Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Shrimpton"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
competing conspiracy theories -- | competing conspiracy theories -- | ||
can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context. | can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ilana Freedman is Managing Partner of GGI. Other partners include Lt. Colonel Gordon Cucullu, Intelligence Director with GGI (and Benador). -- | ||
| + | I've edited this sentences as a hanging "others" was unclear. Is it correct -- is the lt colonel a partner? | ||
[[User:Claire|Claire]] | [[User:Claire|Claire]] | ||
Revision as of 09:23, 1 October 2008
Para beginning The main sponsors of these vigilantes were --
do you have a source for the fact that these orgs were sponsors? Pls include a ref to this source.
competing conspiracy theories -- can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context.
Ilana Freedman is Managing Partner of GGI. Other partners include Lt. Colonel Gordon Cucullu, Intelligence Director with GGI (and Benador). -- I've edited this sentences as a hanging "others" was unclear. Is it correct -- is the lt colonel a partner? Claire
I seen old Shrimpo on Sky news' round up of the press and thought I'd have a go — you'll prob. want to section off the summit stuff but i thought I'd keep going with it and bang down as much as poss while I'm in the mood: feel free to monkey around with it - its all a first draft as such
Looks good. REmember that links to new pages need link and not [link] which seems to affect thispage strangely?
--David 14:04, 5 December 2007 (GMT)
