Difference between revisions of "Mark Lynas"
(New page: ==Background== Mark Lynas and Oliver Tickell are two journalists who helped drafting a climate change scenario study of the Stockholm Network. Other authors include big oil management peop...) |
(book blurb) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Template:Climate badge}} | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| − | Mark Lynas and Oliver Tickell are two journalists who helped | + | Mark Lynas and [[Oliver Tickell]] are two journalists who helped draft a climate change scenario study of the [[Stockholm Network]].<ref>Stockholm Network [http://www.stockholm-network.org Homepage], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> Other authors include big oil management people ([[BP]] and [[Shell]]) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.<ref>Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),[http://www.corporateeurope.org/ThinkTankSurvey2006.html Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics], December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009</ref> The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.<ref>Mark Lynas, [http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors Why greens must learn to love nuclear power], accessed March 13, 2009</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==From anti to pro-nuclear== |
| − | === | + | ===Book=== |
| + | Blurb | ||
| + | :Everything you thought you knew about nuclear power is wrong. This is just as well, according to Mark Lynas in Nuclear 2.0, because nuclear energy is essential to avoid catastrophic global warming. Using the latest world energy statistics Lynas shows that with wind and solar still at only about 1 percent of global primary energy, asking renewables to deliver all the world’s power is “dangerously delusional”. Moreover, there is no possibility of using less energy, he reminds us, when the developing world is fast extricating itself from poverty and adding the equivalent of a new Brazil to global electricity consumption each year. The anti-nuclear movement of the 1970s and 80s succeeded only in making the world more dependent on fossil fuels, he shows: its history is “not lit by sunshine, | ||
| + | but shrouded in coal smoke”. Instead of making the same mistake again, all those who want to see a low-carbon | ||
| − | == | + | ===Pro-nuclear film on BBC ahead of EDF and UK government deal=== |
| + | *[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24445371 Nuclear power support from former sceptic Mark Lynas], BBC Daily Politics, 8 October 2013 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes== | ==Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes== | ||
| − | http://www.marklynas.org/ | + | * Mark Lynas, ''Nuclear 2.0 Why Nuclear a Green Future Needs Nuclear'', e-book |
| − | http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios | + | ===Contact Details=== |
| − | + | :Website: http://www.marklynas.org/ | |
| − | + | :Website:http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Resources=== | ===Resources=== | ||
| Line 38: | Line 26: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Climate Change|Lynas, Mark]][[Category:Journalists|Lynas, Mark]] [[Category:Climate Science|Lynas, Mark]] [[Category:Pro-nuclear columnists|Lynas, Mark]] |
Latest revision as of 05:31, 28 October 2013
Contents
Background
Mark Lynas and Oliver Tickell are two journalists who helped draft a climate change scenario study of the Stockholm Network.[1] Other authors include big oil management people (BP and Shell) apart from a few academics. The study claims a distance from climate sceptical research promoted by "U.S. think tanks" according to media reports on the scenario study, although the Stockholm Network itself has previously promoted climate scepticism itself.[2] The scenario study argues in favor of a radical departure from the political course taken so far (Kyoto) allegedly because the instruments are less effective than an alternative promoted in a "step change" scenario advocating taxation at the origin of the carbon chain. No information on distributional consequences are given, unfortunately. It is unclear who would carry the burden if this allegedly economic growth supporting alternative would be pursued, and the whole strategy may be primarily meant to help undermining the Kyoto diplomacy. Mark Lynas in any case has also written in favor of nuclear energy.[3]
From anti to pro-nuclear
Book
Blurb
- Everything you thought you knew about nuclear power is wrong. This is just as well, according to Mark Lynas in Nuclear 2.0, because nuclear energy is essential to avoid catastrophic global warming. Using the latest world energy statistics Lynas shows that with wind and solar still at only about 1 percent of global primary energy, asking renewables to deliver all the world’s power is “dangerously delusional”. Moreover, there is no possibility of using less energy, he reminds us, when the developing world is fast extricating itself from poverty and adding the equivalent of a new Brazil to global electricity consumption each year. The anti-nuclear movement of the 1970s and 80s succeeded only in making the world more dependent on fossil fuels, he shows: its history is “not lit by sunshine,
but shrouded in coal smoke”. Instead of making the same mistake again, all those who want to see a low-carbon
Pro-nuclear film on BBC ahead of EDF and UK government deal
- Nuclear power support from former sceptic Mark Lynas, BBC Daily Politics, 8 October 2013
Publications, Contact, Resources and Notes
- Mark Lynas, Nuclear 2.0 Why Nuclear a Green Future Needs Nuclear, e-book
Contact Details
- Website: http://www.marklynas.org/
- Website:http://www.stockholm-network.org/Conferences-and-Programmes/Energy-and-Environment/carbonscenarios
Resources
Notes
- ↑ Stockholm Network Homepage, accessed March 13, 2009
- ↑ Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO),Brussels think tanks persist in funding secrecy: ExxonMobil covertly funds EU climate skeptics, December 2006, accessed March 13, 2009
- ↑ Mark Lynas, Why greens must learn to love nuclear power, accessed March 13, 2009
