Difference between revisions of "Globalisation:Global Warming Policy Foundation: Criticisms"
Jenna Leslie (talk | contribs) (New page: The Global Warming Policy Foundation has received much support in the past year, however it has also received much criticism. David Aaronovitch, a British journalist, wrote in The Times ...) |
Jenna Leslie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Global Warming Policy Foundation has received much support in the past year, however it has also received much criticism. | The Global Warming Policy Foundation has received much support in the past year, however it has also received much criticism. | ||
| − | David Aaronovitch, a British journalist, wrote in The Times on 24 November that “Lord Lawson’s acceptance of the science turns out, on close scrutiny, to be considerably less than half-hearted. Thus he speaks of “the (present) majority scientific view”. He goes on to say that “people like Lord Lawson” are not sceptical about climate change and are only sceptical about “what they don’t want to be true” | + | David Aaronovitch, a British journalist, wrote in The Times on 24 November that “Lord Lawson’s acceptance of the science turns out, on close scrutiny, to be considerably less than half-hearted. Thus he speaks of “the (present) majority scientific view”. He goes on to say that “people like Lord Lawson” are not sceptical about climate change and are only sceptical about “what they don’t want to be true”.<ref>The Times "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/david_aaronovitch/article6928868.ece Strip Away the Figleaf and Reveal Naysayers]" accessed 10.11.10</ref> David Aaronvitch is claiming that Lord Lawson and his colleagues are claiming that there is no issue with climate change as this is what they would like to believe. |
Revision as of 19:36, 11 November 2010
The Global Warming Policy Foundation has received much support in the past year, however it has also received much criticism.
David Aaronovitch, a British journalist, wrote in The Times on 24 November that “Lord Lawson’s acceptance of the science turns out, on close scrutiny, to be considerably less than half-hearted. Thus he speaks of “the (present) majority scientific view”. He goes on to say that “people like Lord Lawson” are not sceptical about climate change and are only sceptical about “what they don’t want to be true”.[1] David Aaronvitch is claiming that Lord Lawson and his colleagues are claiming that there is no issue with climate change as this is what they would like to believe.
- ↑ The Times "Strip Away the Figleaf and Reveal Naysayers" accessed 10.11.10
