Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Shrimpton"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
It would be interesting to compare his opinion of the guilt of Saddam Hussein (as head of state and thus guilty) to Pinochet (as head of state and thus not guilty). -- | It would be interesting to compare his opinion of the guilt of Saddam Hussein (as head of state and thus guilty) to Pinochet (as head of state and thus not guilty). -- | ||
I do not understand this so have deleted it, but if you want to clarify it, pls reinstate. | I do not understand this so have deleted it, but if you want to clarify it, pls reinstate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In general, it's really good. | ||
[[User:Claire|Claire]] | [[User:Claire|Claire]] | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 1 October 2008
Para beginning The main sponsors of these vigilantes were --
do you have a source for the fact that these orgs were sponsors? Pls include a ref to this source.
competing conspiracy theories -- can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context.
Ilana Freedman is Managing Partner of GGI. Other partners include Lt. Colonel Gordon Cucullu, Intelligence Director with GGI (and Benador). -- I've edited this sentences as a hanging "others" was unclear. Is it correct -- is the lt colonel a partner?
It would be interesting to compare his opinion of the guilt of Saddam Hussein (as head of state and thus guilty) to Pinochet (as head of state and thus not guilty). -- I do not understand this so have deleted it, but if you want to clarify it, pls reinstate.
In general, it's really good. Claire
I seen old Shrimpo on Sky news' round up of the press and thought I'd have a go — you'll prob. want to section off the summit stuff but i thought I'd keep going with it and bang down as much as poss while I'm in the mood: feel free to monkey around with it - its all a first draft as such
Looks good. REmember that links to new pages need link and not [link] which seems to affect thispage strangely?
--David 14:04, 5 December 2007 (GMT)
