Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Kampfner"
m (article needs a major rewrite) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Paul|Paulo]] | [[User:Paul|Paulo]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | yes, it's ok. but let's all be careful about criticising each others work. This page certainly needed work and you have contributed to that. I think we need to try and adopt an approach which encourages people to contributs and where we are all respectful of each others contributions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:David|David]] 15:14, 2 September 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 2 September 2007
The article needs to be rewritten in toto... it is basically a poorly written jab at Kampfner... not all well documented. Even the first few paragraph lack cohesion or logic...
I hope that is OK to do a major reshuffle and axing of silly material.
yes, it's ok. but let's all be careful about criticising each others work. This page certainly needed work and you have contributed to that. I think we need to try and adopt an approach which encourages people to contributs and where we are all respectful of each others contributions.
OK?
--David 15:14, 2 September 2007 (BST)
