Difference between revisions of "John Sweeney"
(New page: John Sweeney is a journalist who works for the BBC current affairs programme Panorama.<ref>John Sweeney, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/panorama/johnsweeney/ John Sweeney's Blog], BBC, Ac...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
John Sweeney is a journalist who works for the BBC current affairs programme [[Panorama]].<ref>John Sweeney, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/panorama/johnsweeney/ John Sweeney's Blog], BBC, Accessed 10-July-2010</ref> | John Sweeney is a journalist who works for the BBC current affairs programme [[Panorama]].<ref>John Sweeney, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/panorama/johnsweeney/ John Sweeney's Blog], BBC, Accessed 10-July-2010</ref> | ||
| + | ==Depleted Uranium Debate== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Writing in [[The Spectator]] in June 2003, John Sweeney launched a scathing attack on John Pilger for arguing that birth defects in Iraq had been caused by depleted uranium weaponry deployed during the first gulf war. Sweeny argued that: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :"None of the cancers and birth defects that Pilger's researcher dates back to 1992 can be the fault of depleted uranium. To omit the possibility that some of the cancers were caused by Saddam's chemical weapons is to misrepresent the facts. To imply by that omission that depleted uranium is solely responsible for the cancers and birth defects in Iraq as he does in his book, his film and in the Daily Mirror is a disgrace to journalism. I accuse John Pilger of cheating the public and favouring a dictator".<ref>John Sweeney, [http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/11261/part_4/the-first-casualty-of-pilger.thtml The first casualty of Pilger...], ''The Spectator'', 28-June-2003, Accessed 10-July-2010</ref> | ||
| + | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 23:59, 10 July 2010
John Sweeney is a journalist who works for the BBC current affairs programme Panorama.[1]
Depleted Uranium Debate
Writing in The Spectator in June 2003, John Sweeney launched a scathing attack on John Pilger for arguing that birth defects in Iraq had been caused by depleted uranium weaponry deployed during the first gulf war. Sweeny argued that:
- "None of the cancers and birth defects that Pilger's researcher dates back to 1992 can be the fault of depleted uranium. To omit the possibility that some of the cancers were caused by Saddam's chemical weapons is to misrepresent the facts. To imply by that omission that depleted uranium is solely responsible for the cancers and birth defects in Iraq as he does in his book, his film and in the Daily Mirror is a disgrace to journalism. I accuse John Pilger of cheating the public and favouring a dictator".[2]
Notes
- ↑ John Sweeney, John Sweeney's Blog, BBC, Accessed 10-July-2010
- ↑ John Sweeney, The first casualty of Pilger..., The Spectator, 28-June-2003, Accessed 10-July-2010
