Difference between revisions of "User talk:Idrees"
(superfluous) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
--[[User:David|David]] 16:22, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT) | --[[User:David|David]] 16:22, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == superfluous == | ||
+ | |||
+ | >>Unless there is something in the biography that is particularly revealing, reproducing extended biographies defeats the whole purpose of having a profile. The idea should be to provide condensed factual information that highlights possible conflicts of interests.<< | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hmmm: but there is so little info on Lappen, that the little officially recognized info is worth putting in Spin* -- especially since this type of info is volatile -- i.e., in a few weeks you will see that it is either changed or removed (very common)... as such, keeping the record of these things is valuable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | >>The bios on Lappen & Vallely are in my view mostly superfluous.<< | ||
+ | The Vallely one? There virtually no info there -- and again the official record of the bio is useful... About Lappen... I eliminated a bit, but the experience at SW* with this bio indicated that the only things that remain are those that are sourced | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | >> | ||
+ | Secondly, on the Palast profile, I think you can summarize the nature of his attack on Gallowy without editorializing on Galloways stance on the war<< | ||
+ | Well, on the one hand you want me to summarize things, and on the other you call my summaries "editorializing". Make up your mind. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''And''': FEEL FREE TO EDIT THE ARTICLES YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOU CAN IMPROVE THEM. I would not be offended if you did that. |
Revision as of 14:37, 10 December 2006
Hi,
can you use the footnote format for the Pacific legal foundation etc?
ie: quote [1]
Notes
--David 21:18, 18 Jul 2006 (BST)
Any chance you can tidy up the Conservative Friends of israel page and add a sentence at the beginning?
--David 22:42, 28 Jul 2006 (BST)
Not sure what you mean about dead links and summarising? No need to summarise the profiles at the moment . I think just get them up fo just now and tidy up the other corprate wones --David 09:24, 29 Jul 2006 (BST)
Hi, can you use the referencing format on the campus watch page?
--David 16:22, 9 Nov 2006 (GMT)
superfluous
>>Unless there is something in the biography that is particularly revealing, reproducing extended biographies defeats the whole purpose of having a profile. The idea should be to provide condensed factual information that highlights possible conflicts of interests.<<
Hmmm: but there is so little info on Lappen, that the little officially recognized info is worth putting in Spin* -- especially since this type of info is volatile -- i.e., in a few weeks you will see that it is either changed or removed (very common)... as such, keeping the record of these things is valuable.
>>The bios on Lappen & Vallely are in my view mostly superfluous.<< The Vallely one? There virtually no info there -- and again the official record of the bio is useful... About Lappen... I eliminated a bit, but the experience at SW* with this bio indicated that the only things that remain are those that are sourced
>>
Secondly, on the Palast profile, I think you can summarize the nature of his attack on Gallowy without editorializing on Galloways stance on the war<<
Well, on the one hand you want me to summarize things, and on the other you call my summaries "editorializing". Make up your mind.
And: FEEL FREE TO EDIT THE ARTICLES YOURSELF IF YOU THINK YOU CAN IMPROVE THEM. I would not be offended if you did that.