Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tom Mills"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Great! | Great! | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:David|David]] 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | got a book yesterday by this guy: http://www.uscanada.bham.ac.uk/staff/hewitt.htm | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there any reason to include him in any list? | ||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 12:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:52, 25 January 2008
Hi,
I wonder about the rationale for the conference atendees selection? If you look at Herman and o'Sullivan they have a list of terrorism institutes.: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:The_%22Terrorism%22_Industry
They say that (in 1989) CSIS is one of the most influential terror think tanks. Also Rand Corporation is clearly key. do we have any way of assessing which are the most important organisations to include? Perhaps we should add RAnd and CSIS and maybe a couple of others? What do you think?
--David 11:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah I see. I think if you can put all that info on the page that would give a much better sense of what you did and why some orgs are not there. that makes the rationale much stronger.
Great! --David 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
got a book yesterday by this guy: http://www.uscanada.bham.ac.uk/staff/hewitt.htm
Is there any reason to include him in any list? --David 12:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
