Difference between revisions of "Talk:Editorial Intelligence"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
well this has been changed quite a bit I wonder if it could be explained to me please. | well this has been changed quite a bit I wonder if it could be explained to me please. | ||
I don't really think whoever changed it really has improved it and when there is so much to be done here what's the point: I think the plan to section it off as some sort of 'polemic' seemed a better idea — I just don't trust the editting that's being done here — seems tendentious to me: do i have to go about re-instating bits, can't I be consulted first? | I don't really think whoever changed it really has improved it and when there is so much to be done here what's the point: I think the plan to section it off as some sort of 'polemic' seemed a better idea — I just don't trust the editting that's being done here — seems tendentious to me: do i have to go about re-instating bits, can't I be consulted first? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best leave this to me I think — I'm quite open to suggestions on how to possibly change it and also if we are to publish it as a pamphlet I'm releuctant to name another author! | ||
Revision as of 18:55, 14 September 2006
well this has been changed quite a bit I wonder if it could be explained to me please. I don't really think whoever changed it really has improved it and when there is so much to be done here what's the point: I think the plan to section it off as some sort of 'polemic' seemed a better idea — I just don't trust the editting that's being done here — seems tendentious to me: do i have to go about re-instating bits, can't I be consulted first?
Best leave this to me I think — I'm quite open to suggestions on how to possibly change it and also if we are to publish it as a pamphlet I'm releuctant to name another author!
