Difference between revisions of "Nuclear rebuild: How the Different Newspapers Stack Up"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Against | * Against | ||
| + | |||
| + | - The Independent - Argues that the "wrong decision has laready been made". The paper argues that the government's threee month consultation "is simply the final stage of a public relations exercise designed to prepare the ground for a Prime Ministerial volte face on nuclear energy. It is a classic New Labour spin operation". [http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article340591.ece] | ||
Revision as of 10:20, 24 January 2006
- For
- The Times - Argues that "nuclear energy is necessary to bridge Britain’s energy gap" [1]
- Against
- The Independent - Argues that the "wrong decision has laready been made". The paper argues that the government's threee month consultation "is simply the final stage of a public relations exercise designed to prepare the ground for a Prime Ministerial volte face on nuclear energy. It is a classic New Labour spin operation". [2]
