Difference between revisions of "Climate Portal"

From Powerbase
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
Using the categories on the right of the page you can explore pages on climate sceptics, greenwash, government bodies, corporate climate change lobbies and much more.
 
Using the categories on the right of the page you can explore pages on climate sceptics, greenwash, government bodies, corporate climate change lobbies and much more.
 +
'''[http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Category:Climate Click here for an index of all articles related to the Climate Portal]'''
 +
[[Category:Climate]]
  
 
Powerbase has a policy of [[Powerbase:A Guide to Referencing|strict referencing]] and is overseen by a [[User:Melissa Jones|managing editor]] and a [[User:David|Sysop]] and several associate portal editors.  
 
Powerbase has a policy of [[Powerbase:A Guide to Referencing|strict referencing]] and is overseen by a [[User:Melissa Jones|managing editor]] and a [[User:David|Sysop]] and several associate portal editors.  
 +
 +
Climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time. The global collaboration and individual and institutional action needed to address it's causes and avert the worst of its catastrophic effects are unprecedented. Nonetheless, as the consensus of climate scientists demands stronger and stronger targets and emissions cuts, political failure to meet these challenges is becoming ever more acute.
 +
 +
Meanwhile, polluting high carbon industries have adapted to heightened environmental awareness by portraying themselves as part of the solution, as oppose to the problem itself. While some environmental gains have been made, [http://stopgreenwash.org/ 'greenwash'] (unjustified green claims or spin) has become an industry in itself. The complexities of climate science, climate policy and climate change solutions, coupled with confusion over which green claims to believe, have led to misguided programs and policies, and public disillusionment on the issue.
 +
 +
The Climate Portal aims to provide academics, analysts, campaigners, researchers and all other interested parties with up-to-date and rigorous information on some of the main debates, technologies, industries, lobby groups, public bodies and policies in the area of climate change in the UK. We aim to investigate and de-mystify corporate or political 'greenwash' and examine the activities and connections of some of the main players in the climate change debate.
 +
The portal particularly focuses on [http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Category:Climate Change Sceptics climate change scepticism] , corporate greenwash, the [http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Category:Climate: Energy Industry energy industry]] and [http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Category:Climate: Industry Lobby Groups industry lobby groups], and the connections between government and industry.
 +
 +
The Climate Portal is related to the [[Nuclear Spin Portal|Nuclear Spin]] and [[Mining and Metals Portal|Mining and Metals] portals.
 +
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width="25%">
 
<td width="25%">
Line 30: Line 42:
  
  
<!---------------------------Climate change definition------------------------>
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#d9f7d4; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">What is climate change?</h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
The term ''climate change'' refers to all forms of climate inconsistency, but because the Earth's climate is never static, “climate change” signifies '''a significant change from one set of climate conditions to another.'''
 
  
In the context of environmental policy, climate change or global warming usually refer to changes on modern climate caused by human made CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. This is still a theory trying to establish two ‘cause and effects’: firstly that CO2 is the cause of global  warming, and secondly, that humans are causing it through the burning of fossil fuels.
+
<!---------------------------Climate Change and the UK: An Overview------------------------>
 
 
<!---------------------------Facts and figures------------------------>
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#d9f7d4; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Some facts and figures</h2>
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#d9f7d4; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Some facts and figures</h2>
Line 45: Line 49:
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
|style="color:#000;"|
  
The '''International Panel on Climate Change, IPCC''', is an international body of scientists researching Climate Change. This United Nations study, which was awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, was the most comprehensive study of peer reviewed climate research ever undertaken, and one of the most comprehensive studies of any scientific question ever.  
+
Despite the claims of [climate sceptics] to the contrary, 98% of scientists agree that climate change is anthropogenic and caused largely by emissions of carbon dioxide and other potent greenhouse gases. The [http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.htm fourth report] of the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC) gave warnings that unless action is taken to keep warming below 2°C, positive feedbacks (tipping points) that we cannot control are likely to be activated, leading to unstoppable/runaway climate change that will have devastating impacts on the planet and its people. (see graph)
  
The 4th [http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.htm IPCC Climate Change Report] published in 2007 states:
+
[[Image:2246714022 dea81182df.jpg|centre|Tipping points and climate policy trajectory: A case for rapid carbon descent.]]
 
 
*Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level<ref> IPCC, [http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report], accessed 11th September 2009</ref>.
 
 
 
*Global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre-industrial times, with an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004.<ref> IPCC, [http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report], accessed 11th September 2009</ref>.
 
 
 
*Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (confidence level >90%) due to the  observed increase in human greenhouse gas concentrations.
 
 
 
The IPCC report conclusions are that climate change is an empirical fact. The only question worth asking is how fast we can act to create real reductions in atmospheric CO2.
 
  
<center> C02 levels over the past 60,000 years.</center>
+
The [http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/default.html Copenhagen Diagnosis], a scientific document prepared for the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 concluded 'that several important aspects of climate change are already occurring at the high end, or even beyond, the expectations of just a few years ago'. It asserted that:
[[Image:co2levels.jpg|center|800px|438px]]
 
Source: Training for Transition, TTT, 2007.
 
  
Carbon dioxide is not, however, the only greenhouse gas affecting climate. Experts also warm that other greenhouse gases, such as methane, sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons, are also directly involved in most of the increases in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century".<ref> IPCC, [http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf  Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report], accessed 11th September 2009</ref>.
+
:"by 2020 industrial nations must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by around 40% below 1990 levels to secure a decent chance of avoiding dangerous human interference with the climate system."
  
<!---------------------------Copenhagen 2009------------------------>
+
The report also found that global ice sheets are melting at an increased rate; Arctic sea ice is thinning and melting much faster than recently projected, and future sea-level rise is now expected to be much higher than previously forecast. Without significant mitigation, the report concluded that global mean warming could reach as high as 7 degrees Celsius by 2100.
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#d9f7d4; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">The road to Copenhagen </h2>
 
|-
 
|style="color:#000;"|
 
  
COP15 is the popular name for a conference that took place under the general framework of the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009, 7–18 December at the Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. This conference represents the 15th Conference of the Parties – hence the name – to the United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change. Copenhagen 2009 included the 5th Meeting of the Parties (COP/MOP5) to the Kyoto Protocol.
+
Despite these predictions, the 15th Conference of the Parties to the [http://unfccc.int/2860.php United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change], or [[COP15]], in Copenhagen 2009, failed to agree to any binding emissions reduction targets to take the place of the Kyoto protocol. The Kyoto protocol itself has been criticised as unambitious and ineffective, and has certainly failed to achieve any meaningful cuts worldwide. Lumumba Di-Aping, chief negotiator for the G77 group of 130 developing countries, called the conference outcome 'nothing short of climate change scepticism in action', adding 'It locks countries into a cycle of poverty for ever'<ref>John Vidal, Allegra Stratton and Suzanne Goldenberg [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/18/copenhagen-deal 'Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure'] Saturday 19 December 2009.</ref>.
  
The conference was significant as it was scheduled to come up with the next binding agreement after the first stage of the Kyoto protocol expires in 2012. In the largest climate demonstrations to date over 100,000 people protested in Copenhagen, putting pressure on governments to achieve tough and legally binding carbon descent targets, highlighting the ineffectiveness of the Kyoto targets, which are far from being met by most states. Meanwhile the conference was slammed for turning away even mainstream NGOs such as [[Friends of the Earth]] and [[Avaaz]] as many registered civil society [http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/UK_Participants_and_Observers_at_COP15 participants and observers] were prevented from attending, leading to accusations of elitism and a denial of democracy <ref>John Vidal and Jonathan Watts [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/16/friends-of-the-earth-barred-bella-centre
+
The UK has been congratulated for having the most ambitious emissions reduction targets in the world, aiming for [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/oct/16/greenpolitics-edmiliband 80% cuts from 1990 levels by 2050] (which will give us a 50:50 chance of avoiding the worst predications <ref>Alice Bows, quoted by Severin Carrell in The Guardian [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/23/uk-emission-cuts-airport-protest-trial 'UK emission cuts 'not radical enough', airport protest trial told'] 23rd June 2010</ref>). However, over the last 10 years British emissions have actually increased, and there is little sign that the drastic changes needed to meet this target are being made, leading to accusations that the targets are [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/audio/2008/oct/17/climate-change-edmiliband 'all politics'] and no substance.
'Friends of the Earth among activists barred from Copenhagen conference centre'] The Guardian, Wednesday 16 December 2009. Accessed 16/01/10</ref>.  
 
  
The ultimate failure of the conference to reach any effective agreement is is also being hailed as historically important as it is seen by some to signify the end of hope in top-down government and business led climate change strategy. Lumumba Di-Aping, chief negotiator for the G77 group of 130 developing countries, called the conference outcome 'nothing short of climate change scepticism in action', adding 'It locks countries into a cycle of poverty for ever'. <ref>John Vidal, Allegra Stratton and Suzanne Goldenberg [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/18/copenhagen-deal 'Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure'] Saturday 19 December 2009.</ref>
+
International agreements, and Britain's policies, rely on market based solutions to reduce emissions. Central to this is the notion of [[Carbon Trading]], which allows polluting industries to continue emitting, as long as they pay for someone else to curb emissions elsewhere. This method has been encouraged by many industries who see this as the cheapest and easiest option, especially as many have received exemptions from payment. Market based solutions such as the 'cap and trade' scheme have been heavily criticised by a range of commentators (see recommended reading), and have so far failed to deliver any reductions.
 
 
The increase in public denial and disillusionment about climate change in Britain may also be seen as a manifestation of hopelessness and apathy about finding solutions to the issue, perpetuated by ineffective government strategies, which have historically targeted individual behaviour over polluting industry. Only 41% of those surveyed by a recent Times newspaper poll believed climate change was anthropogenic (man made) despite established science to the contrary. <ref>Ben Webster and Peter Liddell, The Times, November 14,2009. 'Global warming is not our fault, say most voters in Times poll'</ref>
 
 
 
The graph below shows the path of current Kyoto strategy which takes us over the red tipping point (using IPCC's most recent reports) and into 'runaway' or unstoppable climate change (caused by a number of natural knock on effects or 'positive feedbacks' which kick in once a certain carbon concentration is reached). The action needed to address this devastating threat is rapid carbon descent, translating into deep cuts in the activities of carbon heavy industries and energy production, and a matching decrease in consumption. Despite this, in mid November 2009 President Obama and other world leaders announced their plan to delay any agreement until after the Copenhagen summit, pushing urgent issues into the future.<ref>Helene Cooper, The New York Times, 14th Nov 2009. 'Leaders Will Delay Deal on Climate Change'</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
[[Image:2246714022 dea81182df.jpg|centre|Tipping points and climate policy trajectory: A case for rapid carbon descent.]]
 
  
 +
Meanwhile public denial and disillusionment about climate change in Britain is on the increase, a manifestation of hopelessness and apathy about finding solutions to the issue, perpetuated by ineffective government strategies, which have historically targeted individual behaviour over polluting industry. Only 41% of those surveyed by a recent Times newspaper poll believed climate change was anthropogenic (man made) despite established science to the contrary<ref>Ben Webster and Peter Liddell, The Times, November 14,2009. 'Global warming is not our fault, say most voters in Times poll'</ref>.
  
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Copenhagen_2009:_Who%27s_Who Copenhagen 2009: Who's Who]
 
 
   
 
   
 
|}
 
|}
Line 114: Line 96:
 
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate_Scientists Climate Scientists]
 
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate_Scientists Climate Scientists]
 
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate_Science Climate Science]
 
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate_Science Climate Science]
 +
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate:_Carbon_Trading Carbon Trading]
 +
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate:_Government_People Government People]
 +
*[http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Category:Climate:_Government_Policy Government Policy]
  
<!---------------------------News and articles------------------------>
+
<!---------------------------Key Readings------------------------>
 
|-
 
|-
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#c9d7f0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">News and articles</h2>
 
! <h2 style="margin:0; background:#c9d7f0; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #7ba06d; text-align:left; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em;">News and articles</h2>

Revision as of 11:57, 8 July 2010

Welcome to the Climate Portal on Powerbase

Welcome to the Climate Portal, the portal dedicated to exposing and reporting on the spin and lobbying efforts concerning climate change, global warming and other climate-related topics. The Climate Portal is part of Powerbase—your guide to networks of power, lobbying and deceptive PR.

Using the categories on the right of the page you can explore pages on climate sceptics, greenwash, government bodies, corporate climate change lobbies and much more. Click here for an index of all articles related to the Climate Portal

Powerbase has a policy of strict referencing and is overseen by a managing editor and a Sysop and several associate portal editors.

Climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time. The global collaboration and individual and institutional action needed to address it's causes and avert the worst of its catastrophic effects are unprecedented. Nonetheless, as the consensus of climate scientists demands stronger and stronger targets and emissions cuts, political failure to meet these challenges is becoming ever more acute.

Meanwhile, polluting high carbon industries have adapted to heightened environmental awareness by portraying themselves as part of the solution, as oppose to the problem itself. While some environmental gains have been made, 'greenwash' (unjustified green claims or spin) has become an industry in itself. The complexities of climate science, climate policy and climate change solutions, coupled with confusion over which green claims to believe, have led to misguided programs and policies, and public disillusionment on the issue.

The Climate Portal aims to provide academics, analysts, campaigners, researchers and all other interested parties with up-to-date and rigorous information on some of the main debates, technologies, industries, lobby groups, public bodies and policies in the area of climate change in the UK. We aim to investigate and de-mystify corporate or political 'greenwash' and examine the activities and connections of some of the main players in the climate change debate. The portal particularly focuses on Change Sceptics climate change scepticism , corporate greenwash, the Energy Industry energy industry] and Industry Lobby Groups industry lobby groups, and the connections between government and industry.

The Climate Portal is related to the Nuclear Spin and [[Mining and Metals Portal|Mining and Metals] portals.

Global warming.jpg This article is part of the Climate project of Spinwatch.


Some facts and figures

Despite the claims of [climate sceptics] to the contrary, 98% of scientists agree that climate change is anthropogenic and caused largely by emissions of carbon dioxide and other potent greenhouse gases. The fourth report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) gave warnings that unless action is taken to keep warming below 2°C, positive feedbacks (tipping points) that we cannot control are likely to be activated, leading to unstoppable/runaway climate change that will have devastating impacts on the planet and its people. (see graph)

Tipping points and climate policy trajectory: A case for rapid carbon descent.

The Copenhagen Diagnosis, a scientific document prepared for the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 concluded 'that several important aspects of climate change are already occurring at the high end, or even beyond, the expectations of just a few years ago'. It asserted that:

"by 2020 industrial nations must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by around 40% below 1990 levels to secure a decent chance of avoiding dangerous human interference with the climate system."

The report also found that global ice sheets are melting at an increased rate; Arctic sea ice is thinning and melting much faster than recently projected, and future sea-level rise is now expected to be much higher than previously forecast. Without significant mitigation, the report concluded that global mean warming could reach as high as 7 degrees Celsius by 2100.

Despite these predictions, the 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change, or COP15, in Copenhagen 2009, failed to agree to any binding emissions reduction targets to take the place of the Kyoto protocol. The Kyoto protocol itself has been criticised as unambitious and ineffective, and has certainly failed to achieve any meaningful cuts worldwide. Lumumba Di-Aping, chief negotiator for the G77 group of 130 developing countries, called the conference outcome 'nothing short of climate change scepticism in action', adding 'It locks countries into a cycle of poverty for ever'[1].

The UK has been congratulated for having the most ambitious emissions reduction targets in the world, aiming for 80% cuts from 1990 levels by 2050 (which will give us a 50:50 chance of avoiding the worst predications [2]). However, over the last 10 years British emissions have actually increased, and there is little sign that the drastic changes needed to meet this target are being made, leading to accusations that the targets are 'all politics' and no substance.

International agreements, and Britain's policies, rely on market based solutions to reduce emissions. Central to this is the notion of Carbon Trading, which allows polluting industries to continue emitting, as long as they pay for someone else to curb emissions elsewhere. This method has been encouraged by many industries who see this as the cheapest and easiest option, especially as many have received exemptions from payment. Market based solutions such as the 'cap and trade' scheme have been heavily criticised by a range of commentators (see recommended reading), and have so far failed to deliver any reductions.

Meanwhile public denial and disillusionment about climate change in Britain is on the increase, a manifestation of hopelessness and apathy about finding solutions to the issue, perpetuated by ineffective government strategies, which have historically targeted individual behaviour over polluting industry. Only 41% of those surveyed by a recent Times newspaper poll believed climate change was anthropogenic (man made) despite established science to the contrary[3].


Categories

There are a list of categories associated with this page:

News and articles

The Hadley Centre Warns that Average 4°C Warming Could Happen Within a Human Lifetime, With Even Greater Warming in Many Regions

Resources

References

  1. John Vidal, Allegra Stratton and Suzanne Goldenberg 'Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure' Saturday 19 December 2009.
  2. Alice Bows, quoted by Severin Carrell in The Guardian 'UK emission cuts 'not radical enough', airport protest trial told' 23rd June 2010
  3. Ben Webster and Peter Liddell, The Times, November 14,2009. 'Global warming is not our fault, say most voters in Times poll'