Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mari Cruz Garcia Vallejo"
(→PS resources and refs) |
(→dates of sources etc: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
but we also have a Notes or References section which automatically appears on any page we create via Articles Submission. It's coded by the following text: | but we also have a Notes or References section which automatically appears on any page we create via Articles Submission. It's coded by the following text: | ||
| − | <nowiki> | + | :<nowiki>==References==</nowiki> |
| − | |||
| − | :<references/></nowiki> | + | :<nowiki><references/></nowiki> |
at foot of page. this is different from resources. this is where the refs that are properly created in the article end up going and numbering themselves automatically. This Notes section should be at the foot of all our articles, including the portal page if we are making points that need referencing, as in the Pharma portal page. | at foot of page. this is different from resources. this is where the refs that are properly created in the article end up going and numbering themselves automatically. This Notes section should be at the foot of all our articles, including the portal page if we are making points that need referencing, as in the Pharma portal page. | ||
| Line 82: | Line 81: | ||
thank you! --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 12:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | thank you! --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 12:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == refs ps == | ||
| + | |||
| + | HI Mari | ||
| + | |||
| + | almost there on refs... this is the hardest thing but once you have this under your belt everything else is simple... | ||
| + | |||
| + | we need to put a title (of article, webpage or whatever it is) on the square bracket of the ref, after the url but separated from it by a space. See how I have edited the refs in the following section on Copenhagen 2009: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Copenhagen Climate Network: A network of key persons from Danish and international businesses, whose aim is to to establish networks among businesses, individuals and organisations supporting a climate policy focusing on the environment.[2] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Copenhagen Climate Council: A global collaboration between business and science founded by the independent think tank Monday Morning, based in Copenhagen. Its aim is to create global awareness of the importance of the COP15 Conference.[3] | ||
| + | |||
| + | for the first ref, I have edited the ref to read: | ||
| + | <nowiki><ref>[http://www.ccn2009.org/sw2957.asp About Us], Copenhagen Climate Network website, accessed 23 Sept 2009</ref></nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the second, I have edited it to read: | ||
| + | <nowiki><ref>[http://copenhagenclimatecouncil.com Home page], Copenhagen Climate Council website, accessed 23 Sept 2009</ref></nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | so you see you open square bracket, put the url, then space, then page or article title, then close square bracket, then put rest of the info in. | ||
| + | |||
| + | thanks for your patience!! | ||
| + | |||
| + | and for your work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 11:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == dates of sources etc == | ||
| + | |||
| + | HI Mari | ||
| + | |||
| + | good stuff on Copenhagen 2009. I just added dates of the documents to a couple of the refs near the end. if we include as much info as poss in our refs it means people are more likely to be able to find the docs in a few years' time, possibly after the weblinks are dead. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cd you just add an intro sentence saying what Cop 2009 is? and give the abbreviation as I think many refer to it as COP15 or whatever number we are at now? | ||
| + | |||
| + | eg Copenhagen 2009 is an international conference addressing the problems and challenges of climate change... | ||
| + | |||
| + | or whatever? | ||
| + | |||
| + | many thanks | ||
| + | --[[User:Claire Robinson|Claire Robinson]] 11:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 29 September 2009
Hi Mari
May be a work in prog but if you want to create a page called Prueba, do go to articles submission and put title into the Climate Org box, then you will get a page.
http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Article_Submission
at the moment there is a copy of the climate portal page with Prueba at the top. But sorry if I am jumping the gun and there is a reason...
thanks
--Claire Robinson 11:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
new page
Hi Mari
I moved your new page to a properly titled one at http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Copenhagen_2009:_Who%27s_Who
can you just move over the content you have got on your version to the right page? It's just go into Edit, then copy and paste
thanks --Claire Robinson 15:11, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
moved content
just moved the content, hope i have got latest version
thanks --Claire Robinson 15:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
refs
HI Mari
great work on climate portal and Copenhagen page http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Copenhagen_2009:_Who%27s_Who
just a small point about refs -- we aim to have all the weblinks tucked away in refs at foot of page, so we don't have external links within the body text such as are present in the following section:
- ... the following organizations:
- Copenhagen Climate Network: A network of key persons from Danish and international businesses, whose aim is to to establish networks among businesses, individuals and organisations supporting a climate policy focusing on the environment.
- Copenhagen Climate Council: A global collaboration between business and science founded by the independent think tank Monday Morning, based in Copenhagen. Its aim is to create global awareness of the importance of the COP15 Conference.
I have already edited two of the refs for the page so that they are tucked away in the Notes section at the bottom, and you can go into Edit mode and see how I have formatted them in order to create this result.
Can you complete the process by editing the weblinks in the above quoted passage by making them into proper refs?
Thus the following--
- Copenhagen Climate Network: A network of key persons from Danish and international businesses, whose aim is to to establish networks among businesses, individuals and organisations supporting a climate policy focusing on the environment.
should be edited to read--
[[Copenhagen Climate Network]]: A network of key persons from Danish and international businesses, whose aim is to to establish networks among businesses, individuals and organisations supporting a climate policy focusing on the environment.<ref>[http://www.ccn2009.org/sw2957.asp About Us], Copenhagen Climate Network website, accessed 23 Sept 2009</ref>
And the second point about the Copenhagen Climate Council needs to be edited in same way.
I hope this makes sense. you can ask me any q's by clicking on the link that is my 'signature' below and this will take you to my talk page, where you can add a message by clicking on the + sign in top tab and typing and saving.
best wishes --Claire Robinson 11:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
PS resources and refs
HI Mari
just a PS about resources and refs -- on many of our pages we often have a Resources section with a proper header, as on this page http://www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Monsanto
this is for other sites, books, articles or pages that we want to refer the reader to as further reading.
but we also have a Notes or References section which automatically appears on any page we create via Articles Submission. It's coded by the following text:
- ==References==
- <references/>
at foot of page. this is different from resources. this is where the refs that are properly created in the article end up going and numbering themselves automatically. This Notes section should be at the foot of all our articles, including the portal page if we are making points that need referencing, as in the Pharma portal page.
so on the Copenhagen page and the Climate portal page I've made sure that these separate sections are there and working.
thank you! --Claire Robinson 12:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
refs ps
HI Mari
almost there on refs... this is the hardest thing but once you have this under your belt everything else is simple...
we need to put a title (of article, webpage or whatever it is) on the square bracket of the ref, after the url but separated from it by a space. See how I have edited the refs in the following section on Copenhagen 2009:
- Copenhagen Climate Network: A network of key persons from Danish and international businesses, whose aim is to to establish networks among businesses, individuals and organisations supporting a climate policy focusing on the environment.[2]
- Copenhagen Climate Council: A global collaboration between business and science founded by the independent think tank Monday Morning, based in Copenhagen. Its aim is to create global awareness of the importance of the COP15 Conference.[3]
for the first ref, I have edited the ref to read: <ref>[http://www.ccn2009.org/sw2957.asp About Us], Copenhagen Climate Network website, accessed 23 Sept 2009</ref>
For the second, I have edited it to read: <ref>[http://copenhagenclimatecouncil.com Home page], Copenhagen Climate Council website, accessed 23 Sept 2009</ref>
so you see you open square bracket, put the url, then space, then page or article title, then close square bracket, then put rest of the info in.
thanks for your patience!!
and for your work.
--Claire Robinson 11:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
dates of sources etc
HI Mari
good stuff on Copenhagen 2009. I just added dates of the documents to a couple of the refs near the end. if we include as much info as poss in our refs it means people are more likely to be able to find the docs in a few years' time, possibly after the weblinks are dead.
Cd you just add an intro sentence saying what Cop 2009 is? and give the abbreviation as I think many refer to it as COP15 or whatever number we are at now?
eg Copenhagen 2009 is an international conference addressing the problems and challenges of climate change...
or whatever?
many thanks --Claire Robinson 11:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
