Difference between revisions of "National Planning Association"
(→References) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
William Domhoff writes: | William Domhoff writes: | ||
| − | :The [[National Planning Association]], for example, is a small policy-discussion group which took its present form in 1942 as part of the concern with postwar planning. It has a more liberal outlook than the CED, but has been very close to it. In the mid- | + | :The [[National Planning Association]], for example, is a small policy-discussion group which took its present form in 1942 as part of the concern with postwar planning. It has a more liberal outlook than the CED, but has been very close to it. In the mid-1950's the two organizations considered a merger, but decided against it because the NPA has a distinctive role to play in that both its leadership and study groups include representatives from labor and agriculture: 'NPA did not want to lose the frankness and open interchange it achieved through labor participation, and CED felt it had acquired a reputation for objectivity and did not wish to dilute this good will toward an avowedly business organization by bringing in other groups.'{{ref|25}}{{ref|domhoff}} |
| − | == | + | ==References== |
| − | + | #{{note|25}} Eakins, op. cit., p. 479.) | |
| − | + | #{{note|domhoff}} G. William Domhoff, (1967) Who Rules America, Spectrum Books, pp. 76 | |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 14:58, 4 July 2007
William Domhoff writes:
- The National Planning Association, for example, is a small policy-discussion group which took its present form in 1942 as part of the concern with postwar planning. It has a more liberal outlook than the CED, but has been very close to it. In the mid-1950's the two organizations considered a merger, but decided against it because the NPA has a distinctive role to play in that both its leadership and study groups include representatives from labor and agriculture: 'NPA did not want to lose the frankness and open interchange it achieved through labor participation, and CED felt it had acquired a reputation for objectivity and did not wish to dilute this good will toward an avowedly business organization by bringing in other groups.'[1][2]
