Invisible college

The Invisible College refers to both a historical institution (Invisible College (organisation)) and a sociological concept. This page focuses on the concept and its history, usage and utility.

Bibliography

A compilation of work on the concept of the invisible college. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B. & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54, 550-560.

• Bartle, R. G. (1995). A brief history of the mathematical literature. Publishing Research Quarterly, 11, 3-9.
• Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping the intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 444-452.
• Beaver, D. de B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65-84.
• Beaver, D. de B., & Rosen, R. (1979a). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co- authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830. Scientometrics, 1, 133-149.
• Beaver, D. de B., & Rosen, R. (1979b). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 231-245.
• Brunn, S. D. & O'Lear, S. R. (1999). Research and communication in the "invisible college" of the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Global Environmental Change, 9, 285-301.
• Braham, S. (1995). Advanced collaboration via the web. Retrieved September 23, 1999 from: http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/organics/vault/net/node5.html.
• Brunn, S. D. & O'Lear, S. R. (1999). Research and communication in the "invisible college" of the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Global Environmental Change, 9, 285-301.
• Chubin, D. (1976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. The Sociological Quarterly, 17, 448-476.
• Chubin, D. E. (1985). Beyond invisible colleges: inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 221-254.
• Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the "invisible college" hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352.
• Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Crane, D. (1980). Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the "invisible college" hypothesis. In B. C. Griffith (Ed.), Key Papers in Information Science (pp. 10-27). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc.
• Crawford, S. (1971). Informal communication among scientists in sleep research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22, 301-310.
• Cronin, B. (1982). Invisible colleges and information transfer: a review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 38, 212-236.
• Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar’s courtesy: The role of acknowledgements in the primary communication process. Los Angeles, CA: Taylor Graham Publishing.
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author cocitation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25, 67-78.
• European Singularities Network. (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2002, from: http://www.home.imf.au.dk/esn/.
• Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences. Annual Report 2000-2001. (2001). Cambridge, U. K.: Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
• Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences. (2003). Retrieved July 5, 2003 from: http://www.newton.cam.ac.uk.
• Fisher, C. S. (1967). The last invariant theorists. European Journal of Sociology, 8, 216-244.
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Chicago, IL: Polity Press.
• Griffith, B. C., & Mullins, N. C. (1980). Coherent social groups in scientific change. In B. C. Griffith (Ed.), Key papers in information science (pp. 52-57). White Plains, New York: Knowledge Industry Publications.
• Hagstrom, W. O. (1970). Factors related to the use of different modes of publishing research in four scientific fields. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
• Kadushin, C. (1966). The friends and supporters of psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life. American Sociological Review, 31, 786-802.
• Karki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author cocitation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22, 323-34.
• Kinsella, W. J. (1998). Communication and the construction of knowledge in a scientific community: an interpretive study of the Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 115-140). London: Sage.
• Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1752-1774.
• Krackhardt, D., Blythe, J., & McGrath, C. (1995). Krackplot 3.0 User's Manual. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.
• Kraut, R., Galegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaborations. In I. Greif (Ed.), Computer supported co-operative work: a book of readings (pp. 741-769). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
• Kretschmer, H. (1997). Patterns of behaviour in co-authorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 40, 579-591.
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts (Revised ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Laudel, G. (2001). What do we measure by co-authorships? In M. Davis & C. S. Wilson (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 369-384). Sydney, Australia: Bibliometrics & Informetrics Research Group.
• Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Lievrouw, L. A., & Carley, K. (1990). Changing patterns of communication among scientists in an era of ‘telescience.’ Technology in Society, 12, 457-477.
• Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
• Lingwood, D. A. (1969). Interpersonal communication, research productivity and invisible colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
• Matzat, U. (2004). Academic Communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of Information or Creation of Social Contacts? Social Networks, 26 (3), 221-255.
• McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American society for information science, 41, 433-443.
• Merton, R. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22, 635-659.
• Merz, M. (1998). 'Nobody can force you when you are across the ocean' - Face to face and e-mail exchanges between theoretical physicists. In C. Smith & J. Agar (Eds.), Making space for science. Territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge (pp. 313-329). London: Macmillan.
• Mulkay, M. J., Gilbert, G. N., & Woolgar, S. (1975). Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology, 9, 187-203.
• Paisley, W. J. (Ed.). (1968). Information needs and uses. (Vol. 3). Chicago: American Society for Information Science and Encyclopedia Britannica.
• Perry, C. A., & Rice, R. E. (1998). Scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: influence of network structure on change in a hybrid problem area. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 151-168.
• Perry, C. A., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Network influences on involvement in the hybrid problem area of developmental dyslexia. Science Communication, 21(1), 38-74.
• Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Price, D. J. de Solla. (1971). Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22, 74-75.
• Price, D. J. de Solla. (1986). Little science, big science ... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Rousseau, R. & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author cocitations: Definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 513-529.
• Sandstrom, P. E. (1998). Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology: an author cocitation analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
• Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, vol.10 (pp. 217-255). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
• Tuire, P. & Erno, P. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.
• Van Rossum, W. (1973). Informal communication and the development of scientific fields. Social Science Information,12, 63-75.
• White, H. D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson’s r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1250-1259.
• White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: an author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-55.
• White, H. D., Wellman, B. & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 111-126.
• Zuccala, A. (2004). Revisiting the invisible college: a case study of the intellectual structure and social process of Singularity Theory research in mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.