Difference between revisions of "User talk:Paul"
m (oop wrong page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Hi Paul, | Hi Paul, | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
Note that Norman Solomon was invited and spoke very forcefully against the LM line accusing them more or less of being provacateurs when they criticised the anti war movement - comparing them to similar elements int he anti vietnam war movement. I was at the conference and can brief you more about this. Norman's role there was wholly positive in my view... | Note that Norman Solomon was invited and spoke very forcefully against the LM line accusing them more or less of being provacateurs when they criticised the anti war movement - comparing them to similar elements int he anti vietnam war movement. I was at the conference and can brief you more about this. Norman's role there was wholly positive in my view... | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 13:03, 4 Feb 2007 (GMT) | --[[User:David|David]] 13:03, 4 Feb 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, yes I think puttig in the references strengthens it. Is that possible? | ||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 13:09, 13 Feb 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 13:09, 13 February 2007
Hi Paul,
I think we could do with changing the useful fools category. Idrees has a category on journalists. Maybe you could agree between you what to call this?
--David 10:05, 31 Jan 2007 (GMT)
Paul,
more on the communicating Terror conference here: http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Bill_Durodi%C3%A9 Note that Norman Solomon was invited and spoke very forcefully against the LM line accusing them more or less of being provacateurs when they criticised the anti war movement - comparing them to similar elements int he anti vietnam war movement. I was at the conference and can brief you more about this. Norman's role there was wholly positive in my view... --David 13:03, 4 Feb 2007 (GMT)
Hi, yes I think puttig in the references strengthens it. Is that possible?
--David 13:09, 13 Feb 2007 (GMT)
