Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:Atlantic Partnership: Atlanticism and it's Critics"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In order to recover ground with the United States the EU is suggesting improving transatlantic relations further than the traditional Atlanticism one to one that is more orientated around results and lead by tactical precedence, such as the Atlantic Partnership.<ref>"[http://www.euractiv.com/en/priorities/eu-wants-new-atlanticism-news-391583 EU wants a new Atlanticism]" EurActiv. Accessed 16 November, 2010.</ref> | In order to recover ground with the United States the EU is suggesting improving transatlantic relations further than the traditional Atlanticism one to one that is more orientated around results and lead by tactical precedence, such as the Atlantic Partnership.<ref>"[http://www.euractiv.com/en/priorities/eu-wants-new-atlanticism-news-391583 EU wants a new Atlanticism]" EurActiv. Accessed 16 November, 2010.</ref> | ||
| − | In the 21st century, Atlanticism has undergone important adjustments due to terrorism and the war in Iraq, the main consequence being a new inquiring of the idea itself and a new insight that the security of the particular countries quite possibly need alliance action outwith the North Atlantic terrain. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, NATO, for the first time invoked Article 5, stating that any attack facilitated on a member country will be seen as an attack on the entire group of members.<ref> | + | In the 21st century, Atlanticism has undergone important adjustments due to terrorism and the war in Iraq, the main consequence being a new inquiring of the idea itself and a new insight that the security of the particular countries quite possibly need alliance action outwith the North Atlantic terrain. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, NATO, for the first time invoked Article 5, stating that any attack facilitated on a member country will be seen as an attack on the entire group of members.<ref>[http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2001/p01-124e.htm Statement by the North Atlantic Council]" NATO. Accessed 15 November, 2010.</ref> |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 17 November 2010
Atlanticism
Atlanticism became the foundation of British foreign and security policy for the duration of the Cold War. The uniqueness of being a trustworthy ally in the circumstance of a hostile international system produced a union of interests across a variety of security and defence issues. Following the tragedy of 9/11, international relations imply a very dissimilar context. Conscious of its principal position in the unipolar order, the “imperial public” has verified that it is not satisfied to act as a status quo power.[1]
In order to recover ground with the United States the EU is suggesting improving transatlantic relations further than the traditional Atlanticism one to one that is more orientated around results and lead by tactical precedence, such as the Atlantic Partnership.[2]
In the 21st century, Atlanticism has undergone important adjustments due to terrorism and the war in Iraq, the main consequence being a new inquiring of the idea itself and a new insight that the security of the particular countries quite possibly need alliance action outwith the North Atlantic terrain. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, NATO, for the first time invoked Article 5, stating that any attack facilitated on a member country will be seen as an attack on the entire group of members.[3]
Notes
- ↑ ""FIghting For Values": Atlanticism, Internationalism and the Blair Doctrine" allacademic research. Accessed 15 November, 2010.
- ↑ "EU wants a new Atlanticism" EurActiv. Accessed 16 November, 2010.
- ↑ Statement by the North Atlantic Council" NATO. Accessed 15 November, 2010.
