Difference between revisions of "Malcolm Wicks"
m |
m (past tense/headings style) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Image:Wicks_pic.jpg|right|thumb|Malcolm Wicks MP at the Nuclear Industry Association stand, 2005 Labour Conference]] | [[Image:Wicks_pic.jpg|right|thumb|Malcolm Wicks MP at the Nuclear Industry Association stand, 2005 Labour Conference]] | ||
− | Malcolm Wicks was a British Labour Party politician from 1992 until his death in September 2012. | + | '''Malcolm Wicks''' was a British Labour Party politician from 1992 until his death in September 2012. |
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
He continued: "The Review will explore all the options open to us taking into account the important international context. There will inevitably be some difficult decisions and trade offs to be made in arriving at the right package of policy proposals. It is crucial that we stimulate a wide-ranging and informed debate and engage the public, business and industry throughout the process as well as academic, private sector, scientific, NGO and other experts".<ref>Department of Trade and Industry, [http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/energy_review_press_notice.pdf ''Energy Review - A Secure and Clean Energy Future''], Press Release, November 29.</ref> | He continued: "The Review will explore all the options open to us taking into account the important international context. There will inevitably be some difficult decisions and trade offs to be made in arriving at the right package of policy proposals. It is crucial that we stimulate a wide-ranging and informed debate and engage the public, business and industry throughout the process as well as academic, private sector, scientific, NGO and other experts".<ref>Department of Trade and Industry, [http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/energy_review_press_notice.pdf ''Energy Review - A Secure and Clean Energy Future''], Press Release, November 29.</ref> | ||
− | ==How | + | ==How neutral on nuclear?== |
− | + | Wicks quietly pleased the nuclear industry with his positive comments over nuclear energy, whilst attacking anti-nuclear activists. At a fringe meeting at the Labour party Conference in 2005, Wicks spoke at a meeting organised by the [[Nuclear Industry Association]] (NIA). According to the NIA, Wicks "indicated again the commitment of the Government to ensure nuclear energy would be considered as part of this process".<ref>Nuclear Industry Association [http://www.niauk.org/industrylink/article_134.shtml "Energy Tops the Agenda at the Party Conferences"] Newsletter, Issue 10, October/November, 2005.</ref> | |
− | In February 2006, ''The Guardian'' reported how, although | + | In February 2006, ''The Guardian'' reported how, although Wicks was supposedly "neutral" about nuclear power, he "just can't help himself slagging off anyone who argues that Britain can do without it. Last week he was talking to the Scottish press about Germany's plans to shut down its nuclear plants. 'I would at least hope that the environmental fundamentalists would ... think through the implications', he said. Asked to identify those 'fundamentalists, he said: 'I mean people who are so committed to the environmental agenda but who imagine that the answer can be windmills and some tidal power and some solar power and some recycling.' Wicks's balanced energy review will be presented to Tony Blair in the summer." |
''The Guardian'' continued: "In the meantime, perhaps Wicks could inform the public about the mysterious public consultations that the Department of Trade and Industry is supposed to be holding on the energy review. So far there have been no announcements, no postings on the website and no reporting of what was said by whom to whom".<ref>John Vidal, [http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,,1719845,00.html Eco Soundings], ''The Guardian'', March 1, 2006, Society, page8.</ref> | ''The Guardian'' continued: "In the meantime, perhaps Wicks could inform the public about the mysterious public consultations that the Department of Trade and Industry is supposed to be holding on the energy review. So far there have been no announcements, no postings on the website and no reporting of what was said by whom to whom".<ref>John Vidal, [http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,,1719845,00.html Eco Soundings], ''The Guardian'', March 1, 2006, Society, page8.</ref> | ||
− | ==A | + | ==A clean source of power?== |
During his February 2006 Scottish visit, Wicks also said: "Our paramount concern (is) to have an energy supply which is clean, and nuclear is a clean source of energy." In response, the Scottish National Party and the Scottish Greens accused Wicks of "hysterics" and of spinning a pro-nuclear line from London.<ref>BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4743226.stm Fury at Nuclear Debate Comments], February 23, 2006.</ref> | During his February 2006 Scottish visit, Wicks also said: "Our paramount concern (is) to have an energy supply which is clean, and nuclear is a clean source of energy." In response, the Scottish National Party and the Scottish Greens accused Wicks of "hysterics" and of spinning a pro-nuclear line from London.<ref>BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4743226.stm Fury at Nuclear Debate Comments], February 23, 2006.</ref> | ||
− | ==A | + | ==A lethal legacy== |
− | Just months before Wicks said nuclear was clean he was said to be shocked at the way nuclear waste had been handled and stored. Quoted in the New Stateman he said: "I think it is an absolute disgrace that the industry, governments, parliaments have not confronted this legacy before. There is a huge irresponsibility which a lot of people should take responsibility for, by which I mean governments of different political hues over several decades."<ref>Jonanthan Leake, [http://www.newstatesman.com/200510030059 "Interview - Malcolm Wicks"], ''New Statesman'', October 3, 2005</ref> | + | Just months before Wicks said nuclear was clean, he was said to be shocked at the way nuclear waste had been handled and stored. Quoted in the ''New Stateman'' he said: "I think it is an absolute disgrace that the industry, governments, parliaments have not confronted this legacy before. There is a huge irresponsibility which a lot of people should take responsibility for, by which I mean governments of different political hues over several decades."<ref>Jonanthan Leake, [http://www.newstatesman.com/200510030059 "Interview - Malcolm Wicks"], ''New Statesman'', October 3, 2005</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
[[Category:British Politician|Wicks, Malcolm]] | [[Category:British Politician|Wicks, Malcolm]] | ||
− | |||
[[Category:MP|Wicks, Malcolm]] | [[Category:MP|Wicks, Malcolm]] | ||
[[Category: Nuclear Spin|Wicks, Malcolm]] | [[Category: Nuclear Spin|Wicks, Malcolm]] | ||
[[Category:Individuals linked to the push for nuclear|Wicks, Malcolm]] | [[Category:Individuals linked to the push for nuclear|Wicks, Malcolm]] |
Revision as of 23:27, 22 October 2012
This article is part of the Nuclear Spin project of Spinwatch. |
Malcolm Wicks was a British Labour Party politician from 1992 until his death in September 2012.
Contents
Background
Wicks was the Member of Parliament in north Croydon from 1992, first representing Croydon North-West and then representing Croydon North from 1997. In 1999 Tony Blair appointed him a junior Minister in the Department for Education & Employment. In July 2001 he moved to the Department for Work and Pensions where he was promoted in 2003 to Minister of State for Pensions. Following the last General Election he was appointed Minister for Energy in the Department for Trade and Industry.[1]
Led the Energy Review
As the Minister for Energy, Wicks led the Energy Review announced in November 2005. According to Wicks: "The Energy Review is taking place against a background of strengthening evidence on the nature and extent of climate change and increasing concerns about the future security of UK energy supplies. This is the right moment to assess where we are in relation to achieving the goals set out in the 2003 Energy White Paper".
He continued: "The Review will explore all the options open to us taking into account the important international context. There will inevitably be some difficult decisions and trade offs to be made in arriving at the right package of policy proposals. It is crucial that we stimulate a wide-ranging and informed debate and engage the public, business and industry throughout the process as well as academic, private sector, scientific, NGO and other experts".[2]
How neutral on nuclear?
Wicks quietly pleased the nuclear industry with his positive comments over nuclear energy, whilst attacking anti-nuclear activists. At a fringe meeting at the Labour party Conference in 2005, Wicks spoke at a meeting organised by the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA). According to the NIA, Wicks "indicated again the commitment of the Government to ensure nuclear energy would be considered as part of this process".[3]
In February 2006, The Guardian reported how, although Wicks was supposedly "neutral" about nuclear power, he "just can't help himself slagging off anyone who argues that Britain can do without it. Last week he was talking to the Scottish press about Germany's plans to shut down its nuclear plants. 'I would at least hope that the environmental fundamentalists would ... think through the implications', he said. Asked to identify those 'fundamentalists, he said: 'I mean people who are so committed to the environmental agenda but who imagine that the answer can be windmills and some tidal power and some solar power and some recycling.' Wicks's balanced energy review will be presented to Tony Blair in the summer."
The Guardian continued: "In the meantime, perhaps Wicks could inform the public about the mysterious public consultations that the Department of Trade and Industry is supposed to be holding on the energy review. So far there have been no announcements, no postings on the website and no reporting of what was said by whom to whom".[4]
A clean source of power?
During his February 2006 Scottish visit, Wicks also said: "Our paramount concern (is) to have an energy supply which is clean, and nuclear is a clean source of energy." In response, the Scottish National Party and the Scottish Greens accused Wicks of "hysterics" and of spinning a pro-nuclear line from London.[5]
A lethal legacy
Just months before Wicks said nuclear was clean, he was said to be shocked at the way nuclear waste had been handled and stored. Quoted in the New Stateman he said: "I think it is an absolute disgrace that the industry, governments, parliaments have not confronted this legacy before. There is a huge irresponsibility which a lot of people should take responsibility for, by which I mean governments of different political hues over several decades."[6]
References
- ↑ Malcolm Wick's website
- ↑ Department of Trade and Industry, Energy Review - A Secure and Clean Energy Future, Press Release, November 29.
- ↑ Nuclear Industry Association "Energy Tops the Agenda at the Party Conferences" Newsletter, Issue 10, October/November, 2005.
- ↑ John Vidal, Eco Soundings, The Guardian, March 1, 2006, Society, page8.
- ↑ BBC News, Fury at Nuclear Debate Comments, February 23, 2006.
- ↑ Jonanthan Leake, "Interview - Malcolm Wicks", New Statesman, October 3, 2005