Difference between revisions of "Andrew J M Sykes"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Andrew J M Sykes was Professor of Sociology at the [[University of Strahclyde]] from 1967 - 1989.{{ref|3}}  
+
Andrew J M Sykes was Professor of Sociology at the [[University of Strahclyde]] from 1967 - 1989.{{ref|3}} According to a biographical note: 'He received his doctorate in industrial sociology from Glasgow University. He taught Management Studies at Scottish College of Commerce for three years and then joined the staff at the University of Strathclyde in 1963. Professor Sykes has conducted research into social relations and attitude changes in printing, civil engineering, clerical employment, motor car assembling, social change in Ireland, industrial training and shipping.'{{ref|4}}
  
 
In 1974 Sykes was a member of a Study Group set up by the [[Institute for the Study of Conflict]] which published a report in february of that year tiotled 'Sources of conflict in British Industry'.  Other members of the Study Group were [[Ken Watkins]], [[Brian Crozier]], Prof. [[A. R. Hersic]] of Bedford College, University of London and Prof. [[Raymond Thomas]] of the University of Bath. According to Richard Cockett 'the report claimed to be a comprehensive exposure of those politically motivated Trotskist of Communist-linked trade unionists within the trade union movement, who, under cover of legitimate industrial action, sought to create a revolutionary situation.  the ISC thus drew some grave conclusions about the threat to democracy in Britain:
 
In 1974 Sykes was a member of a Study Group set up by the [[Institute for the Study of Conflict]] which published a report in february of that year tiotled 'Sources of conflict in British Industry'.  Other members of the Study Group were [[Ken Watkins]], [[Brian Crozier]], Prof. [[A. R. Hersic]] of Bedford College, University of London and Prof. [[Raymond Thomas]] of the University of Bath. According to Richard Cockett 'the report claimed to be a comprehensive exposure of those politically motivated Trotskist of Communist-linked trade unionists within the trade union movement, who, under cover of legitimate industrial action, sought to create a revolutionary situation.  the ISC thus drew some grave conclusions about the threat to democracy in Britain:
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
As Cockett notes: 'Not surprisingly, given that this Report appeared at the time of the 1974 miners' strike, it attracted widespread publicity and the Observer, for instance, published Section 8 of the Report on 'Militant extremism and political subversion' in full.{{ref|1}}
 
As Cockett notes: 'Not surprisingly, given that this Report appeared at the time of the 1974 miners' strike, it attracted widespread publicity and the Observer, for instance, published Section 8 of the Report on 'Militant extremism and political subversion' in full.{{ref|1}}
 +
 +
==Publications==
 +
[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0007-1315(197006)21%3A2%3C238%3AIRCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7 Review: Industrial Relations: Contemporary Issues by B. C. Roberts] Review author[s]: A. J. M. Sykes ''The British Journal of Sociology'', Vol. 21, No. 2 (Jun., 1970), pp. 238-239 doi:10.2307/588425
 +
A. J. M. Sykes (1970) [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x Myth in Communication] Journal of Communication 20 (1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x
 +
A. J. M. Sykes [http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/29/11/1083 Overtime, False Returns, and Restrictive Practices: The Perception of an Industrial Pay System] ''Human Relations'', Vol. 29, No. 11, 1083-1101 (1976) DOI: 10.1177/001872677602901106
 +
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
#{{note|3}} University of Strathclyde [http://www.mis.strath.ac.uk/Secretariat/Publications/general/publications/Part1.pdf University of Strathclyde Calendar 2006-07 Part 1 Staff Lists and General Regulations]
 
#{{note|3}} University of Strathclyde [http://www.mis.strath.ac.uk/Secretariat/Publications/general/publications/Part1.pdf University of Strathclyde Calendar 2006-07 Part 1 Staff Lists and General Regulations]
 +
#{{note|4}} A. J. M. Sykes (1970) [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x Myth in Communication] Journal of Communication 20 (1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x
 
#{{note|2}} Institute for the Study of Conflict, ''Sources of Conflict in British Industry'', ISC, 1974, p. 26.
 
#{{note|2}} Institute for the Study of Conflict, ''Sources of Conflict in British Industry'', ISC, 1974, p. 26.
 
#{{note|1}} Richard Cockett, ''Thinking the Unthinkable'', London: Harper Collins, 1994, p. 223-4.
 
#{{note|1}} Richard Cockett, ''Thinking the Unthinkable'', London: Harper Collins, 1994, p. 223-4.

Revision as of 09:25, 26 March 2007

Andrew J M Sykes was Professor of Sociology at the University of Strahclyde from 1967 - 1989.[1] According to a biographical note: 'He received his doctorate in industrial sociology from Glasgow University. He taught Management Studies at Scottish College of Commerce for three years and then joined the staff at the University of Strathclyde in 1963. Professor Sykes has conducted research into social relations and attitude changes in printing, civil engineering, clerical employment, motor car assembling, social change in Ireland, industrial training and shipping.'[2]

In 1974 Sykes was a member of a Study Group set up by the Institute for the Study of Conflict which published a report in february of that year tiotled 'Sources of conflict in British Industry'. Other members of the Study Group were Ken Watkins, Brian Crozier, Prof. A. R. Hersic of Bedford College, University of London and Prof. Raymond Thomas of the University of Bath. According to Richard Cockett 'the report claimed to be a comprehensive exposure of those politically motivated Trotskist of Communist-linked trade unionists within the trade union movement, who, under cover of legitimate industrial action, sought to create a revolutionary situation. the ISC thus drew some grave conclusions about the threat to democracy in Britain:

There can be no reasonable doubt that in several major British industries members of the Communist Party and other left wing organisations exert substantial influence in provoking and exacerbating conflict... Any serious study of the available evidence does more than indicate that a deliberate effort of considerable magnitude is being staged to disrupt industry for political ends; it shows that growing extremist organisations exist in some British Trade Unions capable of exerting influence wholly disproportionate to the numbers involved. It also shows that the aims of the extremist organisations are incompaticle with any normally-accepted concepts of democracy in Britain.[3]

As Cockett notes: 'Not surprisingly, given that this Report appeared at the time of the 1974 miners' strike, it attracted widespread publicity and the Observer, for instance, published Section 8 of the Report on 'Militant extremism and political subversion' in full.[4]

Publications

Review: Industrial Relations: Contemporary Issues by B. C. Roberts Review author[s]: A. J. M. Sykes The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Jun., 1970), pp. 238-239 doi:10.2307/588425 A. J. M. Sykes (1970) Myth in Communication Journal of Communication 20 (1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x A. J. M. Sykes Overtime, False Returns, and Restrictive Practices: The Perception of an Industrial Pay System Human Relations, Vol. 29, No. 11, 1083-1101 (1976) DOI: 10.1177/001872677602901106


Notes

  1. ^ University of Strathclyde University of Strathclyde Calendar 2006-07 Part 1 Staff Lists and General Regulations
  2. ^ A. J. M. Sykes (1970) Myth in Communication Journal of Communication 20 (1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00861.x
  3. ^ Institute for the Study of Conflict, Sources of Conflict in British Industry, ISC, 1974, p. 26.
  4. ^ Richard Cockett, Thinking the Unthinkable, London: Harper Collins, 1994, p. 223-4.