|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Hi,
| |
| | | | |
| − | can you use the footnote format for the Pacific legal foundation etc?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ie:
| |
| − | quote {{ref|refid}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Notes==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # {{note|refid}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | --[[User:David|David]] 21:18, 18 Jul 2006 (BST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Any chance you can tidy up the Conservative Friends of israel page and add a sentence at the beginning?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | --[[User:David|David]] 22:42, 28 Jul 2006 (BST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Not sure what you mean about dead links and summarising? No need to summarise the profiles at the moment . I think just get them up fo just now and tidy up the other corprate wones
| |
| − | --[[User:David|David]] 09:24, 29 Jul 2006 (BST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hi, can you use the referencing format on the campus watch page?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | --[[User:David|David]] 16:22, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == superfluous ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | >>Unless there is something in the biography that is particularly revealing, reproducing extended biographies defeats the whole purpose of having a profile. The idea should be to provide condensed factual information that highlights possible conflicts of interests.<<
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hmmm: but there is so little info on Lappen, that the little officially recognized info is worth putting in Spin* -- especially since this type of info is volatile -- i.e., in a few weeks you will see that it is either changed or removed (very common)... as such, keeping the record of these things is valuable.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | >>The bios on Lappen & Vallely are in my view mostly superfluous.<<
| |
| − | The Vallely one? There virtually no info there -- and again the official record of the bio is useful... About Lappen... I eliminated a bit, but the experience at SW* with this bio indicated that the only things that remain are those that are sourced
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | >>
| |
| − | Secondly, on the Palast profile, I think you can summarize the nature of his attack on Gallowy without editorializing on Galloways stance on the war<<
| |
| − | Well, on the one hand you want me to summarize things, and on the other you call my summaries "editorializing". Make up your mind.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''And''': FEEL FREE TO EDIT THE ARTICLES YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOU CAN IMPROVE THEM. I would not be offended if you did that.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == ordering hacks ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hi
| |
| − | When adding hack names to [[Hack Watch]] it's worthwhile ordering them alphabetically
| |
| − | ::)
| |
| − | --[[User:David|David]] 20:37, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT)
| |
