please use the references and citations procedure set out below. | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 3 March 2006
The Nuclear Spin site is based on a Wiki system, such as Wikipedia and Sourcewatch. These websites are open access Wikis, whereas NuclearSpin is a closed Wiki. This is to stop
If you want to become involved in
A Guide To Referencing
For those people inputting material, when you put in a reference please use the references and citations procedure set out below.
You generate a reference using eg. {{ref|guardianMacalister}}, and you label the corresponding citation using {{note|guardianMacalister}}. Readers can see where a given citation is referenced in the article by clicking the up-arrow link next to it.
Here's an example:
In February 2006 The Guardian reported how "A small group of American companies such as Bechtel and Fluor look set to grab the lion's share of a £50bn British nuclear clean-up programme which should get the green light within weeks but take decades to complete. [1]
External Links
- ^Terry Macalister, "Engineers in Line for jobs until 2080 on Britain's Nuclear Clean-up", The Guardian, February 16, 2005.
