Difference between revisions of "Adam Burgess"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[Adam Burgess]] is | + | [[Adam Burgess]] is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental [[LM]] network. He has written for [[Spiked]]<ref>[http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CADC3.htm Accounting for the panic] Spiked website acc 29 Oct 2011</ref>, is married to another member of the network, [[Tracey Brown]], and has spoken at the [[London Legal Salon]]. <ref>[http://londonlegalsalon.blogspot.com/ At 1930 on Monday the 24th of October 2011 Adam Burgess will introduce a discussion on Public Inquiries at the Perseverance, on Lamb's Conduit Street in Holborn] London Legal Salon blog acc 29 Oct 2011</ref] |
Burgess is a senior lecturer in Sociology at the University of Kent in the same department as the network guru [[Frank Furedi]]. Burgess neglects to mention any of the elements of the network on his page on the University of Kent Website.<ref>University of Kent [http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/burgess.htm Staff | Dr Adam Burgess], accessed February 2007</ref> His work on risk and mobile phones - taking the line that there is no risk - has been featured on Spiked online. This formed part of a 'debate' on 'Mobile Society' sponsored by [[O2]] the mobile phone network.<ref> Adam Burgess [http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CADC3.htm Accounting for the panic] Spiked Online, [19-Oct-2005] The mobile phone scare is a lesson in how journalists and policymakers should not react to concerns about a new technology.</ref> | Burgess is a senior lecturer in Sociology at the University of Kent in the same department as the network guru [[Frank Furedi]]. Burgess neglects to mention any of the elements of the network on his page on the University of Kent Website.<ref>University of Kent [http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/burgess.htm Staff | Dr Adam Burgess], accessed February 2007</ref> His work on risk and mobile phones - taking the line that there is no risk - has been featured on Spiked online. This formed part of a 'debate' on 'Mobile Society' sponsored by [[O2]] the mobile phone network.<ref> Adam Burgess [http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CADC3.htm Accounting for the panic] Spiked Online, [19-Oct-2005] The mobile phone scare is a lesson in how journalists and policymakers should not react to concerns about a new technology.</ref> | ||
+ | ==Contact== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Staff profile: [http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/academic/burgess.html Adam Burgess] | ||
==Publications== | ==Publications== | ||
[https://catalogue.kent.ac.uk/Record/524977 The contemporary emergence of health concerns related to mobile phones : a study of the origins and diffusion of mobile phone fears and anti-EMF campaigns by Burgess, Adam. Published 2001] University of Kent website, acc 10 Jan 2011 | [https://catalogue.kent.ac.uk/Record/524977 The contemporary emergence of health concerns related to mobile phones : a study of the origins and diffusion of mobile phone fears and anti-EMF campaigns by Burgess, Adam. Published 2001] University of Kent website, acc 10 Jan 2011 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== |
Revision as of 17:58, 29 October 2011
Adam Burgess is associated with the libertarian anti-environmental LM network. He has written for Spiked[1], is married to another member of the network, Tracey Brown, and has spoken at the London Legal Salon. Cite error: Closing </ref>
missing for <ref>
tag His work on risk and mobile phones - taking the line that there is no risk - has been featured on Spiked online. This formed part of a 'debate' on 'Mobile Society' sponsored by O2 the mobile phone network.[2]
Contact
- Staff profile: Adam Burgess
Publications
The contemporary emergence of health concerns related to mobile phones : a study of the origins and diffusion of mobile phone fears and anti-EMF campaigns by Burgess, Adam. Published 2001 University of Kent website, acc 10 Jan 2011
Notes
- ↑ Accounting for the panic Spiked website acc 29 Oct 2011
- ↑ Adam Burgess Accounting for the panic Spiked Online, [19-Oct-2005] The mobile phone scare is a lesson in how journalists and policymakers should not react to concerns about a new technology.